- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:31 pm to The Baker
He specifically says, "In the gay world..." then talks about the beneficial relationships of older men and young boys. He obviously has an opinion which is outside the norm but heterosexuals(if they're being honest anyway) will largely tell you that, "yes this is pretty much what we thought was going on in that side of the sandbox."
Dems will think that this is a "Gotchya" against the alt-right but the reality is that this just confirms many views regarding gays; that they are inherently perverted.
Dems will think that this is a "Gotchya" against the alt-right but the reality is that this just confirms many views regarding gays; that they are inherently perverted.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:33 pm to The Baker
The part about his own early sexual experiences isn't that bad the problem is when he starts generalizing as well as his talk about parties he's attended as an adult where older men had sex with young boys.
I mean 1/3 of this forum lost their minds over "Pizzagate" but here you have a person who talks about attending the sorts of parties "Pizzagate" supposedly involved and some of you are going out of your way to defend him.
I mean 1/3 of this forum lost their minds over "Pizzagate" but here you have a person who talks about attending the sorts of parties "Pizzagate" supposedly involved and some of you are going out of your way to defend him.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:35 pm to montanagator
quote:
The part about his own early sexual experiences isn't that bad the problem is when he starts generalizing as well as his talk about parties he's attended as an adult where older men had sex with young boys. I mean 1/3 of this forum lost their minds over "Pizzagate" but here you have a person who talks about attending the sorts of parties "Pizzagate" supposedly involved and some of you are going out of your way to defend him.
And as usual the left would prefer to attack the messenger then deal with the larger issue that Pizzagate was true!
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:36 pm to The Baker
quote:
I don't think I can defend this one...
I wonder if there is a full length one that isn't cut up.
Jesus, he sounds like one of those teachers who gets caught fricking students.
Its one thing to say that on a case by case basis some people aren't hurt by statutory rape (legally that's what he's discussing), its another to generalize and advocate for societal acceptance of said rape.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:37 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
And as usual the left would prefer to attack the messenger then deal with the larger issue that Pizzagate was true!
What did Milo and Dennis Hasert attend the parties?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:42 pm to The Baker
quote:
We all had that hot teacher in high school that we would consent with, which I think is his point just the gay version. (Still gross.)
Right and again if he was talking about 17 or even 16 maybe he'd be okay (though the power dynamics would still be super skeevy)- hell AoC in the UK is 17 anyway, the clip you linked though is way, way younger.
Put it this way if your little brother started talking about having sex with the hot English teacher when he's a Junior or Senior in HS- that's a crime but maybe people look the other way in real life, if on the other hand he's in 7th grade and starts telling you about it-- you call the cops or at least the school.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:44 pm to montanagator
quote:
Put it this way if your little brother started talking about having sex with the hot English teacher when he's a Junior or Senior in HS- that's a crime but maybe people look the other way in real life, if on the other hand he's in 7th grade and starts telling you about it-- you call the cops or at least the school.
OMG you sick freak!
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:46 pm to montanagator
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 2:52 pm to The Baker
Go figure a bunch of cucks defending a homo that brags about giving head to a priest as a young man. 
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:25 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
It was a ringing endorsement of 13-year-olders being able to give consent to much older people because the 13-year-older thinks he or she is sexually aware. There is no other way to spin
Then why does he defend the current age of consent later in the piece?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:53 pm to The Baker
Sounds like his definition of a pedophile is someone who wants sex with kids who haven't hit puberty. Sex with a consensual young teen can be okay and he's not talking about a 17 year old having sex with a 14 year old. He's disgusting.
I'm glad that Milo makes the Libs boil, but personally I can't stand to listen to him. He is is just over the top nasty.
I'm glad that Milo makes the Libs boil, but personally I can't stand to listen to him. He is is just over the top nasty.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 3:58 pm to The Baker
quote:
I don't think I can defend this one...
Oof... At this point, I'll be happy to return to my blissful ignorance of 4-5 weeks ago, when I had no idea who this dude was.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:19 pm to The Baker
I'm trying to get up to speed on this.
I don't understand the big deal.
As far as the priest, I don't see it as any different than a guy that hooked up with a hot female teacher when he was 15 and at 30 looking back at it as a positive experience.
Much like many of us wouldn't look back at nailing a hot teacher at 15 as being a victim, he doesn't consider that situation as him being a victim as a teenager that was already comfortable being gay.
I don't understand the big deal.
As far as the priest, I don't see it as any different than a guy that hooked up with a hot female teacher when he was 15 and at 30 looking back at it as a positive experience.
Much like many of us wouldn't look back at nailing a hot teacher at 15 as being a victim, he doesn't consider that situation as him being a victim as a teenager that was already comfortable being gay.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:23 pm to The Baker
There's a lot wrong with this guy. He's not someone conservatives should hitch their wagons to.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:23 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Then why does he defend the current age of consent later in the piece?
Because this was a personal experience and he is only speaking about his personal view of it as it pertains strictly to him and that situation? He can do that while simultaneously agreeing that similiar situations can often be completely different and exploitative of the minor and therefor agree to general laws regarding consent.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:27 pm to Scoop
FTR, I only read few transcripts.
One where he was talking about younger gay males having older gay males as sort of gay mentors.
Then saying that he had been to parties where older gay males had sex with younger gay males. Not sure if he was underage at the time or what.
One where he was talking about younger gay males having older gay males as sort of gay mentors.
Then saying that he had been to parties where older gay males had sex with younger gay males. Not sure if he was underage at the time or what.
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:34 pm to mauser
quote:
Sounds like his definition of a pedophile is someone who wants sex with kids who haven't hit puberty.
Dude, that's the actual definition of pedophelia. The dictionary definition of pedophelia is an attraction to prepubescent children.
The definition like Merriam-Webster definition.
This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:41 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Obv a hit piece coordinated from the SJW left and cucked right. Erick Erickson is positively giddy.
Obvio, we are talking about the party that defends NAMBLA's right to exist. We're supposed to believe they are upset about Milo's comments?
Posted on 2/20/17 at 4:51 pm to The Baker
quote:
I don't think I can defend this one...
I wonder if there is a full length one that isn't cut up
Wow. That's pretty bad. I be been a Milo fan up until now but it sounds like he brought that one on himself. I'd like to ask his supporters if after hearing that, they would be comfortable leaving their sons in Milo's care?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News