- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Former officials say Susan Rice was NOT just doing her job
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:30 pm
quote:
“From my direct experience dealing at this level, that is never done,” retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer told Fox News. Shaffer has experience in intelligence operations focused on foreign actors in which U.S. citizens’ involvement could surface. “The national security adviser person is a manager position, not an analyst position,” he said. “You have analysts in the intelligence community whose job is to sort through who is doing what with what. Susan Rice is a senior manager looking over the entire intelligence community. She should not have time to be unmasking individuals having conversations. It’s insane. It’s never done.” Ex-CIA analyst Fred Fleitz agreed in a Fox News op-ed. “Rice’s denials don’t add up,” Fleitz wrote. “It is hard to fathom how the demasking of multiple Trump campaign and transition officials was not politically motivated.”
Former Ambassador to the United Nations and Fox News contributor John Bolton told “America’s Newsroom” that Rice’s requests may have been improper depending on what reason she gave for wanting the information. “Now I’m not naïve, a national security adviser’s gonna get her request approved. But she still has to give some reason,” said Bolton, who served under former President George W. Bush. “If she doesn’t even have to give a reason than NSA is really quite negligent. Susan Rice is obviously not gonna say, ‘I want these names unmasked so I can surveil my political opponents.’ And if she said she wanted the names unmasked for national security reasons, that’s a fraud on the intelligence system.” Shaffer said a U.S. citizen’s interaction with a foreign target is not typically reason enough to unmask an American.
townhall.com
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:32 pm to L.A.
Decatur will be here soon to assure us that Rice is above board.
Don't worry. Rs will need to find another target.
Don't worry. Rs will need to find another target.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:33 pm to L.A.
As other intelligence officials have stated, she was definitely up to something.
And the "chance" meeting on the tarmac is a bogus claim. Two high profile targets aren't exposed at one time without coordination
And the "chance" meeting on the tarmac is a bogus claim. Two high profile targets aren't exposed at one time without coordination
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:34 pm to L.A.
Then charge her.
What are they waiting for?
What are they waiting for?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:35 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Then charge her.
soon...
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:36 pm to CptBengal
quote:
soon...
Will it be soon like -
- locking Hilary up?
- proving 3 million illegals voted in California?
- repealing Obamacare?
- proving wiretapping?
How soon is now?
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:38 pm to L.A.
quote:
“It is hard to fathom how the demasking of multiple Trump campaign and transition officials was not politically motivated.”
It could not be more obvious that this was politically motivated.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:39 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
- proving wiretapping?
check this one off.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:39 pm to mahdragonz
quote:An investigation, I imagine.
What are they waiting for?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:40 pm to mahdragonz
And he saith unto them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then he arose, and rebuked the winds and the sea; and there was a great calm.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:40 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Will it be soon like
This?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:40 pm to Alabamya
quote:
check this one off.
Still no evidence, but keep the dream going, bro!
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:43 pm to NIH
So I'm guessing you are saying that everyone was wrong, including Fox and other conservative outlets that predicted the Clinton win.
But Trump is still puckered up, like a buttercup, for is Russian friend.
But Trump is still puckered up, like a buttercup, for is Russian friend.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:44 pm to mahdragonz
quote:When will he be charged?
But Trump is still puckered up, like a buttercup, for is Russian friend.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:45 pm to mahdragonz
No evidence except Rice's admission, right?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:48 pm to roadGator
quote:
Decatur will be here soon to assure us that Rice is above board.
No way, they'll dig up dirt on the Lt. Col.
When you can't shoot the message shoot the messenger.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:48 pm to mahdragonz
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:57 pm to L.A.
They need to uncover every American Susan Rice had unmasked to see if it wasn't political. If she ordered nothing but republican nominees unmasked then we know it was all political.
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 4/5/17 at 5:14 pm to L.A.
The WH should release the data to the Intel committee's. NSC showed Nunes and Schiff, but are resisting to show the rest of the committee members.
They could come up with non partisan review pretty fast. What is the WH waiting on?
Rice gives the media something to talk about over Easter break is my opinion.
They could come up with non partisan review pretty fast. What is the WH waiting on?
Rice gives the media something to talk about over Easter break is my opinion.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News