- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deserter Bergdahl Says Taliban "More Honest" Than United States Army
Posted on 10/22/17 at 8:52 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 10/22/17 at 8:52 am to Navytiger74
quote:But lying about it is.
That’s lunacy. The possession of a capability isn’t itself proof of any kind of abuse or intent to abuse.
1
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:26 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Leading the charge to our dystopian future.
James Clapper
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:39 am to Strannix
quote:
Wow and this POS got soldiers killed looking for him. Incredible
According to Trump " they knew what they signed up for".
But from all the reports I see it's a stretch to say that they were directly searching for this guy when they were killed. A secondary mission at best.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Look, I'm on the opposite side of this from you, and I'm correct again. Amazing.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:44 am to HubbaBubba
I see that Beavis and Butthead muddied up this thread. 
it was impossible for the duo- Cucky and NT to defend Bergdahl and make Obama appear worthy of a bag of garbage, ALL just to troll the thread in full contrarian mode...
So, they went after Snowden; and I see fail to speak of the tee total pieces of political idealogue garbage-- Clapper or Brennan. Cucky knows from intel from his cosmic top secret clearance-- that Snowden is a traitor--don't you see. And NT mirrors him like a parrot called Polly.
it was impossible for the duo- Cucky and NT to defend Bergdahl and make Obama appear worthy of a bag of garbage, ALL just to troll the thread in full contrarian mode... So, they went after Snowden; and I see fail to speak of the tee total pieces of political idealogue garbage-- Clapper or Brennan. Cucky knows from intel from his cosmic top secret clearance-- that Snowden is a traitor--don't you see. And NT mirrors him like a parrot called Polly.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:45 am to Navytiger74
People championing Snowden are putting the rights of civilians ahead of the lives of service members.
Which, when you think about it, actually isn't off from reality anyway.
Which, when you think about it, actually isn't off from reality anyway.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:47 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Not really the kind of thing one can disclose openly. An open congressional hearing wasn’t the appropriate venue to discuss. Congressman frickface should have known that before asking.
But lying about it is.
Why is it never the question itself can be considered indiscreet?
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:49 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
quote:
Snowden
Is a coward and a traitor.
MSM media has told you this is what to believe, therefore you believe.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:49 am to Tiguar
quote:The lives of civilians should be ahead of those of servicemembers. But why are you under the impression that the bulk of our collections activities (some which were compromised) are focused on force protection measures for troops? They aren’t.
People championing Snowden are putting the rights of civilians ahead of the lives of service members.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:50 am to Statestreet
quote:Which media would that be? Seems more likely that you got your opinion from the media.
MSM media has told you this is what to believe, therefore you believe.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:53 am to Navytiger74
Oh, so you're privileged to the content of the bulk of our collection activities?
How do you find the time for all that and still spew your daily bullshite on this board?
How do you find the time for all that and still spew your daily bullshite on this board?
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:54 am to Tiguar
Whose lives were risked with Snowden exposing a CIA agency capable of the full monty of a vengeful POTUS and government directly spying on not only civilians but his political opponents? I just think they had to change their spying programs around a bit, no lives at risk in the battlefield,no?
They were busted using remote surveillance and control, as well as putting a Russian or any footprint to set anyone up for their political scope and narrative.
Vault7 - Home
How does any of this put service members lives at risk?
They were busted using remote surveillance and control, as well as putting a Russian or any footprint to set anyone up for their political scope and narrative.
Vault7 - Home
How does any of this put service members lives at risk?
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:55 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
James Clapper. Leading the charge to our dystopian future.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:56 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
changing laws and helping to protect our privacy rights.
All he did was drive what little oversight the public had underground, he accomplished nothing.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 9:57 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Navytiger74
You are just so laughably wrong about this. Snowden did a great thing in what he did. I don't care if it might have harmed the NSA thwarting Russia, I do care though that millions of American citizens were being surveilled without a warrant and every American should be against that.
But, then again, Progressives aren't really Americans. Sure y'all might have a birth certificate, maybe a social security card. But mark my words, y'all aren't Americans at all.
"They who can give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Snowden was a hero, whether he meant to be or not.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 10:00 am to 10MTNTiger
Who held a Rose Garden ceremony for this guy after trading him for 5 high level GITMO detainees?
I forget...
I forget...
Posted on 10/22/17 at 10:01 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:We have this document called the NIPF. It outlines the broad priorities of our intelligence activities. But without reading the NIPF it shouldn’t be hard for you to deduce that most efforts aren’t toward tactical protection of forces. Think Russia, China, Iran, DPRK, and transnational terrorism broadly. In addition to lesser priorities.
Oh, so you're privileged to the content of the bulk of our collection activities?
How do you find the time for all that and still spew your daily bullshite on this board?
Posted on 10/22/17 at 10:03 am to sugar71
What an arse hole you are. Disingenuously dancing on the graves of soldiers so you can take a shot at Trump. Despicable.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 10:04 am to Statestreet
quote:
MSM media has told you this is what to believe, therefore you believe.
Interesting. I'd be willing to bet only one of us is completely reliant on information from the media.
Hint: It isn't me.
Posted on 10/22/17 at 10:04 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:How would you define “surveilled?” Bunch or metadata being sucked up that would be set aside or discarded as useless the moment it became clear there was no nexus to foreign adversary activities?
I do care though that millions of American citizens were being surveilled without a warrant and every American should be against that.
quote:Hot take. I know some progressives. They’re mostly Americans, though some are foreign-born.
But, then again, Progressives aren't really Americans. Sure y'all might have a birth certificate, maybe a social security card. But mark my words, y'all aren't Americans at all.
This post was edited on 10/22/17 at 10:13 am
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News