Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Ingeniero's list of winners and losers

Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:31 pm
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18284 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:31 pm
Winners

The internet - online communities will have to be taken into much higher consideration after this election. It's been shown (imo) that huge online communities can have even the slightest chance of influencing public opinion and the election, and sometimes all you need is the slightest sway to win.

Blue collar workers - their voices were heard this election. By flipping WI, MI, PA, OH, and nearly MN, Trump has allowed the working class to speak and let the nation know that they aren't happy with the way they've been treated.

Political underdogs - now that a chink in the political armor has been exposed more outsiders can wade their way into politics. Hopefully candidates like Rand can use this to their advantage and mount successful campaigns in the future.

Conservatives - this one isn't an argument over if Trump is a liberal or not. Regardless, if Hillary would have won, her policies would've created a climate that would stack the deck in the Democrats' favor, perhaps irreparably.

Julian Assange - Trump winning probably saved his life. Literally.

Losers

The media - after months of biased reporting it came back to bite them. Viewership is down, trust in the media is at an all time low, and people are sick of their rhetoric.

Pollsters - their models can promptly be scrapped. Nate Silver, especially, has had his reputation tarnished (pun intended). By refusing to take into account certain factors in this election, I truly believe they were trying to suppress turnout and influence opinion, and they've made themselves look foolish. Less consideration will be given to their opinions in future races.

The establishment - both left and right. They've been shown that the people don't want a government that tries to tell them what to want. And now that the curtain has been pulled back on corruption, people will think twice about trusting them. If Trump follows through with draining the swamp, "politician" will no longer be a career, just like our founding fathers intended.

George Soros - this old bastard can keep dumping money into losing battles for as long as he wants, I hope his fortune dries up and his descendants are left penniless and powerless.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78076 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:32 pm to
Losers

Bush/Clinton cabal
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29165 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

chink in the political armor


racist
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:32 pm to
You're on the money.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64215 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:34 pm to
I'm no silver fan, but wasn't he one of the only pollsters giving trump even a punchers chance leading up to the election?
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:39 pm to
Yes, Nate silver said trump had about a 30% chance and was fighting liberals on it. I don't know why people hate him so much for what he does. If the polls themselves are wrong that isn't on silver but the pollsters
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35541 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:40 pm to
Losers-SJWs
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Political underdogs - now that a chink in the political armor has been exposed more outsiders can wade their way into politics. Hopefully candidates like Rand can use this to their advantage and mount successful campaigns in the future.


Yes, I totally agree, and said that was one of the biggest reasons we need Trump to win.

Hopefully Trump's victory will bring a lot of good, talented people out of the woodwork who see that it's possible to win without being "part of the club."
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

I'm no silver fan, but wasn't he one of the only pollsters giving trump even a punchers chance leading up to the election?


Yes. I'm still not much of a fan, but in his defense during the days leading up to the election he was basically saying that something just didn't feel right about the numbers and was getting slammed over it.

Huffington Post called him out and directly accused him of "putting his finger on the scale" to make the election look closer than it really was. The HuffPro author has since tweeted an apology.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:


Hopefully Trump's victory will bring a lot of good, talented people out of the woodwork who see that it's possible to win without being "part of the club."


While that's a nice sentiment, it just isn't going to happen on a large scale.

Trump won because he had the right message, but he wasn't the only candidate with that message.

What separated Trump from the crowd was (1) he already had incredible name recognition. (2) he had the ability to self fund most of his campaign. The establishment hated him from the start. If he wasn't a billionaire willing to spend his own money, he would have never gotten out of the gate.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

While that's a nice sentiment, it just isn't going to happen on a large scale.

Trump won because he had the right message, but he wasn't the only candidate with that message.

What separated Trump from the crowd was (1) he already had incredible name recognition. (2) he had the ability to self fund most of his campaign. The establishment hated him from the start. If he wasn't a billionaire willing to spend his own money, he would have never gotten out of the gate.


I believe that's why it says in the OP

quote:

Political underdogs - now that a chink in the political armor


That's kind of the point. Now that Trump has won, it may change things. It certainly proved that the American people have no problem electing a political novice, which is unprecedented in modern U.S. politics.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112469 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 2:08 pm to
Another loser... Gun/Ammo dealers. They stood to make a fortune after a Hillary win.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18284 posts
Posted on 11/10/16 at 2:15 pm to
No lie, I typed up a section for that exact reason but then deleted it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram