Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

If you're a woman in Hwood claiming assault and not naming names after this, you're lying

Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:23 pm
Saw Allyssa Milano today, on good morning America no less, first say she was a victim of sexual assault. She then refused (pointedly) to name her abuser.

She then complained about women who were victims of sexual assault being silenced. Stone cold straight face, into a microphone, on national television.

Here's the thing: it's in vogue right now to be a victim. It gives you attention, fame, money, everything. With the complete destruction of Weinstein, and the fervor and craving right now to bring down any famous guy guilty of sexual assault.....

With all that said, Any woman who claims publicly to have been sexually assualted but won't name the guy (or girl) who dun it is doing one thing:

Lying to get attention.

You will never have a better climate to make your accusation than right fricking now. The torches and pitchforks are out and the mob is begging for a house to reduce to ash. But these bitches are going in front of the mob that is demanding blood, and saying "there's a house you really, really need to burn down right now." The mob leans closer, crickets chirp. The woman clears her throat, all eyes on her. "But I won't tell you where it is."
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:24 pm to
yup
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30360 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:29 pm to
There are statutes that wont allow them to name people without facing potential legal reprisals.

Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5344 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:29 pm to
I've been watching the Weinstein saga on Twitter including the #Metoo folks. The feminists are already trying to use it as a way to frame all men as harassers and abusers.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 8:36 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

There are statutes that wont allow them to name people without facing potential legal reprisals.



What?
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27940 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:30 pm to
I think these people know that it's likely to burn Hollyweird to the ground. And there goes their money train.
They have given up any moral code,or scruples they ever had.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30360 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

What?


Slander and defamation laws
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Lying to get attention.
Not necessarily.
But there is substantial cowardice involved.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79677 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Saw Allyssa Milano today, on good morning America no less, first say she was a victim of sexual assault. She then refused (pointedly) to name her abuser.

She then complained about women who were victims of sexual assault being silenced. Stone cold straight face, into a microphone, on national television.

Here's the thing: it's in vogue right now to be a victim. It gives you attention, fame, money, everything. With the complete destruction of Weinstein, and the fervor and craving right now to bring down any famous guy guilty of sexual assault.....

With all that said, Any woman who claims publicly to have been sexually assualted but won't name the guy (or girl) who dun it is doing one thing:

Lying to get attention.

You will never have a better climate to make your accusation than right fricking now. The torches and pitchforks are out and the mob is begging for a house to reduce to ash. But these bitches are going in front of the mob that is demanding blood, and saying "there's a house you really, really need to burn down right now." The mob leans closer, crickets chirp. The woman clears her throat, all eyes on her. "But I won't tell you where it is."


What HE said.

At this point, if you're not willing to name names, then what good are you really doing? You're making an empty gesture while doing nothing to stop enabling a predator.

This shite is way too serious to be paying mere lip service to.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 8:38 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29754 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:43 pm to
They benefit more from being a victim than they do from resolving any professional inequality, perceived or otherwise.

Progs would rather have an excuse than an opportunity.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23703 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:46 pm to
I don’t know. A lot of women named Trump as the person who sexually abused or harassed them and his minions attacked and threatened them. I watched it here. Maybe some women don’t want the abuse that sometimes comes from naming names? It’s their decision, not yours.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 8:47 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56480 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Lying to get attention.



I don't think it's reasonable to assume they are lying.

I do think it's reasonable to not care. If they don't care enough to point out the abuser, why should I care.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:48 pm to
Dilly dilly
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21993 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:50 pm to
Maybe they aren't naming names because they got a sum of money to not name names.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79677 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

A lot of women named Trump as the person who sexually abused or harassed them two weeks before the election


You left something kind of important out. But don't worry, I caught it.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30360 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Maybe they aren't naming names because they got a sum of money to not name names.



This is true in many of the cases, and there has been a longstanding fear of the ruthless lawyers suing the pants off of people to protect their abuser clientele
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21874 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:59 pm to
If you are a Hollywood A lister and have never spoken up then you should now know that we know you are a whore
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 9:05 pm
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32735 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:00 pm to
Why wouldn't they name their abusers to save other young, vulnerable women? I thought silence = violence?
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19046 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:01 pm to
It's extremely self serving. They get to anoint themselves victims (and they very well may be) without having to level specific allegations against anyone. On top of that, they get to continue to protect the so called unnamed predators and protect their very lucrative careers. So really nothing has changed since all of the allegations started flying other than everyone's a victim now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram