- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: Russia investigation going so badly that investigators are buying insurance
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:55 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:55 pm to TigerDoc
I think he's partially right. They couldn't bring themselves to confiscate the hacked DNC server that "delivered a Russian double agent to the White House", but they are completely willing to kick Paul Manafort's door down a year after the fact just to generate more negative press for Trump as the Russia narrative slowly dies.
I no longer believe that any of these bureaucrats are doing the work of the people in good faith. They've all been politicized.
I no longer believe that any of these bureaucrats are doing the work of the people in good faith. They've all been politicized.
0
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:38 pm to notsince98
I thought this thread was going to be about investigators buying life insurance because the investigation was pointing them towards the Clintons.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:40 pm to WYTiger222
quote:
I thought this thread was going to be about investigators buying life insurance because the investigation was pointing them towards the Clintons.
I have but only one upvote to give good sir.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:26 pm to notsince98
It seems a bit absurd that you would need insurance from being sued just for investigating a person.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:28 pm to skrayper
quote:
It seems a bit absurd that you would need insurance from being sued just for investigating a person.
you could be if you had no probable cause, violated civil rights, etc.
You dont get to do whatever as an investigator because Hillary lost.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:30 pm to CptBengal
quote:
you could be if you had no probable cause, violated civil rights, etc.
You dont get to do whatever as an investigator because Hillary lost.
The investigators get their marching orders from above, so "no probable cause" should rest on the person who orders the investigation, not the investigators.
As for violating civil rights, that's not really in the purview of the context. We're talking about being sued for investigating people who didn't end up doing what they're being investigated for.
Imagine if you could sue the detectives and police force every time someone was found innocent.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
Just ignore c want.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:32 pm to skrayper
quote:
The investigators get their marching orders from above
lol, no they dont.
quote:
so "no probable cause" should rest on the person who orders the investigation, not the investigators.
they dont get to do illegal things. sorry. the "Im following orders" defense doesnt fly.
quote:
As for violating civil rights, that's not really in the purview of the context. We're talking about being sued for investigating people who didn't end up doing what they're being investigated for.
and you can violate their rights while doing that.
holy shite.
quote:
Imagine if you could sue the detectives and police force every time someone was found innocent.
people are never found innocent. Only guilty.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News