Started By
Message

re: Noam Chomsky Is a Tool

Posted on 12/9/16 at 12:16 am to
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 12:16 am to
Chomsky is a little bit out of it at this point -- he's 88.

In this case he puts too much value on the parties being totally separate entities.

I have ridicule for Noam over some other issues, but to say he's anything like George Soros is just an absurd lack of understanding.

Noam is an anarchist socialist. He believes in the aim for no government.

He speaks out admittedly against the vision of the likes of Soros.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 6:50 am to
Chomsky is not all in for Israel. He is not soros lite.

You guys fail at evaluating chomskys simple statement.

Trumps Republican party is a danger to us all. Anti's in charge of epa.
Carson in the govt.
Pretty low.
Team and cabinet hand picked to please td. What could go wrong?

Chomsky says, this will not end well.


Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81634 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 7:06 am to
Gfy the alt right is one of the more thoughtful wings of "conservatism". Certainly more thoughtful and realistic than neoconservatives
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 7:08 am
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22079 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 7:10 am to
He is quite a tool when it comes to politics. But a genius when it comes to linguistics, formal languages, and set theory.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 7:34 am to
quote:

He is quite a tool when it comes to politics. But a genius when it comes to linguistics, formal languages, and set theory.


Bingo. Chomsky is the ultimate example of just because you are brilliant in one area, doesn't mean you're not a fricking retard in others.
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 8:25 am
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4855 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:04 am to
quote:

(((Chomsky)))

quote:

(((Soros)))


The way you have parenthesized these names gives me the impression that you are incredibly pathetic.
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4855 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:06 am to
quote:

****y




What phase are you in? And how does it not involve being ****y?

You could be going through a phase with a blind spot for ****iness because circle jerking about trumpery is pretty damn ****y.
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22290 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:09 am to
Buckley vs Chomsky LINK

Both were great debaters.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:10 am to
Where they cunning linguists?









(sorry but someone had to)
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4855 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Bingo. Chomsky is the penultimate example


Penultimate, huh? Perhaps you should chop off the first three letters because penultimate means second to last. As is, the sentence reads like it was written by a "fricking retard".
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4855 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:18 am to
I could've one-hit quit Buckley.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I agree but chomsky actually does his part to call (((them))) out, which is fascinating.




Call out who???
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Penultimate, huh? Perhaps you should chop off the first three letters because penultimate means second to last. As is, the sentence reads like it was written by a "fricking retard".


Pardon me for my autocorrect error Mr. Grammar. I appreciate your attention to detail in this matter.

Now go frick yourself with splintered piece of post oak good sir.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:33 am to
quote:

But a genius when it comes to linguistics, formal languages, and set theory.


A lot of people disagree. His theory of, basically, a "language gene" ( thats not the actual term) has been strongly challenged by others in the field.

He often republishes his own works with omissions of challenged "facts" in a way to leave them out to "clarify" his points. The man is a fraud.

The book by one of his past admirers, Diary of an Anti-Chomskyite by Benjamin Kerstien explains some of the things about Chompsky.
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4855 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:25 am to
That seems odd. Just don't be so pathetic next time.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

It's really not though. Whether or not people believe in the golden rule or are too psychopathic to follow it, it's the only way we continue as a society. You know what feels good, you what it feels like if you've been treated like shite. Whether or not people want to accept it, when their cities are under water, they will wonder if burning dinosaur bones was absolutely required. You'll never worry about this because you're happy, but to think these things willl never have importance is absurd.


True Believer......
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27484 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 10:06 am to
Chomsky is 88 years old...he's not long for this world anyway. Let the senile old Bolshevik be . He's irrelevent
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:33 pm to
quote:


Bingo. Chomsky is the ultimate example of just because you are brilliant in one area, doesn't mean you're not a fricking retard in others.


I would imagine you've spent little to no time reading or listening to Chomsky.

Just a hunch.

I've always thought he's an excellent historian above anything else.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101390 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

quote:
(((Chomsky)))

quote:
(((Soros)))


The way you have parenthesized these names gives me the impression that you are incredibly pathetic.



What is it even supposed to mean?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55448 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

What is it even supposed to mean?



Pointing out possible ethnic ties that aren't immediately obvious is clearly pathetic, don't ya know?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram