- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN - Elizabeth Warren in 2016? Republicans take notice
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:17 am to Wolfhound45
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:17 am to Wolfhound45
She's to the left of Obama, no way she makes it.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:17 am to The Spleen
quote:
I like Warren as she seems to be one of the few in Congress that is genuinely concerned for the average citizen
Well, it's pretty easy to play populist if you have no sense of shame or personal integrity. I guess that's what it takes. Just tell everyone what they want to hear.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:19 am to DelU249
I sure as hell wouldn't vote for her.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:19 am to The Spleen
quote:
I like Warren as she seems to be one of the few in Congress that is genuinely concerned for the average citizen
So you're really, really, really stupid/gullible?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:20 am to TT9
quote:
I sure as hell wouldn't vote for her.
Oh, so now you're a racist!!! She's 1/64 Native American!
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:23 am to The Spleen
quote:
I like Warren as she seems to be one of the few in Congress that is genuinely concerned for the average citizen
She's an academic; she doesn't know anything about the average citizen.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:23 am to TT9
Academics are so radical, that would fricking scare me
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:26 am to DelU249
quote:
yeah dems aren't serious about running her, they want it to appear as if hildawg isn't ascending a throne.
So here's the play.
Dems run the two women (Hills and Pochanates) plus a few token guys. The old boys bow out early and say it's time for the nation to move forward and elect a woman. They'll cite the fact that we're years behind the UK, Germany, Brazil, India, etc.
GOP runs its slate, and they're smart enough to play it cool. But some boneheaded House candidate who has a microphone in his face for the first time says something retarded.
Media pounces, war on wimmenz, birth control denied by old whitey, all wimmenz menstrual cycles in the US sync-up and they go absolutely batshit on 08 November 2016. Wimmenz flood the polls, men take shelter, Hillary destroys Rand/Christie/Bush.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:27 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
So you're really, really, really stupid/gullible?
Why would you say that? I don't agree with her on a few things, but I like her stance on big banks and the student loan industry.
I wouldn't vote for her for president in 2016 though.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:27 am to TT9
quote:
She's to the left of Obama, no way she makes it.
They seem the same to me, what issues is she to the left of Obama on?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:28 am to gatorrocks
I hope she runs because her and Hillary would destroy each other in primary debates.
It would split the women vote and cause neither to get the nomination IMO
I would imagine the DNC, if they're smart, are telling her to not run
It would split the women vote and cause neither to get the nomination IMO
I would imagine the DNC, if they're smart, are telling her to not run
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:34 am to constant cough
Taxes for one, didn't she say she wants to tax million and billionaires 60 to 70%?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:35 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
My friend, the article is from CNN. I have a feeling that there are many on the Left that want to see her run. Many. She is (somewhat) the anti-Hillary in their mind's eye. And as a Conservative, I am hoping she does so we can offset the abysmal job we have done as late of getting someone elected for President.
She is being pushed hard by the far left of the D party. They are the one's orchestrating this. They didn't like Hillary in 08. They don't like her now-she's far too moderate for them.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:37 am to Navytiger74
quote:
So here's the play.
Dems run the two women (Hills and Pochanates) plus a few token guys. The old boys bow out early and say it's time for the nation to move forward and elect a woman. They'll cite the fact that we're years behind the UK, Germany, Brazil, India, etc.
GOP runs its slate, and they're smart enough to play it cool. But some boneheaded House candidate who has a microphone in his face for the first time says something retarded.
Media pounces, war on wimmenz, birth control denied by old whitey, all wimmenz menstrual cycles in the US sync-up and they go absolutely batshit on 08 November 2016. Wimmenz flood the polls, men take shelter, Hillary destroys Rand/Christie/Bush.
So in other words- very similar to the last two elections.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:37 am to TigerFanatic99
While Warren and I do not agree on many fiscal or social issues, I do support her anti-establishment attitude and wish there were more like here.
Her running for president is laughable though.
Her running for president is laughable though.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:38 am to constant cough
quote:
They seem the same to me, what issues is she to the left of Obama on?
war, drug legalization and most importantly BANKS.
I would be intrigued by a warren candidacy, I am not sure she has the experience or the qualification to be president but holy frick does she hate big banks. And I hate them too.
No way she gets nominated though, too egg head.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 11:38 am to The Spleen
quote:
I like Warren as she seems to be one of the few in Congress that is genuinely concerned for the average citizen. But I don't think she's ready to be president.
I like her too Spleen, but she isn't ready.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News