Started By
Message

re: Gay male couples face more challenges, higher costs to start a family

Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11176 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Personally, I don't see any reason for the government to spend tax dollars helping ANYONE have children. But if it chooses to do so, it must do so "equally."


I’m sure your smart enough to know there are certain people that do not pass screening for adoption. Not having a mom in the household should 100% be red flagged as it deprives from the child they are trying to help. We don’t treat pedos and felons the same in the process either.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

AggieHank86

mmmmn schluuurp, ah, schlurrp
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:42 pm to
Why is more people trying to adopt children a problem?
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71543 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:42 pm to
definition of family

quote:

a group of one or more parents and their children living together as a unit.


Gays are not a family so they dont have higher associated costs.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11176 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Why is more people trying to adopt children a problem?



The goal of adoption isn't so that two grown arse men can cosplay Leave it to Beaver
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
108 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:11 pm to
Gay couples were not intended to start families.
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

The goal of adoption isn't so that two grown arse men can cosplay Leave it to Beaver


Better to leave them in the system with no parents than 2?
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Gay couples were not intended to start families.


Says who?
Posted by ruffleforeskin
Member since Dec 2021
574 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:42 pm to
Yeah fricking right. I know two gay dudes that adopted two kids and get a few thousand dollars each month for adopting them. They're living it up, just bought a condo on the beach.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62482 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:43 pm to
Just when you think these people couldn’t be any dumber, they go and headline an article like this…. My God! Of Course it’s harder to start a family if you are gay, cause you can’t naturally reproduce… I’m amazed actually. Who ever wrote this won’t be embarrassed, as it’s a victimhood cry for attention, but damn….
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9221 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:44 pm to
Good. Gay couples should not be allowed to have a family.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79288 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Bit of a derail, but why? If all parties agree, why should the government get involved and "limit" it? (Assuming no coercion and no minors, obviously)

Or are you acknowledging that a few hetero-couples will be negatively-impacted and are willing to accept that side-effect in order to deny access to homo-couples (for whom it is essentially the only way to have kids who share your genetics).


I believe it's a very perilous slope for humanity where people are increasingly opting to distance themselves from the human procreation process by contracting the bulk of it out to others. And of course, the woman who carries the child is ultimately (usually) entirely removed from the future life of the child. I think that's treading in very dangerous waters.

I'm not completely against surrogacy, I'm in particular open to its merits when involving family/friends. And I 100%, genuinely grieve for the women who cannot carry children. But I think we're already seeing it slip into very questionable territory. It's more and more a practice of the wealthy exploiting young women (gay and not). I don't think it's good for the culture, the child, or the exploited woman.

And yes, I'm certainly concerned about the use of surrogates for gay couples, but it's not limited to that.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111095 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Bret Shuford and Stephen Hanna knew from early on in their relationship they wanted to raise a child together. But the married couple didn't think a biological child was a possibility.
This wording is funny to me.


Like they weren't sure, but they didn't think it was possible, but wouldn't fully rule it out!
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53859 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:17 pm to
If you can’t afford to adopt a child you shouldn’t be able to have one!!
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11176 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Better to leave them in the system with no parents than 2?


Nope but they should be moved to the back of the line
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71312 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:20 pm to
They want to make adoption easier?

Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79288 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

quote:
Gay couples were not intended to start families.


Says who?


Probably the one who handed out the biological equipment that precludes it
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1633 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Probably the one who handed out the biological equipment that precludes it


You think God would prefer kids stay in foster care than go to someone who would love and take care of them?
Posted by BengalOnTheBay
Member since Aug 2022
3855 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Almost two-thirds, 63%, of LGBTQ+ people plan to use assisted reproductive technology, foster care, or adoption to become parents


Should not be legal.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79288 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

You think God would prefer kids stay in foster care than go to someone who would love and take care of them?



I genuinely don't know the answer to whether God would want a kind gay couple to become the "dads" of a child without parents. I suspect not, as I think living as a gay couple in a gay relationship is sinful, and I don't think that should be modeled for children. But I don't know with certainty, of course.

And I think it's a separate question of whether, for example, it would be permissible for a celibate gay man to adopt.

But anyway, the question was about intent and design (or that's how I interpreted it), and obviously two men in a romantic relationship aren't "designed" to have children.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram