Started By
Message

re: My feeling on capitalism

Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:17 am to
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9084 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:17 am to
Ok, if these were self sustaining plots of land, then why did they need to flee their property?

And then there's this: "Mr Canales added that families who fled to larger towns in order to earn money are often loath to return to the country because it is viewed as taking a step backwards."

Why would they consider it a "move backwards" if they had a better standard of living before they were "forced" into the city?

Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:22 am to
quote:



Holy lord, man. I'm saying our poor are not starving, in fact, quit the opposite....which never happened before in human history.


Yes, I know. They're fat because of fake food, there have been poor people and cultures before capitalism that have been properly fed with real food. Making your point not a point.


quote:


Never heard that explanation before. Do you have a source or link I can check out?


ETA: just saw the link above. Do you have any other studies besides Spain?


Be Less Lazy.

I'm sorry, I'm not going to waste time educating you on side things. If you want to research you have the tools to do it.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9084 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:28 am to
quote:

They're fat because of fake food


They're fat because they CHOOSE to eat fake food. They could afford to eat healthy if they wanted to.

Starvation was COMMON before capitalism. It has been RARE in countries that adopted it.

quote:

I'm not going to waste time educating you on side things. If you want to research you have the tools to do it.


I was giving you an opportunity to present your best evidence...you know, what debates are normally all about. I noticed you didn't touch the part about the farmers NOT wanting to go back to the country and you didn't attempt to answer why people would flee a "self sustaining" area to begin w/.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 12:59 am
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27318 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:33 am to
The only skinny/starving ones I see here are the ones that use their benefits to buy drugs, booze etc. Can't fix stupid. Let'em die off. More for the rest of us. It's nature's way. Do you hate nature?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 12:58 am to
quote:

The only skinny/starving ones I see here are the ones that use their benefits to buy drugs, booze etc. Can't fix stupid. Let'em die off. More for the rest of us. It's nature's way. Do you hate nature?


Everything you say makes sense, it really does.

There is a level in me that says the exact same thing, has the same exact take on things, but you're only adding 2+2, when there is a lot more to the equation.

And are the skinny starving people in other parts of the world wasting their benefits on booze?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 2:02 am to
quote:


They're fat because they CHOOSE to eat fake food. They could afford to eat healthy if they wanted to.



There is a lot to say on this.. No possible way can it all be said properly.

Do they have a fair choice? If they don't then this point isn't a point. So let's examine.

Bad food is being subsidized and made cheaper while organic requires certification and hoops that cost money. That influences the fairness of the choice, not to mention the unfairness of non stop marketing and the convenience (locations and availibility everywhere) of fast food and junk food thanks to the leverage in a system built by and for big corporation.

We can talk about how eating truly healthy (not marketings version of healthy) is inconvenient and sometimes illegal, but that requires an essay, much like most of this stuff.

The point that poor people 'choose' is not very meaningful because it's not a fair choice, the choice is very tainted from the start, everything about the way of life tilts the scale in favor of the system.

quote:


Starvation was COMMON before capitalism. It has been RARE in countries that adopted it.



There are cultures that were properly fed, even with abundance before capitalism. Your point that this is the first time poor people are fat is only true by default, which makes it a bad point.

There was a lot of bad before capitalism, the fact that there was lots of starving before capitalism isn't a point against me because what came before it (in your mind, because I'm sure you're not including anything tribal or premodern history) was pretty awful. Fuedalism, colonialism, the dark ages, on and on.

quote:

I was giving you an opportunity to present your best evidence...you know, what debates are normally all about.


No, you were asking for further examples. You like to sit back and make comments on complex things without any accountability, you want to get into big kids talks without basic knowledge of history and you're unwilling look anything up on your own. Rural populations have been drawn into cities in various ways over the last century which has taken people that used to have food and shelter provided by the land who were statistically impoverished and turned them into wage laborers who are no longer impoverished if they make $2 a day, but now they're working a crappy job and barely affording their basic needs if they're lucky, all in a more stressful and unhealthy environment. But poverty rates are down.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 2:07 am
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
17816 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 3:20 am to
quote:

Did Government greed move jobs overseas to increase profit margin?


Increasing profit margin =/= greed.

Government increasing taxes and regulations = greed by politicians (not to mention their insatiable appetite for power and control exercised via laws and regulations).
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73424 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:14 am to
quote:

I'm sorry, I'm not going to waste time educating you on side things. If you want to research you have the tools to do it.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57092 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 8:36 am to
quote:

The point that poor people 'choose' is not very meaningful because it's not a fair choice, the choice is very tainted from the start, everything about the way of life tilts the scale in favor of the system.
Hogwash. There is only one thing that causes obesity--an excess of calories. The form of intake makes little difference. If people are fat, they are eating more than they need to. (Barring some other medical condition).

The idea that someone is 5-10, 290 lbs and malnourished is silliness.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 8:38 am
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14836 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Bad food is being subsidized and made cheaper while organic requires certification and hoops that cost money. That influences the fairness of the choice, not to mention the unfairness of non stop marketing and the convenience (locations and availibility everywhere) of fast food and junk food thanks to the leverage in a system built by and for big corporation.


Man, you are very determined. I just wish your points were better. Unfortunately, it's typical liberal scapegoatism. People aren't responsible for their choices, system's fault, stacked deck... etc.

You seem to believe there are only 2 options: Shop at Whole Foods or be fat.

My parents were poor, and thus, I was poor. Today my favorite foods almost all include some combination of beans and rice. Care to guess why? I knew plenty kids and families that ate fake food (and I was jealous), but weren't fat. They were active. Fat poor people have to make choices just like the rest of us. Choosing to exercise is at least as important as food choice.

If you see liquor stores and junk food disproportionally available in certain areas, it's because there is demand for it, not the other way around.

Not only has our system eliminated starvation in this country, but we send billions in food-aid all over the world. How much of it is stolen by dictators and warlords is another matter.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48294 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 9:01 am to

quote:

Inequailty, greed, and war have all dramatically decreased since the implementation of capitalism.



quote:

What did I just read?


My post.

Apparently what you need to read is a history book.
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 9:12 am to
I know from experience in med school that you can eat cheaply and be relatively healthy. I couldn't afford junk food, fast food, coke, dessert, alcohol, etc.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 9:13 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57092 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You seem to believe there are only 2 options: Shop at Whole Foods or be fat.
Marketing works!
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Hogwash. There is only one thing that causes obesity--an excess of calories. The form of intake makes little difference. If people are fat, they are eating more than they need to. (Barring some other medical condition).

The idea that someone is 5-10, 290 lbs and malnourished is silliness.


This response had nothing to do with what you quoted.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:



You seem to believe there are only 2 options: Shop at Whole Foods or be fat.


Absolutely not, and I've said nothing to make you think that. You're filling in blanks with false assumptions.

quote:


Not only has our system eliminated starvation in this country, but we send billions in food-aid all over the world.


The food we send has done more harm than good, giving little African babies peanut butter an jelly has caused a domino effect of problems, which is why smarter organizations now focus on planting things like Moringa trees instead of giving them a diet of bleached flour and sugar.

Our system has also stripped areas of their natural resources, the fact we've sent back crappy food that triggers disease isn't a fair trade off.

quote:

Unfortunately, it's typical liberal scapegoatism. People aren't responsible for their choices, system's fault, stacked deck... etc.


People are responsible for their choices, all that stuff is right on. But to fail to access the truth doesn't do anyone any good. It's true that the crops that make the junk food get subsidized while it costs extra to do it organically. Its true that the big fast food chains have great leverage in the system, and everything about our daily lives favors the convenience of fast food. A lot more can be said on this but the point is that the choice is not a fair one, it's not an even playing field.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 5:15 pm
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

I know from experience in med school that you can eat cheaply and be relatively healthy. I couldn't afford junk food, fast food, coke, dessert, alcohol, etc.


I'd like to know what sparked this comment because nothing I said should have triggered this response.

I'm fully aware of this fact, have said it in this thread, and have said it on this board numerous times.
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
64980 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 5:45 pm to
"SpidermanTUba..8 page thread...let me see how many downvotes it has."

first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram