Started By
Message
locked post

How is it possible to 'raise taxes' on single moms?

Posted on 11/27/16 at 7:52 pm
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45220 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 7:52 pm
ABC News
54m54 minutes ago
ABC News ?@ABC
Trump plan would mean tax increases nearly 8 million families—including a majority of single-parent households LINK

These are the biggest net benefactors of the welfare state's redistribution schemes. In some cases single moms earning minimum wage can net over $60,000 in total earnings when welfare is factored in
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14433 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 7:54 pm to
They're still campaigning against him
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41130 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 7:58 pm to
You can't read?


From your own link:

quote:

hikes that would hit single parents and large families would result from Trump's plan to eliminate the personal exemption and the head-of-household filing status. These features of the tax code have enabled many Americans to reduce their taxable income.

His other proposed tax changes would benefit middle- and lower-income Americans. But they wouldn't be enough to offset those modifications.

"If you're a low- or moderate-income single parent, you're going to get hurt," said Bob Williams, a fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45220 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 7:59 pm to
That doesn't address my question
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55475 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

"If you're a low- or moderate-income single parent, you're going to get hurt," said Bob Williams, a fellow at the Tax Policy Center.


So, we're trying to disincentivize single parenthood. Rad.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41130 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:02 pm to
Are you this obtuse? If you eliminate that deduction, you've effectively raised taxes on single parents filing as head of household.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:03 pm to
It EXPLICITLY answers your exact question

Don't double down on stupid just because you didn't read your own linked article closely.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98825 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:05 pm to
Everyone should have skin in the game.

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69303 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:06 pm to
Why do we incentivize single parenthood? BTW, why'd you run away from my thread?
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45220 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:06 pm to
Did you not read my OP?

If you're receiving 10s of thousands of dollars in aid, while only making $20,000 a year, how is it possible to 'raise taxes'
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124251 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:07 pm to
You could put a tax on FB posts where they talk about how hard it is to be a single mom.
This post was edited on 11/27/16 at 8:27 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55475 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Why do we incentivize single parenthood? BTW, why'd you run away from my thread?



Replacing strong family units with helplessness and dependency on daddy government
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124251 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:09 pm to
Thanks LBJ's "Great society"
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Why do we incentivize single parenthood?
Well the head of household deduction is still lower than if filing jointly so I think it's a fair middle ground without greatly incentivizing single parenthood.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Why do we incentivize single parenthood?


That wasn't the question, the OP asked a specific question which was answered in the article he posted and that fact was pointed out to him. This is a different discussion.

quote:

BTW, why'd you run away from my thread?


I didn't "run away" from anything, I gave you an answer you didn't like and you proceeded to start using anecdotes and hypotheticals to argue.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69303 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

you proceeded to start using anecdotes and hypotheticals to argue.
Actual social programs and actual cause and effect of those actual programs is "hypothetical".

Not trying to derail thread but you could look around your house now and find at least thirty objects either invented by, or made by a process invented by, a brilliant mind that grew up in grinding poverty and would have been destined to it if not for help, thereby wasting that brilliant mind.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41130 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:24 pm to
I'd rather the gov't not incentivise or deincentivise anything with tax policy, or subsidies, or executive order, etc, etc, etc. Whenever they inject the gov't as a decider over the market, they create more problems then whatever they are trying to solve.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Not trying to derail thread but you could look around your house now and find at least thirty objects either invented by, or made by a process invented by, a brilliant mind that grew up in grinding poverty and would have been destined to it if not for help, thereby wasting that brilliant mind.
This was actually a similar argument used for someone who was advocating for Universal Basic Income on a Freakonomics podcast. Frankly, it's hypocritical of me, but I think I find that more preferable than the current entitlement structure we have in place.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260576 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:36 pm to
Is EITC diminished? If not, these people aren't paying Taxes.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55475 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

I'd rather the gov't not incentivise or deincentivise anything with tax policy, or subsidies, or executive order, etc, etc, etc. Whenever they inject the gov't as a decider over the market, they create more problems then whatever they are trying to solve.



I'd prefer that, too, but that's not the world we live in, unfortunately. We certainly can't remove the extra gibs that single mothers can get, which would be a far, far greater correction - but these are the tools at our disposal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram