- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is President Trump still intent on keeping his promise of ending birthright citizenship?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:14 pm
The concept of "anchor babies" HAS TO GO.
In a welfare state, such as America, all this does is create chain illegal immigration of families.
In a welfare state, such as America, all this does is create chain illegal immigration of families.
This post was edited on 6/21/17 at 6:15 pm
12
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:26 pm to 225bred
Who knows. I am still waiting on the wall.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:26 pm to 225bred
Truth.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:27 pm to 225bred
Isn't this Constitutional?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:27 pm to 225bred
Trump can't decide.
It would have to be a repeal of the 14th amendment.
Did any trumpkins take civics I. 6th grade.
It would have to be a repeal of the 14th amendment.
Did any trumpkins take civics I. 6th grade.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:28 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Did any trumpkins take civics I. 6th grade.
No.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:29 pm to 225bred
quote:
welfare state, such as America
Therein lies the problem...wouldnt be an issue otherwise
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:29 pm to mahdragonz
nope we all skipped 6th grade cause we was so smart
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:30 pm to 225bred
It would have to involve amending the 14th amendment
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:32 pm to 225bred
14th amendment was written to allow slaves and children of slaves equal rights and protections.
It has been misapplied by leftist USC justices since then to included those it was never written for.
It is the worst amendment when misapplied and is the source of the most fricked up decisions the courts have ever come up with.
It has been misapplied by leftist USC justices since then to included those it was never written for.
It is the worst amendment when misapplied and is the source of the most fricked up decisions the courts have ever come up with.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Or the Supreme Court could grant certiorari in a contested case involving jus soli birthright citizenship and overturn its holding in U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark. Doubt that will happen though.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:38 pm to Stingray
Liberals claim it is, but that was not intended when the amendment was drafted. It wasn't until the 1920's that Congress passed legislation clearing up that the amendment applied to Native Americans, who were believed to be citizens of their own sovereign nations, not the United States.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the children of legal immigrants are citizens as they are "subject to the jurisdiction therein", but the SCOTUS has never ruled on the children of illegals either way. It has been presumed by the federal government that they are citizens since the 1970's. However, many conservatives believe that because they are here illegally, they are not "subject to the jurisdiction therein" of the United States because they are flaunting its immigration laws. They are still subject to the jurisdiction of their home countries. Thus, birthright citizenship should not apply to them.
We need SCOTUS to rule on this to clear up the issue once and for all.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the children of legal immigrants are citizens as they are "subject to the jurisdiction therein", but the SCOTUS has never ruled on the children of illegals either way. It has been presumed by the federal government that they are citizens since the 1970's. However, many conservatives believe that because they are here illegally, they are not "subject to the jurisdiction therein" of the United States because they are flaunting its immigration laws. They are still subject to the jurisdiction of their home countries. Thus, birthright citizenship should not apply to them.
We need SCOTUS to rule on this to clear up the issue once and for all.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:59 pm to Loserman
The 14th Amendment was never legally ratified by three fourths of the states as is required by the constitution. There were 37 states in the Union at the time and only 21 states legally ratified it. It was pushed through and declared by the Secretary of State in 1868. Two northern states legislatures actually rescinded their initial action of ratification which they had legal right to do. The 14th Amendment is illegal and should have never been added to the constitution.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:21 pm to AU86
quote:
The 14th Amendment was never legally ratified by three fourths of the states as is required by the constitution
You got a link? I'd like to read it.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:22 pm to Collegedropout
quote:
cause we was kangz
Fify
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:26 pm to 225bred
prolly not. But he'll tell you he is!
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:03 am to 225bred
you poor sucker
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:07 am to Loserman
quote:
14th amendment was written to allow slaves and children of slaves equal rights and protections.
Can you see the lefts talking points before they happen? I can..
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:25 am to Abadeebadaba
I need some help. DM me if u follow.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:50 am to mahdragonz
quote:No it wouldn't. We can still grant the child full citizenship ... but not the parents/family. Give them the choice, take your child back across the border with you (renouncing his/her citizenship) or leave the baby here (renouncing your parental rights), we'll put them in foster care, and you'll still go back across the border.
It would have to be a repeal of the 14th amendment.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News