- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Faith in "Science" = "man made religion" (Evolution related)
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:11 pm to DawgfaninCa
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:11 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Sure I do. You just have no evidence that life evolved from non-life
Quit using that word
0
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:20 pm to HeadChange
quote:
Again... Evolution takes over when life exists, not when it doesn't. I'll ask again, how dense are you? Are you the same guy that thinks the government would be responsible for your daughter becoming a prostitute?
You just don't want to admit that most scientists' claim that life evolved from non-life is based on blind faith.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:21 pm to DawgfaninCa
There isn't a biologist alive who believes life evolved from non-life. Not a single one.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:22 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
evolved
Dude, seriously. This is embarrassing. You obviously can't grasp the concept even in its most basic form.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:24 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Yes, abiogenesis is a very plausible explanation whose mechanism has been demonstrated multiple times with multiple different controls in the lab. That doesn't mean we have nearly the extensive evidence for origins that we do for evolution (which is considered undisputed in principle in the scientific community) but that we have a very good working idea of what very well could have occurred. What science still struggles with is the origins of matter and the universe, but that is a physics question not a biological one.
So since Science has no definitive proof for the origins of life, why all the name calling for people who hold a different view?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:27 pm to HeadChange
What was troubling about the video was many of these students and professors basically admitted to having faith in text books and "experts" that came before them demonstrating very little command of what they actually understand to be truth in "Science".
"yes, I guess you do have to believe"
"yes, I guess you do have to believe"
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:28 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
There isn't a biologist alive who believes life evolved from non-life. Not a single one.
Really?
What do they claim life evolved from?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:36 pm to HeadChange
quote:
Dude, seriously. This is embarrassing. You obviously can't grasp the concept even in its most basic form.
Evolve means to change or develop slowly often into a better, more complex, or more advanced state.
LINK
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:38 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
What do they claim life evolved from?
Again
Evolution is a process of life, not the start of it. fricks sake man.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:40 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Evolve means to change or develop slowly often into a better, more complex, or more advanced state.
Quoting for reference that you actually might now have a basic sense of evolution, before you start asking where this life came from, which isn't evolution.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:43 pm to Revelator
quote:
why all the name calling for people who hold a different view?
I will never insult someone who disputes abiogenesis. The origins of life aren't settled. Evolution, at least the principle mechanisms, is. Rejecting evolution in 2014 is simply willful ignorance, rejecting abiogenesis is a defensible position.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:43 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
What do they claim life evolved from?
Life didn't evolve from anything, life arose from molecular precursors which arose from biochemical reactions between atoms.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:45 pm to HeadChange
Perhaps that the point he is making HC?
origins of life had no "evolution " process...It just was there or dare I say "created" from nothing to something.
Because we weren't there to observe, all of us "believe" in something relative to origins of life.
origins of life had no "evolution " process...It just was there or dare I say "created" from nothing to something.
Because we weren't there to observe, all of us "believe" in something relative to origins of life.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:48 pm to ApexTiger
This isn't about the origins of life though. Neither side has a claim greater than the other for the origin, but at least science is trying. But that's not what this thread is about. It's about evolution.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:52 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
origins of life had no "evolution " process.
Stop conflating definitions.
1.
quote:
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
2.
quote:
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.
One has nothing to with abiogenesis. The other merely describes a change in state.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:56 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
You just don't want to admit that most scientists' claim that life evolved from non-life is based on blind faith.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:58 pm to Revelator
quote:
So since Science has no definitive proof for the origins of life, why all the name calling for people who hold a different view?
Because the view is absolutely ridiculous and should very much be ridiculed since it has done a lot of harm to society as a whole.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 8:00 pm to OMLandshark
watching this video
this is seriously stupid
this is seriously stupid
Posted on 7/25/14 at 8:02 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
What was troubling about the video was many of these students and professors basically admitted to having faith in text books and "experts" that came before them demonstrating very little command of what they actually understand to be truth in "Science". "yes, I guess you do have to believe"
Let me guess, you also buy that chain email that Albert Einstein proves that God exists to his freshman science professor?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 8:03 pm to OMLandshark
this is ray comfort... the banana man
Page 5 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News