- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge: Jury Sees Secret Files or Trump Wins
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:57 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:57 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Are you all debating the board Eunuch again? Be prepared for 50 pages of Eunuch logic.
0
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:58 pm to Dirk Dawgler
quote:
Good Cannon.
Why does she wear a maga cap in the courtroom…someone might think she is prejudice and a big Trump fan or something?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What amazing timing for this comment
Responding to himself.
Jesus Christ, the EGO on this motherfricker.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:11 pm to WPBTiger
The jury will never see these documents. It can’t be widely known that the security of America was never put in any danger but the president taking personal papers with him.
Add to that the president’s absolute authority to declassify and there isn’t a path to conviction but that was never the goal.
Add to that the president’s absolute authority to declassify and there isn’t a path to conviction but that was never the goal.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You should really open up a fertilizer business and bag all of the Bull Excrement that you spew here. You could make a mint!
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:29 pm to Born2rock
quote:
Why does she wear a maga cap in the courtroom…someone might think she is prejudice and a big Trump fan or something?
Melt, pussy
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Proud of yourself are ya?
What amazing timing for this comment
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:31 pm to OceanMan
quote:
OceanMan
I have photographic/video proof that you are a pedophile. It's top secret for national security reasons.
You want the jury to take my word that it exists?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:43 pm to RollTide71
quote:
Proud of yourself are ya?
That, or our resident self-proclaimed genius forgot to log in to an alter before responding.
Either way, not the best look.
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:45 pm to Godfather1
quote:Agreed!
Either way, not the best look
Posted on 3/19/24 at 3:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The MAGA-friendly federal judge who keeps siding with Donald Trump in his Mar-a-Lago classified records case has forced prosecutors to make a stark choice: allow jurors to see a huge trove of national secrets or let him go.
Do they write articles the other way?
The Ny democrat DA who is no friend of MAGA....
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not the argument. The argument is whether (1) the POTUS was authorized to possess them as personal records, (2) whether claims to the contrary are and should have been negotiable, (3) whether the Biden stand-in assistant archivist had the first clue as to WTF she was doing, (4) whether Trump was negotiating in good faith, and (5) whether government actions were taken in accordance with precedent.
They're either classified (or "national security") or they're not.
In arguments essentially of the government (Biden Admin) vs the government (Trump), you propose the prosecution be advantaged with a "take our word for it, these were essentially the nuclear codes," ruling. Taking that stance essentially establishes the government (Biden Admin) is to be assumed trustworthy, while the government (Trump) must prove (w/o capacity to produce the records in question) the records were (a) personal to the POTUS, (b) confidentially maintained, and therefore (c) no security risk as NARA particulars were worked through.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:43 pm to NC_Tigah
Who's to say Jack didn't slip in more records to make his case too?
Trust us doesn't work any longer.
Trust us doesn't work any longer.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:47 pm to Godfather1
quote:the equivalent of a party crasher stumbling into the room reading aloud from the phone book.
Jesus Christ, the EGO on this motherfricke
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 3/19/24 at 4:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Not the argument. The argument is whether (1) the POTUS was authorized to possess them as personal records, (2) whether claims to the contrary are and should have been negotiable, (3) whether the Biden stand-in assistant archivist had the first clue as to WTF she was doing, (4) whether Trump was negotiating in good faith, and (5) whether government actions were taken in accordance with precedent.
Almost all, if not all, of these are legal questions/issues and have nothing to do with this discussion.
quote:
you propose the prosecution be advantaged with a "take our word for it, these were essentially the nuclear codes," ruling.
No
Posted on 3/19/24 at 5:00 pm to roadGator
quote:...like strewning previously filed and secured records across the floor insinuating that is how they were stored?
Who's to say Jack didn't slip in more records to make his case too?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 5:05 pm to NC_Tigah
Yep
Posted on 3/19/24 at 5:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Really. Do tell.
you propose the prosecution be advantaged with a "take our word for it, these were essentially the nuclear codes," ruling.
---
No
Posted on 3/19/24 at 5:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Really. Do tell.
You're confusing legal and factual issues and trying to form a straw man based around that error
Posted on 3/19/24 at 5:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Go on. Do tell.
You're confusing legal and factual issues and trying to form a straw man based around that error
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News