Started By
Message

re: Meet the guy who killed Osama Bin Laden: Rob O’Neill

Posted on 11/6/14 at 1:59 am to
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
8730 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 1:59 am to
quote:

So he's got 3 movies. Zero Dark Thirty, Lone Survivor and Captain Phillips


Most interesting man in the world?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 4:04 am to
redskins fan

but so much for quiet professional
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123814 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 4:55 am to
quote:

His identity is supposed to be classified.
Supposed to be?
One would think he was "supposed to be" financially taken care of by the government.

For example, 5 years service in Congress gains a pension. Now I know Congressional service is dangerous. Hell, members suffer horribly bruised egos all the time. I'm sure it is quite traumatic. But for the government to say to O'Neill, "Your service is literally worth nothing. It is worth no long term fiscal reward. It is worth no recompense at all, and you are not to profit from it after you depart the military," is incredible.

His identity is supposed to be classified?
Got it. Fair enough.
So when he seeks a job in the private sector, what's he supposed to say on his resumé? Who provides his recommendations? Look, I have zero problem with the guy's association with the Bin Laden mission being classified for his own safety. But I have a huge problem if he is not taken care of as compensation. Sounds like the Navy got tired of him, didn't find a spot for him, then just cut him loose after 16yrs in service.

If true, it's inexcusable behavior.

This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 4:57 am
Posted by Samso
nyc
Member since Jun 2013
4726 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:02 am to
Wait I thought Obama killed Bin Laden?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:31 am to
quote:

...I am still skeptical he is the guy.

The "community" is saying it was not him. The kill shot came from the first individual in the stack from one floor down. It was a snapshot when UBL exposed his head through the doorway. This guy (apparently) was second in the stack and the first one to enter the room and (allegedly) he shot UBL a second time.

Bottom line, he was on the raid which means he is an incredibly brave and skilled warrior. And UBL is dead, which is all that matters to me.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:33 am to
quote:

He shot an unarmed guy on dialysis in his house. Color me unimpressed.

Yeah, that whole deep inside of Pakistan in the middle of the night in a compound filled with who knows what... yeah that is completely unimpressive.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:44 am to
quote:

yeah that is completely unimpressive.


Shot OBL while his ride home was still smoking over by the fence. I like it.
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:48 am to
There was a news piece on recently, either 60 Minutes or CBS Sunday Morning, can't remember, that profiled a man who kept his ww2 work a secret for decades. Men and women back then understood the job and honored the job. It's so easy to go run for a book deal or get paid for an interview these days. All they see is $$$. shame.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 8:52 am to
quote:

So when he seeks a job in the private sector, what's he supposed to say on his resumé? Who provides his recommendations?


This is a non issue. He would have plenty of opportunities in the outside world. The sky is the limit for a lot of former SOF guys in a LOT of different sectors. Its not like he has no military record just because he worked for ST6. He can tell anyone he wants what unit he worked for, and he can disclose his unclassified training. As far as recommendations, that is taken care of as well. sof guys are not left out to dry assuming they leave in good standing.

quote:

But for the government to say to O'Neill, "Your service is literally worth nothing. It is worth no long term fiscal reward. It is worth no recompense at all, and you are not to profit from it after you depart the military," is incredible.


If he does an honorable 20 then he gets compensation. Its the same for everyone else barring medical retirement. He deserves no pity. Sounds like a typical SEAL prima donna to me...

Some units have their people sign agreements about not disclosing the deets. They likely have that agreement and he likely broke it. If anything he just closed the door on a lot of private sector jobs in doing so. That was his choice and he made it knowing that he was leaving that unit not in good standing.

The navy has made their own bed with their never ending desire to advertise their successes and glorify their failures. If anything they should blame themselves here.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10565 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Did you just laugh at a dude who's one of the most elite of the elite special ops commandos and most badass and dangerous soldiers walking on this Earth? You just laughed at an elite, highly trained Delta Force Operative or Navy Seal.....

You can question his hubris all you want but he has room to talk as a very dangerous man himself with his capabilities.



No, actually I laughed at his dad. Thanks for your concern though.
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Supposed to be? One would think he was "supposed to be" financially taken care of by the government. For example, 5 years service in Congress gains a pension. Now I know Congressional service is dangerous. Hell, members suffer horribly bruised egos all the time. I'm sure it is quite traumatic. But for the government to say to O'Neill, "Your service is literally worth nothing. It is worth no long term fiscal reward. It is worth no recompense at all, and you are not to profit from it after you depart the military," is incredible. His identity is supposed to be classified? Got it. Fair enough. So when he seeks a job in the private sector, what's he supposed to say on his resumé? Who provides his recommendations? Look, I have zero problem with the guy's association with the Bin Laden mission being classified for his own safety. But I have a huge problem if he is not taken care of as compensation. Sounds like the Navy got tired of him, didn't find a spot for him, then just cut him loose after 16yrs in service. If true, it's inexcusable behavior.


well said
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

If he does an honorable 20 then he gets compensation. Its the same for everyone else barring medical retirement


Why should a SEAL, that lays it on the line much more than some desk jockey in Norfolk, not be treated better? Elite in virtually any other profession equates to dollars. Why not in the military?

There are some nations, like Australia, that have recognized this and made proper changes.

Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Sounds like the Navy got tired of him, didn't find a spot for him, then just cut him loose after 16yrs in service.

For the record, he admits he left of his own accord.

LINK

From a SOF community perspective (purely anectdotal), he was asked to leave because he was running his mouth about the mission and was told to stop (which he refused to do).

I have a feeling the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Posted by Dissident Aggressor
Member since Aug 2011
3755 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Why should a SEAL, that lays it on the line much more than some desk jockey in Norfolk, not be treated better? Elite in virtually any other profession equates to dollars. Why not in the military?


Well, there is this thing called hazardous duty pay...
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123814 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

he was asked to leave because he was running his mouth about the mission and was told to stop (which he refused to do)
Then you find the fellow a different job with the Navy.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

I agree with him. He's not supposed to be a celebrity. The Navy also agrees


There was a story on this. One of the Navy Seals in the raid wrote a book and was donating the proceeds to Navy Seal charities. Well, big daddy government steps in and says you can't do that. Meanwhile Hollywood is leaked info from the white house about the raid, and Leon Panetta writes about it extensively.

The problem the government has with it, is that they aren't making money off of it. They don't want the guys actually out there risking their lives turning a profit, thats the jobs of the bureaucrats. I say, let them make as much money as they can off of this. They earned it.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 1:06 pm to
I recall another squid falling asleep and letting a Japanese destroyer run over his boat. Think he ran for prez or something. Nobody bitched about that one.

Posted by BeYou
DFW
Member since Oct 2012
6024 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 1:57 pm to
Great article in the Washington Post today.

Link

quote:

The Navy SEAL who fired the shot that killed Osama bin Laden is a highly decorated veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan who agonized for months over whether to publicly reveal his role in one of the most storied commando operations in U.S. history.

Robert O’Neill, 38, a Montana native, was near the head of the column of U.S. soldiers that burst into bin Laden’s Pakistan hideout on May 2, 2011.

In a recent interview, O’Neill confirmed to The Washington Post that he fired the fatal shot that struck bin Laden in the forehead. He also acknowledged that shots were fired by at least two other SEAL team members, including Mark Bissonnette, who famously described the raid in the book, “No Easy Day.”

O’Neill was preparing to make his story public next week with interviews on Fox News and in The Washington Post, but his identity was disclosed preemptively by the Web site SOFREP, operated by former SEAL members, in a protest over O’Neill’s decision to reveal his role in the mission.

Over the course of several meetings with The Post, O’Neill said he decided to go public after becoming convinced that his identity was about to be leaked by others. What once was a closely guarded secret had spread widely through military circles, he said, and was known by members of Congress and at least two news organizations. is impending decision had also fostered anger among colleagues.

In an Oct. 31 letter to the Naval Special Warfare ranks, B.L. Losey, the commanding officer, and M.L. Magaraci, the force master chief, emphasized that a “critical” tenet of their profession is to “not advertise the nature of my work nor seek recognition for my action.”

“We do not abide willful or selfish disregard for our core values in return for public notoriety or financial gain,” the letter said.

O’Neill said he confirmed his decision to go public after a private encounter with relatives of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on New York’s World Trade Center. During an emotional meeting with victims’ family members before the recent opening of the National September 11 Memorial Museum, the former SEAL decided spontaneously to talk about how bin Laden met his end.

“The families told me it helped bring them some closure,” said O’Neill, whose identity as the shooter was independently corroborated for The Post by two SEAL team members.

O’Neill had previously recounted his experiences to journalist Phil Bronstein for a February 2013 Esquire magazine article that, by agreement, referred to him only as “the shooter.” In the piece, he described advancing through bin Laden’s Abbottabad, Pakistan, compound with five other SEALs, eventually reaching the third floor, where bin Laden lived with his wives.

As other team members peeled off to search different rooms, O’Neill found himself in the No. 2 position, behind the point man, for the final assault on bin Laden’s bedroom. When bin Laden briefly appeared at the door, the SEAL at the front of the line fired a shot that apparently missed.

“I rolled past him into the room, just inside the doorway,” O’Neill recalled. “There was bin Laden, standing there. He had his hands on a woman’s shoulders pushing her ahead.”

Though the room was dark, O’Neill could clearly see bin Laden’s features through his night-vision scope.

“In that second, I shot him, two times in the forehead,” O’Neill was quoted in the Esquire article as saying. “Bap! Bap! The second time, as he is going down. He crumbled to the floor in front of his bed and I hit him again.”

O’Neill told The Post that it was clear bin Laden had died instantly, as his skull had been split by the first bullet.

At the time of the raid, O’Neil had served nearly 15 years as a SEAL, eventually earning a spot in the elite unit known as SEAL Team 6. He served in other celebrated missions, including the 2009 rescue of merchant marine Capt. Richard Phillips from pirates off the coast of Somalia, as depicted in the 2013 movie “Captain Phillips.”

While other missions were likely more dangerous, the bin Laden raid was the first in which he believed he would likely be killed, O’Neill told The Post. The SEALs assumed that bin Laden’s compound would be both heavily guarded and booby-trapped to ward off attacks.

“I didn’t think I would survive,” he said.


Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Supposed to be?

Um, yeah, as in he wasn't supposed to reveal the nature of his work, but he did anyway. He left on his own terms, so your argument about the Navy cutting him loose is invalid.
quote:

So when he seeks a job in the private sector, what's he supposed to say on his resumé? Who provides his recommendations?

He's allowed to say he was with SEAL. He just isn't allowed to discuss the details of missions like this. He can cite his practical experience and get recommendations from his superiors. He just can't say shite like "oh by the way, I also killed the Ukrainian ambassador with a fountain pen while he was taking a piss."

I agree that he should be treated better by the Navy, but he knew the policies before he quit. This is his decision, and the Navy's statement reflects this.

And he doesn't just say he was the guy who shot OBL. He has written about it in fairly great detail. This doesn't just endanger him personally. It endangers other service members as well as give people an idea of the tactics used, etc.

I'm sure he will make a lot of money from this, so good for him, but it's still a juvenile and irresponsible thing to do.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

The problem the government has with it, is that they aren't making money off of it. They don't want the guys actually out there risking their lives turning a profit, thats the jobs of the bureaucrats. I say, let them make as much money as they can off of this. They earned it.

Sure. National security and codes of conduct be damned. Because, bureaucrats.

His own fellow SEAL members have spoken out, as has the Navy. They don't stand to make any money from this, and the idea that money would otherwise be claimed by other parties but for the actions of O'Neill is absurd.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram