Started By
Message

re: Is it possible to have a good dictatorship

Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by cheeznet
Member since Nov 2015
267 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:37 pm to
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Sir John Dalberg-Acton

I do not believe a single person on this planet could avoid being corrupted by that power. Not a single one.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55454 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I do not believe a single person on this planet could avoid being corrupted by that power. Not a single one.



Luckily, I have in my possession the hair and balls of Cincinnatus. As soon as cloning is perfected, we shall rejoice.
Posted by Anfield Road
Liverpool Fan
Member since May 2012
1940 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:41 pm to
In modern history, Pinochet. But I can't think of many others.
Posted by GermantownTiger
Member since Jan 2015
3337 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:43 pm to
Yes. See Nazi Germany circa 1941
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55454 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Yes. See Nazi Germany circa 1941



Most of Hitler's rad policies came before the war started, might wanna abridge that timeline.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 3:47 pm
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26267 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Is it possible to have a good dictatorship

No

A "good" dictatorship would have to rely on the assumption that the dictator will always use his/her powers for good, which is unrealistic. We're all human.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37628 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:48 pm to
What about Francisco Franco? The Catalans hate him but otherwise maybe not so bad after the Civil War.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35489 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:52 pm to
There have been many "good" dictators. The problem is it's much rarer to have two in a row.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Of course. Enlightened absolutism and benevolent dictatorship have been discussed as viable if not ideal forms of government for years. The problem is that so few men could successfully wield autocratic power benevolently that it's not worth it to consider it as a perpetual solution.



This. It has happened throughout history. But it's not a stable long-term form of government.
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:56 pm to
dictator is basically synonymous with king, and there have been many good kings.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55454 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

dictator is basically synonymous with king, and there have been many good kings.



A dictator, more often than not, will have far fewer checks on his power and authority than a king. I mean, holy shite, English aristocrats and freemen were able to force the Magna Carta in the 13th century. But the English always had more suspicion of their rulers than others.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 4:02 pm to
Of course it is, the benevolent dictatorship is actually found to be the best government. The problem with them has always been the transfer of power at the end of their reign.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram