Started By
Message

re: Drug legalization not working out well at all in Oregon

Posted on 11/12/23 at 6:28 pm to
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
1351 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 6:28 pm to
I have no problem with anyone doing drugs. So long as you are not driving, working, creating a public nuisance, etc. Treat it the same as alcohol.

But no more narcan or life saving treatment. That's a burden to the taxpayers. Send the meat wagon around to collect the bodies and throw them in the incinerator. This is what a true conservative should support. Allow people to do as they wish but don't protect them from themselves. They must suffer the consequences of their actions. I'm tired of feeding the prison industrial complex with non-violent offenders. Let nature take its course and let them die off.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24969 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

"It was not a crazy thing to try at all, but I think they misunderstood addiction,” said Keith Humphreys, a Stanford professor

A Stanford professor.
quote:

a Stanford professor

This cannot be overstated.

A Stanford professor doesn't think it was crazy to wholly decriminalize all illicit narcotics. A Stanford professor won't admit to not having the foresight to reasonable postulate the high probability that this would end up being a total and completely dumpster fire on a train wreck.

This is why you should ALL send your kids to trade school instead of wasting your money and their futures at "prestigious" universities.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16777 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Stanford professor doesn't think it was crazy to wholly decriminalize all illicit narcotics. a


He can’t admit he was wrong because he probably lobbied for it.

I bet he can tell you exactly what Eugene didn’t do correctly and why it will really work next time.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19110 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Change appears likely. A coalition of city officials, police chiefs and district attorneys recently called on the state legislature to recriminalize hard drugs. A measure to do so is in the works for next year’s ballot.


It’s things that this that make you stop and think that perhaps generations past weren’t just a bunch of old fools. They addressed problems with real solutions because they understood the consequences of failing to act.
Posted by reverendotis
the jawbone of an arse
Member since Nov 2007
4867 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Shocking. Usually addicts are super pumped about getting help with their addiction.


I heard they make good neighbors too. Keep their property well maintained, mind their own business, etc. Personally, I don't see why anyone wouldn't want to have a bunch of junkies live next door to them.
Posted by reverendotis
the jawbone of an arse
Member since Nov 2007
4867 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:48 pm to
This is where drug legalization leads.

It is the same place that drug illegalization leads.

It is the only road.

Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35528 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

People sprawled on sidewalks and using fentanyl with no fear of consequence have become a common sight in cities such as Eugene and Portland. Business owners and local leaders are upset, but so are liberal voters who hoped decriminalization would lead to more people getting help. In reality, few drug users are taking advantage of new state-funded rehabilitation programs.
I don't have a strong stance on decriminalizing hard drugs either way. I know what we're doing isn't working, but, I just haven't seen enough real-world examples to be convinced by either side. That said, it sounds more like they de facto full-on legalized both hard drugs and public intoxication by neutering law enforcement. Why does 'decriminalization' equal being allowed to shoot up in front of of a business or anywhere else in public? You can't even get away with that with Bud Light in most of the country.

Oregon voters are retards and their stance on defunding police is incompatible with decriminalizing hard drugs.
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 8:54 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15052 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:29 pm to
Cant have legal drugs and defund the police!
Posted by BayouTigers225
Member since Oct 2023
293 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

liberal voters who hoped decriminalization would lead to more people getting help. In reality, few drug users are taking advantage of new state-funded rehabilitation program
people like this love among us
they actually thought that making drugs legal would lead to more people stopping
Posted by BayouTigers225
Member since Oct 2023
293 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

bet he can tell you exactly what Eugene didn’t do correctly and why it will really work next time.
we needed more ways for people to seek help
they would have quit and gotten help if they knew that was a possibility
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 11:53 pm
Posted by killedbyindians
Earth
Member since Jun 2022
1185 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:01 am to
quote:

The number of fatal overdoses in Oregon during the 12 months that ended in May rose 23% from the same period a year earlier to 1,500,


See even this story has a silver lining. If they’d take the same lax attitude towards charging me with murder I’d be passing out fentanyl like candy on halloween to any homeless that wanted some.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50774 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:01 am to
People turn against these things because they can see the harm being done.

By contrast, they get to ignore the much worse harm being done by abortion because it isn't in their face.
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Drug legalization not working out well at all in Oregon


Would not have taken a rocket surgeon to have figured that out.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57393 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:23 am to
quote:

Business owners and local leaders are upset, but so are liberal voters who hoped decriminalization would lead to more people getting help.
Name a time when removing consequences has encouraged people to change their behavior?

quote:

The number of fatal overdoses in Oregon during the 12 months that ended in May rose 23% from the same period a year earlier to 1,500, according to preliminary federal data.
In Oregon alone, Leftist policies have kill many, many more people than “white nationalists”. Who is the real danger?
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 12:27 am
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19410 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:36 am to
Chestersons fence, yet again.

We created these laws and developed these social prohibitions for practical reasons. They were a response to behaviors that damaged society.
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
6564 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:42 am to
quote:

Liberals love using punishment for behavior modification, I don't get why they think it won't work with criminals and addicts?


It’s easy as shite to manipulate people with few options in life. Career criminals and addicts are two of those groups.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12698 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 7:00 am to
Why do liberals cry, weep, and complain when they get exactly what they want??

I’m STILL asking this question with no good answer.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 7:01 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 7:37 am to
quote:

It’s things that this that make you stop and think that perhaps generations past weren’t just a bunch of old fools. They addressed problems with real solutions because they understood the consequences of failing to act.


One of my favorite Chesterton shorts:

quote:

In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.” To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it.
Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4536 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:04 am to
Post of the month; relate that to every issue
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11005 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:07 am to
quote:

arly three years into an experiment that proponents hoped would spark a nationwide relaxation of drug laws, many in Oregon have turned against the decriminalization initiative known as Measure 110, which passed with 58% support in 2020.

People sprawled on sidewalks and using fentanyl with no fear of consequence have become a common sight in cities such as Eugene and Portland. Business owners and local leaders are upset, but so are liberal voters who hoped decriminalization would lead to more people getting help. In reality, few drug users are taking advantage of new state-funded rehabilitation programs.

Change appears likely. A coalition of city officials, police chiefs and district attorneys recently called on the state legislature to recriminalize hard drugs. A measure to do so is in the works for next year’s ballot. A recent poll found the majority of Oregonians support the idea.


You have to hit rock bottom before you can hope to recover successfully.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram