- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it possible to have a good dictatorship
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:37 pm to volod
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:37 pm to volod
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Sir John Dalberg-Acton
I do not believe a single person on this planet could avoid being corrupted by that power. Not a single one.
I do not believe a single person on this planet could avoid being corrupted by that power. Not a single one.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:41 pm to cheeznet
quote:
I do not believe a single person on this planet could avoid being corrupted by that power. Not a single one.
Luckily, I have in my possession the hair and balls of Cincinnatus. As soon as cloning is perfected, we shall rejoice.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:41 pm to volod
In modern history, Pinochet. But I can't think of many others.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:43 pm to volod
Yes. See Nazi Germany circa 1941
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:46 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
Yes. See Nazi Germany circa 1941
Most of Hitler's rad policies came before the war started, might wanna abridge that timeline.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:47 pm to volod
quote:
Is it possible to have a good dictatorship
No
A "good" dictatorship would have to rely on the assumption that the dictator will always use his/her powers for good, which is unrealistic. We're all human.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:48 pm to HempHead
What about Francisco Franco? The Catalans hate him but otherwise maybe not so bad after the Civil War.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:52 pm to volod
There have been many "good" dictators. The problem is it's much rarer to have two in a row.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:56 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Of course. Enlightened absolutism and benevolent dictatorship have been discussed as viable if not ideal forms of government for years. The problem is that so few men could successfully wield autocratic power benevolently that it's not worth it to consider it as a perpetual solution.
This. It has happened throughout history. But it's not a stable long-term form of government.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:56 pm to volod
dictator is basically synonymous with king, and there have been many good kings.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:59 pm to airfernando
quote:
dictator is basically synonymous with king, and there have been many good kings.
A dictator, more often than not, will have far fewer checks on his power and authority than a king. I mean, holy shite, English aristocrats and freemen were able to force the Magna Carta in the 13th century. But the English always had more suspicion of their rulers than others.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 4:02 pm to volod
Of course it is, the benevolent dictatorship is actually found to be the best government. The problem with them has always been the transfer of power at the end of their reign.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News