- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Manafort Notes From Russian lawyer meeting refers to 'Donations' and RNC
Posted on 8/31/17 at 2:55 pm to MSMHater
Posted on 8/31/17 at 2:55 pm to MSMHater
quote:
I think you're the only one left who cares about this.
I might be wrong, but I kinda doubt it.
I assume the majority of voting Americans who voted for Clinton still care about it. So does the Special Prosecutor and his staff. I know this board doesn't care. But maybe it's not an accurate sampling.
1
Posted on 8/31/17 at 2:56 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Well at least you know they aren't destroying evidence
Definitely one of the advantages the Dims have over Repubes is the criminal experience needed to cover up their crimes. I knew there are plenty of Republican weasels but they're mere novices in high level government shenanigans.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 2:56 pm to SabiDojo
Someone needs to tell the clintons that
Posted on 8/31/17 at 2:56 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
included the word "donations,"
quote:
near a reference to the Republican National Committee
this is the perfect example of fake news
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:13 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:
I assume the majority of voting Americans who voted for Clinton still care about it. So does the Special Prosecutor and his staff.
And it will accomplish squat! Any hopes or dreams you have of this bearing criminal fruit are as pointless as hoping Bush is locked up for war crimes, or Holder is locked up for running guns. It's nothing but political blue balls for you people, but I guess some people just enjoy the tease. But, on the other hand, this story has provided clear and perfect examples of what journalism has become today. And how few journalists still exists. The gay commie from The Guardian has had, by far, the best "reporting" on the real Russia story.
quote:
I know this board doesn't care. But maybe it's not an accurate sampling.
I'm not a Trump voter. Don't even really like him. Have no desire to defend him. The story is still a loser and no one cares outside of "the resistance" and the Beltway. There is so much legitimate criticism to make, yet this is the direction "the resistance" takes? It's not surprising they can't seem to win elections anymore. Between identity politics and chasing the tail known as Russia, we're going to be stuck with a shitty GOP majority in congress forever.
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:21 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:only to a Republican
It is illegal for foreigners to donate to American elections.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:23 pm to tigerinDC09
I'm literally shaking! I hope the government doesn't see my notebooks from home. I'm sure I have a page with words near other references that could make me look guilty of something without tangible proof.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:23 pm to MSMHater
quote:I'm interested, but until the indictments come down it's all circumstantial leaks that can be easily brushed off / seized on depending on your preconceptions.
I think you're the only one left who cares about this.
I might be wrong, but I kinda doubt it.
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:25 pm to Iosh
Disagree Iosh.
The slater stuff regarding trump tower and Moscow is the biggest story of the whole investigation and was only given little press because of Harvey
The slater stuff regarding trump tower and Moscow is the biggest story of the whole investigation and was only given little press because of Harvey
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:26 pm to Iosh
quote:
I'm interested, but until the indictments come down it's all circumstantial leaks that can be easily brushed off / seized on depending on your preconceptions.
Do you truly expect something substantive to come from this that would result in real damage to the White House?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:26 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The slater stuff regarding trump tower and Moscow is the biggest story of the whole investigation and was only given little press because of Harvey
Any direction on where to go to read more about this?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I don't know that it's big. It's more bizarre than anything else. How does building Trump Tower Moscow help you win an election in the US?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:27 pm to tigerinDC09
Sauces also indicate a giant dickbutt was drawn near a reference to OP and Obama
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:32 pm to MSMHater
quote:I don't know, honestly. Flynn and Manafort are fricked, but beyond that I couldn't even assign a probability.
Do you truly expect something substantive to come from this that would result in real damage to the White House?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 3:39 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
Sauces also indicate a giant dickbutt was drawn near a reference to OP and Obama
Thank goodness he didn't write "get dog food" next to fluffy?
I couldn't survive Trump - SPCA Collusion!
Posted on 8/31/17 at 4:42 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:evidence of using the word donations near the acronym RNC? That proves it
two sources briefed on the evidence told NBC News.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 5:41 pm to Iosh
quote:
I don't know that it's big. It's more bizarre than anything else. How does building Trump Tower Moscow help you win an election in the US?
At the time he sought the deal that wouldn't have been the intent on either the Trump side or the Russian side. In early fall 2015 when this was starting Trump was widely expected to go the way Herman Cain, Michele Bachman, and Newt went in 2012 - a fall in the polls as Republican voters moved from "flirting with" populist protest candidates to "getting engaged" with their establishment nominee. I suspect Trump saw his campaign as likely to fail but able to monetize the run with PR.
The problem happened when he actually kept his lead and won the nomination. By that time he'd soft-pedaled rhetoric about Russia while trying to put himself in hock to Putin for hundreds of millions it was going to take to finance the tower (VTB bank, the would-be lender is >60% owned by the Russian government itself). Once so compromised, it theoretically gets harder to say no when Russians come calling again.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 5:48 pm to CptBengal
quote:
note they havent actually found any donations....
they found the word "donations" on a piece of paper.
...near...
a reference to the RNC.
Didn't Hilldawg out spend Trump like by over 200% and still lost. You would think if Mueller was really interested in chasing down questionable donations, wouldn't it be a lot easier if they looked at the Clinton Crime Foundation's donations from the Uranium One deal, from Saudi Arabia, from China, etc.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 5:52 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:You got him now. He is done.
tigerinDC09
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News