- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judges can be impeached/removed for "abuse of power"
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:22 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:22 am to Navytiger74
Not even close.
0
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:22 am to LSURussian
quote:Well since we're being technical, the trial takes place in the Senate. They'd have to defend themselves before the Senate. They don't have many rights when it comes to the investigation and proceedings actually conducted in the house.
they will have to defend themselves in front of the House of Representatives.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:23 am to LSURussian
don't be too tough on the gump, he really is a loving and caring person
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:23 am to Revelator
quote:Is that all 9th circuit decisions or all 9th circuit decisions granted cert?
A previous poster posted an older article showing that the 9th circuit court was overturned at a greater than 75% ratio
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:26 am to LSURussian
Look it says 11:26 now. Not too bright are you?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:28 am to jeff5891
quote:If you keep editing your original post each new edit will show a later time.
Look it says 11:26 now.
quote:
Not too bright are you?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:30 am to Navytiger74
quote:Those House members opposed to the impeachment present arguments why they oppose it. It's not like the House just votes on an article of impeachment up or down without any debate.
Well since we're being technical, the trial takes place in the Senate. They'd have to defend themselves before the Senate. They don't have many rights when it comes to the investigation and proceedings actually conducted in the house.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:36 am to Iosh
Ninth decisions granted cert. The SCOTUS grants very rarely
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:36 am to LSURussian
quote:
If you keep editing your original post each new edit will show a later time.
Which should tell you I edited more than once before you responded.
Pretty slow Russian. But then again you are trying to say this is an abuse of power, which is completely retarded. Get your coffee in this morning?
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:37 am to jeff5891
quote:No, you didn't. When I replied to your post you had not edited it yet. Just admit you fricked up and move on. I make mistakes, too.
Which should tell you I edited more than once before you responded.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:39 am to LSURussian
By the time you clicked reply, typed what you we wanted , then click submit, I had already edited.
Nice long deflect though
Nice long deflect though
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:40 am to LSURussian
quote:I never said you were, squirt
I'm not a Republican, hack.
quote:No. Are we going to impeach every judge who has a decision overruled now?
So if it "plays out" that the EO is upheld and the judge is overruled, then you would be in favor of impeaching the judge, right?
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 11:41 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:40 am to jeff5891
quote:"you we"
you clicked reply, typed what you we wanted
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:43 am to JuiceTerry
Can someone explain the ruling? I'm hearing that the Judge ruled on some economic harm to some colleges, and not the Constitutionality(which is pretty clear)??
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:43 am to LSURussian
Blame swype
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:44 am to JuiceTerry
quote:Then what was your purpose of bringing up the party of the President who appointed the judge, hack? I don't believe that judges who abuse their power is limited to any particular party.
I never said you were, squirt
quote:No, only in cases where a majority of the members of the House of Representatives believes a judge has abused his power.
Are we going to impeach every judge who has a decision overruled now?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:47 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Wow, Russian. Always considered you an a-hole, but I never took you for a fool. This is a Bengal-level post right here.
Vegas Bengal? I saw someone say awhile ago that you are like Vegas Bengal in your posting. Who was Vegas Bengal again?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:47 am to LSURussian
Sure, let's waste some more taxpayer money and politician's time. You're gonna have a tough time if you're going to 
everytime Donald gets brake-checked. I mean, this is friendly fire.
everytime Donald gets brake-checked. I mean, this is friendly fire. Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:51 am to JuiceTerry
quote:I don't believe it would be a waste. The judicial branch of the Federal government is wayyyyyy out of control.
Sure, let's waste some more taxpayer money and politician's time.
Plus, congressman don't get paid by the hour....
Posted on 2/5/17 at 11:52 am to LSURussian
quote:
only in cases where a majority of the members of the House of Representatives believes a judge has abused his power.
The people's representatives.
No one should have a problem with the people standing in judgement of their judges.
Otherwise there would be no check on their power.
And from these threads we all know how leftists feel about checks and balances.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News