Started By
Message

re: Continuing theme of U.S. firms reincorporating overseas for tax purposes

Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:49 am to
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

While the rate is high I think the bigger objection is the US wanting to tax foreign earnings of US corporations.


Well, it is taxed as a dividend income when it is paid out. That does make some sense.

US corporation receives dividend or interest payment from wherever, it pays tax on it. Don't really see the big problem here.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58671 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

US corporation receives dividend or interest payment from wherever, it pays tax on it. Don't really see the big problem here.


Do other countries do the same? Do U.S. companies complain about this method and try to avoid it? What are the benefits and detriments of doing it this way as opposed to another way?
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35610 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Remedy is to cut corporate taxrates -- dramatically!


Obviously. I'm probably more liberal than 90% of this board and I clearly see the high corporate tax rate is nothing but counterproductive. We live in a world where you can do business practically anywhere and get very similar results. The US doesn't have the competitive advantage to have such high tax rates.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

These tax-lowering overseas deals, which are called inversions, have raised concerns among some U.S. lawmakers over the potential for lost tax revenue.
These idiots STILL seem to think you can govern a nation as if it has a damned fence around it. In a world as globalized as ours, the dumb fricks are chasing their tails.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

There is a fundamental problem with companies taking their money overseas while still taking advantage of the higher standard of living (skilled labor, infrastructure, health, education, etc) that the US has to offer.

There will always be somewhere else cheaper to do business.


So Mr Boucher what is your solution? Suppose you force Google to move to Bermuda. Will that make you happy?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) also hasn't pushed for a quick fix. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed in May, he said that "this loophole must be plugged." But he indicated that he is still hopeful for a comprehensive tax rewrite that would limit inversions on a retroactive basis.


It's a pretty good rule of thumb that when a nation has to use the power of the government to keep people IN, that the problem isn't the people.

This Wyden guy would've fit in well in the Soviet Union or East Germany.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57219 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Why shouldn't a sovereign nation try to stop this?
Because greed is bad?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58671 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:09 am to
I love how it's called a "loophole."
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Why shouldn't a sovereign nation try to stop this? Because greed is bad?


Sheesh. These idiots are amazing. How do they not comprehend just how f'n shitty policy has to be to make a company want to up and leave the USA?

It's the rough equivalent of an OT 10 having a personality so damned shitty that you dump her for an IRL 3.

There is a history of nations with such shitty policy, successful people left in droves or tried to leave. The list is long and NOT very illustrious. It is sad that somehow, we appear to be adding the USA to that list.
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

The Obama administration joined the growing debate over U.S. companies reincorporating overseas for tax purposes, urging lawmakers to pass legislation to limit the moves. 


Why not fix the problem that causes them to leave?

This type of stuff is so stupid and to the outsider the solution doesn't seem to be " let's stop them from having the ability to leave" but rather "let's make them want to stay".
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Do other countries do the same?


For the most part, yes. Tax Havens don't of course, but yes the UK and all the EU countries do the same (tax dividend income of their corps).

quote:

Do U.S. companies complain about this method and try to avoid it?


Not really. U.S. companies know it is actually a pretty favorable treatment, the deferral of tax on their foreign earnings until it is paid to them as a dividend. Sure they ask for a tax holiday so they pay zero tax on the dividend, but I think most like the deferral treatment (which is favorable compared to normal treatment of earnings, which is taxation in the year earned).

quote:

What are the benefits and detriments of doing it this way as opposed to another way?


Well, benefit is deferral. Companies can use the pretax money to do whatever they want with offshore for as long as they like since it isn't taxed until paid out as a dividend. Detriments I guess would be it would be nice to never get taxed on it at all I guess, but that isn't going to happen.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Are there any stats as to what impact lowering the US corporate tax would have?

As in, if they lowered it, how many of these companies would quit parking money overseas and actually bring it here?

I'd imagine it's close to a wash?


Several links in this link.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

keep America's money in America and get rid of these tax havens and shelters. These legitimate taxes could pay for education, lunches for kids et


If these companies were guaranteed that this is what the money woulld be used for, I'm sure they would think twice about moving, but they know that once the money leaves their hands it will immediately get pissed away by those dipshits in Washington. Of course the Feds are going to try to keep those companies in the US. It's that tax money that allows politicians to buy votes and stay in power. So stop giving everyone the stars and bars, apple pie bullshite.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:52 am to
The corporate tax rate should be zero. The benefit to the economy and the people would be massive.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram