Started By
Message

re: Obama's economic success: More Jobs, more income, less unemployment

Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:45 am to
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34957 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:45 am to
How do you feel about the DNC actively working against bernie to elect shitlery?

On the flip side, how would you have felt if the DNC actively worked against shitlery and In turn pushed an old decrepit white man up to the front?
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:46 am to
quote:

A 10 second google search could have saved you from posting incorrect information... And yet.. Here we are. Sigh.


more lies and faux condescension from libtards in this thread, I see . . . at least go get some actual bogus numbers from TJ before going this route
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123814 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:55 am to
quote:

A 10 second google search could have saved you from posting incorrect information... And yet.. Here we are. Sigh.
Indeed! ... And yet.. Here we are. Sigh.

Obamanomics LFPR: Ages 25-54


Obamanomics LFPR: Ages >65


Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

TJGator1215
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:58 am to
If one full time job becomes two part time jobs does that mean both part time jobs are counted as "jobs created" or do they count one of those jobs as "saved"(as in "saved or created")?

And I'm pretty sure that older Americans are the only group with an increase in participation.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13163 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Created more part time jobs after people lost their full time jobs, then were taken off the rolls so the numbers didn't show how bad he was doing. The last 8 years have been one lie after another, and your crowd took it, hook, line and sinker. Then regurgitated that bull shite to people who lost jobs, had hours cut, or can't even save anymore. You're a special breed of stupid.


This and most of the non-part-time jobs that were added were government jobs which added to the deficit.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:02 pm to
I challenge you to find any 8-year period of American history with lower real GDP growth in the U.S. than what we've just seen over the past 8 years from 2009-2016, and that doesn't include the years 1930 or 1931.
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
18833 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Cliff Notes:

If I were to provide you with the information and number I've found elsewhere you would think them to be just as bogus as this useless drivel you believe.

The first one alone was all I had to see to know this is crap. Why you may ask? The number is based on those still on the government dole. A person is dropped from that number when their unemployment runs out. Have you looked to see how many that may be?

Next on that same issue is how obamacare has effected this faux fact. The mandate that companies provide insurance for employees that work over 32 hrs/wk. caused companies to cut back employee hours and then hire more workers to get work done. Your hero may not fare so well when history examines his accomplishments.

quote:

Given all the adversity he's had to over come dealing with Republicans
quote:

Given all the adversity he's had to over come dealing with Republicans


You are just another uninformed lemming if this is your conclusion. The stupid reps (Mitch Mc.) told the pres they would not shut down the gov't. They gave him everything he wanted. Even more than the dem controlled congress before them.
Posted by Haydo
DTX
Member since Jul 2011
2942 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Cliff Notes


you're a fricking idiot

quote:

Unemployment is at 4.7%


While the number of those not in the labor force, which is not taken in to account when determining unemployment is 90 million. The highest it's ever been. Tell the whole story.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146577 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 1:35 pm to
Here is some more BS propaganda some dumbass posted on the OT as a tribute to Obamaer.

If you believe this garbage get your head examined and unindoctrinated.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10565 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 2:09 pm to
Population under Reagan: 240,000,000

Population under Obama: 320,000,000

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51491 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

A 10 second google search could have saved you from posting incorrect information... And yet.. Here we are. Sigh.


I give you two links to very respected sites (one being the actual government agency's site) to back up the fact you are wrong and your response basically sums up to "nuh-uhhhh". Sticking with a false narrative despite facts proffered like that is why your candidate got embarrasingly skull-fricked by an orange Cheeto.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Unemployment is at 4.7% over less than half of when he took office.


Less people are registering for unemployment, or looking for work. Congrats


quote:

Created more jobs than the Bushes just behind Reagan overall


Part time jobs to fluff #s. Congrats
LINK

quote:

A moderately successful POTUS. Given all the adversity he's had to over come


Your opinion, and who doesn't have to overcome adversity. What would you say trump is going through? And he hasn't even taken office yet, and he's got actual jobs beating down the door to come home.

This post was edited on 1/8/17 at 6:37 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45994 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

quote:
Less participation at 62%. Probably due to all the boomers retiring or dying.

Are you fricking stupid?


He's not going to answer your question so I'll step in and be the idiot's surrogate......, YES, he's STUPID! and a DRONE!
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45994 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Adversity be damned....considering how close we were to complete economic collapse in 2008 everyone in Washington has done yoeman's work. Could there have been more done? Yes, but they did it within the confines of United States politics, the envy of the world.



And then you drones trot this line of crapola out, so saving the corrupt financial system by ripping off the prudent savers/retirees with ZIRP was a heroic move by the government? Ok!

I'm not going to bother banging on you about TARP and QE but you should have at least got a clue who's running the show......, globally!
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14842 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

some downsides

Less participation at 62%. Probably due to all the boomers retiring or dying.



If the labor participation rate is 62% of people that have ever lived, you should consider moving that stat out of the "downsides" category.
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
25299 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 7:22 pm to
And to top it off we have Hillary carrying out his 3rd term by proxy!!



oh wait
This post was edited on 1/8/17 at 7:23 pm
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 7:33 pm to
almost all the jobs that were actually added were part time and mostlt waiters and burger flippers...the ggod jobs were either sent over seas or given to foreigner brought in on visas...for example:Disney World forced long term workers to train their foreign replacements! I will neber give Disney another stinking penny in any form...not movies, not theme parks, nothing!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram