- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McConnell's statement on ObamaCare vote; repeal of ObamaCare with two year delay
Posted on 7/18/17 at 4:02 am to Cruiserhog
Posted on 7/18/17 at 4:02 am to Cruiserhog
Hey dumbass his agenda isn't getting done because of cowards in Congress and the number of people in Washington who hate trump.
1
Posted on 7/18/17 at 4:04 am to dbeck
quote:
I'm calling it right now.
They will try to squeeze some extra legislation into the ACA repeal bill which will cause it to fail.
Bookmark this shite.
This.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 4:05 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
quote:
Is he trying to call his senators bluff?
I hope so - they will reveal themselves as bloody hypocrites if they don't duplicate their 2015 vote
The Senate chamber will smell like fish that day.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 4:11 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
hey dumbass....
if the polls are wrong why isnt Trumps agenda getting done.
Money.
Congress' gravy train wants this shitbag of a law to stick around. Enough Senators are bought and paid for. I think McConnell is among them.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 5:41 am to Sentrius
quote:
s he trying to call his senators bluff?
F no. Without the nuclear option first, a straight up vote needs 60 senators, it's an out, they're still trying to F us all the way they always have.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 5:47 am to Sentrius
The 2015 bill should have been brought to the floor about 5 seconds after Trump finished swearing in
That it wasn't was rank incompetence
That it wasn't was rank incompetence
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:11 am to Sentrius
Make this politicians put their name on the vote! No wishy washy talk. Vote!
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:55 am to Sentrius
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/5/20 at 7:29 am
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:57 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:
F no. Without the nuclear option first, a straight up vote needs 60 senators, it's an out, they're still trying to F us all the way they always have.
If they can pass Obamacare through "reconciliation," it can be repealed through reconciliation.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:59 am to Sentrius
Hiding from the voters. Trying to get past the midterm elections without having done squat.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:06 am to Sentrius
Not a terrible idea. Would ensure Obamacare gets repealed while giving insurance companies time to plan and implement new policy to minimize short term damages to individuals
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:40 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Will be interesting to see what happens.
Well it will mostly likely fail. Caputo and collins are already out against it. I can't imagine Heller and Murkoswki signing up for it.
But they might get it to fail with 49 votes so they can say they tried.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:41 am to Sentrius
It's smart to do it with a 2 year delay IF they come up with an awesome replacement in next 2 years.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:42 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
But they might get it to fail with 49 votes so they can say they tried.
There won't be enough satisfied Republicans with that outcome for that to be a satisfactory endpoint. They probably think it will be enough to "try." They've misjudged their disconnect with hoi polloi for some time now, though.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:43 am to the808bass
quote:
There won't be enough satisfied Republicans with that outcome for that to be a satisfactory endpoint. They probably think it will be enough to "try." They've misjudged their disconnect with hoi polloi for some time now, though.
I completely agree that it won't be enough to satisfy many republicans. But if it fails, they at least have a talking point.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:44 am to uway
quote:
It's smart to do it with a 2 year delay IF they come up with an awesome replacement in next 2 years.
Had Obama not vetoed THIS EXACT BILL in 2015, the two year delay would be ending this year.
How are Republicans doing with coming up with a valid replacement in that 2 year window?
Does their inability to devise anything approaching a workable plan over the last 2 years give you confidence that they'll have more success in the next 2 years?
Posted on 7/18/17 at 1:19 pm to gthog61
Hating trump has zero to do with it
The status of current and recent gop proposals is entirely about the perceptions of gop senators about the bill and if they can be reelected running on this bill. Collins and r Paul are against current version for different reasons.
The status of current and recent gop proposals is entirely about the perceptions of gop senators about the bill and if they can be reelected running on this bill. Collins and r Paul are against current version for different reasons.
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 1:59 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:Unfortunately none of the Jackasses voting no on repeal are up for re-election in '18.
Make them vote on the record, and take them out if they don't vote the will of their people...,
Posted on 7/18/17 at 2:52 pm to Revelator
No. Repeal so you can run on repeal in 2018, without any consequences for the total failure your replacement will be for most Americans.
All praise, no blame.
All praise, no blame.
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 3:48 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Unfortunately none of the Jackasses voting no on repeal are up for re-election in '18.
This isn't a coincidence and it's also why there's isn't a vote.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News