- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:41 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Yeah, they're so gonna get in trouble for doing something they weren't supposed to do
Could be as bad as a sternly worded memo.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:42 am to Marye
quote:Nothing wrong with skepticism about whether the processes have been followed. My problem is with the posters asserting that the underlying processes themselves were somehow irregular.
why should one not be just a little skeptical that this "filter team", the FBI/DOJ and some magistrate or judge would not be high-fiving after hours at the local watering hole?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:43 am to udtiger
Spoiler alert. . . he trusts the DOJ/FBI.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:44 am to AggieHank86
quote:
underlying processes themselves were somehow irregular.
Is it regular to raid a former president's home?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:44 am to AggieHank86
quote:
So they had a filter team review the documents in question, pursuant to the terms of the warrant itself, in order to avoid appointment of a special master … who had not yet even been requested by the time they completed the filter review?
Yes, because no one could have possibly foreseen that Trump would file such a motion. Just totally unheard of!
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:45 am to JColtF
quote:
You'd be okay with an opposing attorney having an internal 'filter team' review your clients privileged documents?
Hank doesn't have time for clients as he spends every waking moment on this board.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:46 am to Strannix
quote:
identified a "limited set" of documents that could include information protected by attorney-client privilege.
Well maybe that is what they were after. Screw these people
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:49 am to wickowick
quote:
Is it regular to raid a former president's home?
Only the orange ones.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:55 am to AggieHank86
Just out of curiosity can you link to something of the “filter” team. Looking through the DOJ and fbi stuff I can’t really find it.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, that is the PURPOSE of a filter/taint team.
So you think it is fine for attorney/client documents to be seized and reviewed by the government based upon a warrant with broad limits on areas that can be searched?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
So you think it is fine for attorney/client documents to be seized and reviewed by the government based upon a warrant with broad limits on areas that can be searched?
quote:
So you think it is fine for attorney/client documents to be seized and reviewed by the government based upon a warrant with broad limits on areas that can be searched?
They raided one of his lawyers and no one batted an eye. Do you think these loons actually care about attorney client privilege or executive privilege.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:26 pm to udtiger
quote:
almost as if the failure to request a special master from the start was by design
Interesting theory to say the least.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:41 pm to BBONDS25
quote:That is a different question, versus the assertions/complaints of the OP, to the effect that the FBI/DoJ behaved improperly by following an established procedure.
So you think it is fine for attorney/client documents to be seized and reviewed by the government based upon a warrant with broad limits on areas that can be searched?
Yes, there are potential problems/abuses associated with the use of filter teams. It is a balancing issue. In most cases, I think the system probably works reasonably-well. There just is not much incentive for a member of the filter team to ignore his sworn duties/obligations.
In this case, I think appointment of a special master is appropriate, as I have been arguing for several days.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:45 pm to udtiger
quote:If I had been advising the FBI prior to seeking the warrant, I think that I probably would have suggested that they request a special master rather than a filter team at the time they sought the warrant, because of the politically-sensitive nature of the investigation.
almost as if the failure to request a special master from the start was by design
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Like it or not, the DoJ and the FBI are not just “opponents” in the adversary system, they are tasked with doing justice.
Does that task include fabricating evidence to submit to a FISA court to spy on a president???
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:47 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There just is not much incentive for a member of the filter team to ignore his sworn duties/obligations.
Ellllooooofrickingllllll
We are through the looking glass people.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:50 pm to Strannix
quote:
Does that task include fabricating evidence to submit to a FISA court to spy on a president???
This is the ultimate the FBI is a Dem enforcment arm proof that anyone with a brain can see.
They also had a Lawyer change the wording of an email to go after someone in Trumps orbit.
These people are nothing more than criminal thugs posing at law enforcement.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There just is not much incentive for a member of the filter team to ignore his sworn duties/obligations.
Jesus Christ
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News