Started By
Message

re: CNN Breaking News: AG Jeff Sessions Failed to disclose Russian contacts

Posted on 5/25/17 at 6:54 am to
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Wow, lots of conjecture and zero context. Reminds me of the Clinton death list. But you can't see that, can you?


Some conjecture, yes, but the attempts to undermine investigation are hitting legit obstruction level. The Clinton death list has zero substance. Not a great comparison.
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 7:11 am to
quote:

skiptumahloo


Your post are so bad.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 7:14 am to
That only exists in your mind.
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
10364 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 7:27 am to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147360 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 7:46 am to
Manafort is the new regurgitated muh Russians.

The latest is he called Reince back when and told him it was all BS...

IS CNN covering the unprecedented Obama admin spying on everybody?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21938 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Not once reporting on Obama spying on everybody and how serious it was;


Because he wasn't, and it wasn't.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Manafort is the new regurgitated muh Russians.


Solid sentence.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:17 am to
Legit obstruction? Ok. I'm game...let's see if you have any knowledge to back this up or if you just regurgitate what you hear. Which Federal Code, specifically do you think Trump is "legit" approaching violating? What are its elements, what are Trump's specific actions that meet those elements? Are there defenses to the Code you cite? What are they and who can utilize them?

I look forward to your insight.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:21 am to
There are so many leads that it could take eons.

Undermining sessions reminds me of all the holder tripe on td back in the day.

I am counting on monafort plea bargaining. I have had my money on him from the get go. Flynn now in contention, already asking for immunity.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:24 am to
This is exactly what tyrants do, create Byzantine regulations, laws, etc, and the apply them selectively

Holder was a fricking racist piece of shite
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Legit obstruction? Ok. I'm game...let's see if you have any knowledge to back this up or if you just regurgitate what you hear. Which Federal Code, specifically do you think Trump is "legit" approaching violating? What are its elements, what are Trump's specific actions that meet those elements? Are there defenses to the Code you cite? What are they and who can utilize them?

I look forward to your insight.


STFU. There is direct evidence of Trump telling DNI and NSA directors to.....
obstruction 1

“I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals,” Mr. Brennan told lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee.

Before Trump fired Comey, a likely conclusion of the Russia affair was coming into view. Flynn would be in trouble for his connections to Turkey and possible violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Former Trump campaign head Paul Manafort would be in trouble for some sort of shady business dealings in Ukraine. Maybe another figure or two from TrumpWorld would get into trouble, as well, but in ways tangential to the investigation. There would be scalps for Democrats to celebrate, but the most consequential issue -- collusion -- would end in nothing.

All that could still happen. But now, after the Comey sacking, the investigation has taken what is for Trump a more ominous turn. Focusing on alleged obstruction, the president's enemies no longer have to find an underlying crime on his part to attempt to remove him from office.

All the while, some Republicans have found themselves asking over and over: But what about collusion? Remember that? If there's no crime at the bottom of the Russia affair, then isn't this just much ado about nothing?

"The answer is no. Certainly, Trump has good arguments to make in his defense, beginning with what legally constitutes obstruction. But after the last two weeks, his supporters can no longer assume that his detractors will have to find an underlying crime to make big trouble for the president."

Washington Examiner conservative news.

Asked Comey if he could count on him...etc.

There is plenty for obstruction and it keeps getting worse.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22506 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:43 am to
quote:

I had to turn it off.
With CNN and the rest of the MSM, this is best practice. Always.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:59 am to
quote:

CNN Breaking News: AG Jeff Sessions Failed to disclose Russian contacts


What's wrong with AG Jeff Sessions failing to disclose he had contact lenses that he bought from Russians?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147360 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

STFU. There is direct evidence of Trump telling DNI and NSA directors to.....
obstruction 1

“I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals,” Mr. Brennan told lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee.

Before Trump fired Comey, a likely conclusion of the Russia affair was coming into view. Flynn would be in trouble for his connections to Turkey and possible violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Former Trump campaign head Paul Manafort would be in trouble for some sort of shady business dealings in Ukraine. Maybe another figure or two from TrumpWorld would get into trouble, as well, but in ways tangential to the investigation. There would be scalps for Democrats to celebrate, but the most consequential issue -- collusion -- would end in nothing.

All that could still happen. But now, after the Comey sacking, the investigation has taken what is for Trump a more ominous turn. Focusing on alleged obstruction, the president's enemies no longer have to find an underlying crime on his part to attempt to remove him from office.

All the while, some Republicans have found themselves asking over and over: But what about collusion? Remember that? If there's no crime at the bottom of the Russia affair, then isn't this just much ado about nothing?

"The answer is no. Certainly, Trump has good arguments to make in his defense, beginning with what legally constitutes obstruction. But after the last two weeks, his supporters can no longer assume that his detractors will have to find an underlying crime to make big trouble for the president."

Washington Examiner conservative news.

Asked Comey if he could count on him...etc.

There is plenty for obstruction and it keeps getting worse.
Wrong.

Reince was told by A DOJ official that muh Russians was BS. Even the hyper-partisan Clapper and Brennan say there is nothing there.

So if you were hounded in the MSM 24/7 with outright politcal lies made to look legal eagle, wouldn't you ask for a statement to make it stop? We are now into sabotoge of a sitting President that committed no crimes that even liberal attorney's have concluded.

Alan Dershowitz Says Special Counsel Will 'Find No Crime' Youtube Video

Alan Dershowitz "The leeker to the Washington Post is a Felon, Criminal and should go to Jail" - YouTube Video

At the worst POTUS Trump broke protocol while the former POTUS Obama has his name (Via AG Lynch,Susan Rice et al...) involved in so many felonies...

I don't care if you carry a "D" or an "R" after your name, in the words of Biden, this is a BFD.

Barack Obama's team secretly disclosed years of illegal NSA searches spying on Americans

And if the sycophants in DC don't address this; they will cease to exist as trustworthy by any means.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:


Because he wasn't, and it wasn't.



You are a blatant and serial liar. It's pathetic you can't accept that your boi was a fraud on a Hall of Fame level.

So the inspector general that said he was spying is lying?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69205 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:09 am to
I love that now we can call news we don't like "fake" and ignore it.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69205 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

We are now into sabotoge of a sitting President that committed no crimes that even liberal attorney's have concluded. 


Like when Bill Clinton got head and Republicans wanted him out over lying about it?
Come on.

There is news here, something is fishy.
Posted by ErikGordan
Member since Oct 2016
866 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:27 am to
The article was obviously fake. The lawyer's statement that he advised a member of Congress about a security clearance makes zero sense.
An elected representative does not need a security clearance. Staff are required to have required.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124188 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Trumpkins do not want to hear about this. Turn it off
Yep.
The next breaking news from CNN will announce Sessions' recusal from the Russians probe.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:


Except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing...
and the Tillerson thing
and the Sessions thing
and the Kushner thing
and the Carter Page thing
and the Roger Stone thing
and the Felix Sater thing
and the Boris Ephsteyn thing
and the Rosneft thing
and the Gazprom thing
and the Sergey Gorkov banker thing
and the Azerbajain thing
and the “I love Putin” thing
and the Donald Trump, Jr. thing
and the Sergey Kislyak thing
and the Russian Affiliated Interests thing
and the Russian Business Interests thing
and the Emoluments Clause thing
and the Alex Schnaider thing
and the hack of the DNC thing
and the Guccifer 2.0 thing
and the Mike Pence “I don’t know anything” thing
and the Russians mysteriously dying thing
and Trump’s public request to Russia to hack Hillary’s email thing
and the Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king thing
and the Russian fertilizer king’s plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign thing
and the Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night thing
and the Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery thing
and the Cyprus bank thing
and Trump not releasing his tax returns thing
and the Republican Party’s rejection of an amendment to require Trump to show his taxes thing
and the election hacking thing
and the GOP platform change to the Ukraine thing
and the Steele Dossier thing
and the Leninist Bannon thing
and the Sally Yates can’t testify thing
and the intelligence community’s investigative reports thing
and the Trump reassurance that the Russian connection is all “fake news” thing
and the Spicer’s Russian Dressing “nothing’s wrong” thing
and the Chaffetz not willing to start an investigation thing
and the Chaffetz suddenly deciding to go back to private life in the middle of an investigation thing
and the The Lead DOJ Investigator Mary McCord SUDDENLY in the middle of the investigation decides to resign thing
and the appointment of Pam Bondi who was bribed by trump in the trump university scandal appointed to head the investigation thing
and the The White House going into full-on cover-up mode, refusing to turn over the documents related to the hiring and subsequent firing of Flynn thing
and the Chaffetz and White House blaming the poor vetting of Flynn on Obama thing
and the Poland and British intelligence gave information regarding the hacking back in 2015 to Paul Ryan and he didn't do anything thing
and the Agent M16 following the money thing
And now the trump team KNEW about Flynn's involvement but hired him anyway thing
and The Corey Lewendowski thing
and the Preet Bharara firing thing but before he left he transferred evidence against trump to a state level Schneiderman thing
And the Betsy Devos' Brother thing
And the Sebastian Gorka thing
And the Greg Gianforte from Montana thing
And the pence actually was warned about Flynn before he was hired thing
and the Pence and Manafort connection thing
And the 7 Allies coming forward with audio where trump was picked up in incidental wire tapping thing
and the carter Page defying the Senate's order to hand over his Russian contact list
AND NOW the trump wants to VETO Sally Yates' testimony thing!!!
SO yeah there’s probably nothing there!

[credit to some random poster on NPR]


This sore loser lefty talking point was already posted in another thread and discredited by me.

That is just a pile of bullshite circumstantial evidence that doesn't proves anything.

Provide an iota of actual evidence that proves President Trump or any person in his administration colluded with the Russians.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram