Started By
Message

re: Disclosure of nuclear sub locations?

Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Kyrie Eleison
Waco, Texas
Member since Jul 2012
1560 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:56 am to
source is not anonymous...it came from the official call transcript released by the Philippine govt.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72062 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Would you have preferred they didn't get it verified?


IMO, being verified by an anonymous source is the same as not being verified at all.

Look, I hold this stance no matter the political party. Anonymous sources are not sufficient. They are not verifiable.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Look, I hold this stance no matter the political party. Anonymous sources are not sufficient. They are not verifiable.
The DNC emails were anonymously sourced.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21873 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:59 am to
Complete Nothing Burger.

Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30875 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:00 am to
Honestly, it sounds like:
A.) He was trying to assure the Philippines of our dedication to the region.
B.) Giving information that the only REAL naval power in that region, China, would likely already know. I cannot imagine that they don't ping the crap out of that area with sonar.
C.) Reminding the North Koreans that we don't have to fire anything from here. We could literally pop a sub off their coast and blow away any structure we choose without having to step foot in their craptastic country.

So, I doubt it was less a gaffe and more of a "Yo Kim, STFU. Mmkay?" moment.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:00 am to
Key ones also admitted to, such as getting questions from CNN before debates.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22939 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:03 am to
Are nuclear subs undetectable?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Key ones also admitted to, such as getting questions from CNN before debates.
Hence my description of his epistemology as "nothing is true unless explicitly admitted to"

Am I gonna have to open a Google tab for you too? Because you know what's coming if you take over polishing this turd
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 11:09 am
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17017 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

The DNC emails were anonymously sourced.



And they were actually e-mails, you know, documents. And the DNC itself admitted they were real.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7577 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:09 am to
First, he could give precise coordinates and full inventory of armaments for every sub in the fleet and there is nothing that any other country in the world could do about it. Second, if subs are underwater 1000m deep, there isn't another country in the world with the technology to verify if the subs are actually at the disclosed locations.

Sheep or Shill?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

And they were actually e-mails, you know, documents.
As is a transcript
quote:

And the DNC itself admitted they were real.
Same question to you
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 11:10 am
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62413 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:16 am to
What's Korean for a "Crazy Ivan"? I think we got this...Unless its Russia, then they'll know...
Posted by uptownsage
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2014
2156 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

So Trump evidently disclosed locations, which I'm not seeing discussed.


Classmate of mine was stationed on an attack sub. Said usually only a few of the officers know their exact location. Said Boomers just "disappear" and nobody knows where they are. Just wondering if satellites can track subs even if they are deep underwater.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6816 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

"We have two submarines — the best in the world. We have two nuclear submarines, not that we want to use them at all," the newspaper quoted Trump as telling Duterte, based on the transcript.


This quote according to the transcripts turns into;

quote:

So Trump evidently disclosed locations,


You people have got to be kidding me.

And this is how the NYT reports it;

quote:

U.S. President Donald Trump told his Philippine counterpart that Washington has sent two nuclear submarines to waters off the Korean peninsula, the New York Times said, comments likely to raise questions about his handling of sensitive information.


And libs can't for the life of them figure out why anyone with any brain matter whatsoever can take anything the NYT or Wash Post, for that matter, serious.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140371 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:32 am to
You need to stop inhibiting the liberals' ability to gnash their teeth.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:34 am to
quote:



Classmate of mine was stationed on an attack sub. Said usually only a few of the officers know their exact location. Said Boomers just "disappear" and nobody knows where they are. Just wondering if satellites can track subs even if they are deep underwater.


Our subs can disappear, totally and completely in that not even we would know there exact location at any given time. This is especially true if one is parked off the coast of North Korea and isn't responding to or sending out any radio messages.

And this brings me to another point. Who doesn't understand that Carrier groups include submarines?

Not to mention the obvious, this shite has been in the news for weeks.
Posted by Jeff Boomhauer
Arlen, TX
Member since Jun 2016
3552 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

And I would have loved for Pizzagate to be true, but there was no way it was factual.



Wow! So you would have loved it if it turned out that kids were molested for years and years just so your side could possibly win an election?

There is absolutely nothing in this world that could happen to me to cause me to wish kids were molested in order to prevent it.

You are scum
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58913 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Does anyone with a working brain not already believe there aren't nuke subs in that area?




Shhhhh! Top Secret!
Posted by baseballcatch77
Dallas
Member since Oct 2013
748 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 12:03 pm to
If you don't think we currently have, or aren't in the process of sending, nuclear submarines to the Korean peninsula, you sir are a fricking idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram