- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: If Trump threatens remittances, Mexico will walk from negotiations
Posted on 1/25/17 at 2:38 pm to Ace Midnight
Posted on 1/25/17 at 2:38 pm to Ace Midnight
Wall just got 10 feet higher
Posted on 1/25/17 at 2:42 pm to Easternrio
Diez medicion de los pies alto.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 2:49 pm to joshnorris14
A western union tariff on wire transfers to Mexico would be a start.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:01 pm to joshnorris14
I don't see why we can't tax remittances at 50%.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:18 pm to bencoleman
Too high and they start finding alternatives where we get $0 of it.
The idea is to bleed them to get a cut of what they're sending, not kill Western Union.
The idea is to bleed them to get a cut of what they're sending, not kill Western Union.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:23 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Mexico will walk from negotiations
What Mexico doesn't understand yet is that these aren't negotiations. There will be no negotiating going on. Trump is going to tell them how its going to be, and they are going to say "si senor".
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:27 pm to joshnorris14
What "negotiations" is their presence critical to? I don't think Trump needs Mexico to implement his Policy.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:37 pm to joshnorris14
It's CNN, so it's probably alternative facts.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:38 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
There are other places with beaches to go.
Get the American tourist areas on board with 20% discounts and shite.
#MakeDaytonaBeachGreatAgain
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:42 pm to bencoleman
quote:
I don't see why we can't tax remittances at 50%.
Because you actually want revenue. Tax at 50% and they'll figure out other ways. Hell, you could have multiple friends pool their funds together and have someone who is here legally just buy a plane ticket and take a suitcase full of cash back. You can't make the tax so high that they resort to other means.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:44 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
How about a massive tax on all cruise ship passengers on ships headed to Mexico? On plane tickets to Mexico? Bring their tourism industry to a fricking halt. American tourists may not like it, but so what? There are other places with beaches to go. It might hurt cruise departures from New Orleans, but just go to Belize and La Ceiba instead.
Illegals send billions home every year by Western Union.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:46 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Hell, you could have multiple friends pool their funds together and have someone who is here legally just buy a plane ticket and take a suitcase full of cash back
TSA really has no legal means to seize the money but I wouldn't trust Mexican officials on the other end of the flight not to take you into the back room with a suitcase full of cash.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:49 pm to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
Hell, you could have multiple friends pool their funds together and have someone who is here legally just buy a plane ticket and take a suitcase full of cash back
TSA really has no legal means to seize the money but I wouldn't trust Mexican officials on the other end of the flight not to take you into the back room with a suitcase full of cash.
Gotta factor in a little kickback into your budget.
Seriously though, just take it back in travelers checks. You pay cash for them at the American Express office. No way for the US government to touch it.
The people we are talking about are neither stupid nor lazy. You cannot make the tax so high that they find alternatives. Tax the wire transfers at 10-12% and they won't bother.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 3:57 pm to BamaGradinTn
Actually, at that point, you don't even need a plane ticket. Walk into an Amex office and pay cash for $10,000 in travelers checks. Then go to FedEx and ship them.
How would the US government tax that?
How would the US government tax that?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:12 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Actually, at that point, you don't even need a plane ticket. Walk into an Amex office and pay cash for $10,000 in travelers checks. Then go to FedEx and ship them.
How would the US government tax that?
the same way they killed online poker: make it illegal for US banks and CC to participate in these schemes
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the same way they killed online poker: make it illegal for US banks and CC to participate in these schemes
I know that for some of you youngsters, travelers checks are relics from the era of cassette tape players, but do you even understand how they are bought and how they work? Have you ever used one?
Kindly explain how Uncle Sam would ever know who you wrote the check to or where it ended up.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:43 pm to joshnorris14
WTF is this with Mexico thinking that they can frick with us?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:51 pm to Scoob
Exactly the kind of shut that would havve made Obozo flinch and draw a red line.
It's comical how simple this stuff really is when it's not held up by politicians trying to posture the friends to make millions!
It's comical how simple this stuff really is when it's not held up by politicians trying to posture the friends to make millions!
Posted on 1/25/17 at 5:00 pm to joshnorris14
Of course none of you are offering any way that you can differentiate between legal immigrants or illegal immigrants. All you are proposing is taking money from people who live in the United States who wire that money to destinations in Mexico. Let me explain why this is likely a constitutional problem.
1. you are treating people differently under the law because they seek to wire money to a destination in Mexico. People wiring money to Canada or Iceland do not have a portion of their money seized. This may be a denial of equal protection of the law.
2. you are setting up a tax structure which does not apply to all Americans equally.
3. you are seizing money to force a certain class of Americans, those who seek to wire money to destinations in Mexico, to pay for a vanity wall so Trump will look like a tough guy. That isn't a valid government purpose to seize the money of one class of Americans.
1. you are treating people differently under the law because they seek to wire money to a destination in Mexico. People wiring money to Canada or Iceland do not have a portion of their money seized. This may be a denial of equal protection of the law.
2. you are setting up a tax structure which does not apply to all Americans equally.
3. you are seizing money to force a certain class of Americans, those who seek to wire money to destinations in Mexico, to pay for a vanity wall so Trump will look like a tough guy. That isn't a valid government purpose to seize the money of one class of Americans.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 5:02 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Mexico will walk from negotiations
So long as they walk south ... I'll allow it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News