Started By
Message
locked post

Mitch McConnell: We already have term limits; it's called elections

Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:12 am
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3460 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:12 am
Do you agree or disagree with him? How do you argue against that line of thinking?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:14 am to
Point to an actual term limit in the presidency
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79129 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:14 am to
aren't they 2 different things?
Posted by blowmeauburn
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
7885 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:15 am to
Bigger question is this, is it worth Trump spending political capital on term limits?

I mean its going to be a bloody bloody battle to get anything like that passed.

The only way is to try and push something through towards the end of term 1. It will be voted down and Trump would then make it a centerpiece of his reelection run, and campaign for candidates in primaries and the general that agree with it.

The only way I see this happening is if the Republicans in Congress stonewall a lot of his agenda and piss him off, causing him to recalibrate.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:16 am to
They should just make age limits and allow the old guys already in office to be grandfathered in and not have to retire next election. That way it'll get the votes, because they are protected.

I'm thinking 70.

ETA:

Or a combination of the two. There is a two term limit if you're over 70 by the end of the 2nd term. Something like that.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 9:18 am
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17472 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:16 am to
Any senator that doesn't approve of them will have that hanging on their neck come next election
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36013 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:18 am to
Disagree

We have term limits for presidents, but not for Congress.

As govt. grew in size and became more powerful, we limited the terms a president could serve by amending the Constitution.

Now govt. is even larger and more powerful; consequently, we have seen how a few well connected Congresspeople can run the entire Congress. It's time to limit their terms too.

12 years for Senate and ten for HOR would work much better.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
20990 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:19 am to
No, and this should not discourage the introduction of an amendment. If it does not get through congress, so be it, but introduce it.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:19 am to
The only way term limits will ever happen is if the state legislatures force it onto Congress through a Convention of States.

I think Trump has a far better chance of getting through tax reform, (at least) reforming Obamacare, financial deregulation (some of the New York Democrats may be amenable to that) and his infrastructure plan (which is hopefully fiscally responsible.) If I were Trump, I would request both houses of Congress vote on a term limits amendment, and when it predictably fails, he ought to focus on things that are attainable.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146688 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:19 am to
BS some of them have been there so long they are beyond greedy.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:20 am to
He's absolutely right
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:21 am to
I understand McConnells logic, but the fact is that the results are in. People hate congress but love their congressman because they bring home the bacon. Whether the duty should rest on the populace to hold their congressmen accountable or not, the fact is that the current system is obviously broken. Plus, we have term limits elsewhere. Why should congress be exempt?
Posted by Space Cowboy
Member since Oct 2016
4079 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:24 am to
We need to get rid of professional politicians like McConnell and he is one of the biggest ones. He is also a perfect example of why we must get rid of the professional politicians who cater to the special interests, the globalists, and the crony Capitalists, as opposed to the people, even though he is elected by the people.

Our government is supposed to be a government of the people, for the people, and by the people, but that hasn't been true for decades.
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:24 am to
Mitch McConnell looks like a real life Jerry
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36013 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:28 am to
Do we all love out Congressman, or is it that he or she is the only choice we have?

How many live in "safe" districts created through gerrymandering, and where the party in charge handpicks their candidate?

Of course the handpicked guy is usually the incumbent and he walks back in every year. After a decade or more of living in DC the guy and his family become Washingtonians and forget where they came from.

That's generally what happens in a majority of districts.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29151 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:29 am to
quote:

12 years for Senate and ten for HOR would work much better.


Hell just reintroduce the Citizen Legislature Act from the "Contract with America:"

quote:

The Citizen Legislature Act
An amendment to the Constitution that would have imposed 12-year term limits on members of the US Congress (i.e. six terms for Representatives, two terms for Senators). H.J.Res.73 [5] rejected by the U.S. House 227-204 (a constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds majority, not a simple majority), March 29, 1995; RC #277.


Roll call from the vote, of course it was killed by Democrats
Posted by fooz
DFW
Member since Sep 2011
878 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:30 am to
Just grandfather the current so they won't put up as much a fight.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 9:41 am
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:31 am to
quote:

How do you argue against that line of thinking?


Why don't we put it to a vote(s) and let the people decide?
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29151 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Just grandfather the current so they'll won't put up as much a fight.


Makes sense (the 22nd Amendment did the same with Truman).
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10604 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:33 am to
Agree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram