- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
,
Posted on 7/2/17 at 11:58 pm
Posted on 7/2/17 at 11:58 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/4/20 at 8:37 am
19
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:01 am to Rhino67
Not clicking, not reading, enjoy your downvote.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:01 am to Rhino67
A 40 year study?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:02 am to Rhino67
website seems sketchy and the way the article presents itself is unprofessional.
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 12:03 am
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:02 am to ehidal1
quote:
satellite data correction
Had to change the numbers to support your theory. That sounds about right.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:02 am to Rhino67
The Earth is melting right now? 
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:03 am to Rhino67
quote:i have no idea about the validity of the information, but when i see a title like this i instantly go into a "dont believe" mindset
Climate change sceptics suffer blow
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:06 am to Rhino67
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:08 am to Rhino67
So a company who has gotten massive funding from NOAA has came up with a new "adjustment" to add. At the rate these new "adjustments" and "corrections" are coming out the ocean could boil by Thanksgiving
Good stuff
Good stuff
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 12:21 am
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:12 am to Rhino67
So basically another correction to the satellite data that was on file, which had corrected the temps that had been documented in US newspapers for over 100 years . . . . because the first satellite correction left too many gaps in the theory
Gotcha
Gotcha
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:12 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
website seems sketchy and the way the article presents itself is unprofessional.
Compared to what? Certainly not most sources presented here.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:14 am to Rhino67
I've little doubt the climate is changing.
But what in that study points to anthropogenic causes?
But what in that study points to anthropogenic causes?
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 12:18 am
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:14 am to Rhino67
Still bullshite. How many humans were on earth when the last ice age ended? Nature. Science.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:16 am to Rhino67
Oh, the climate is changing? I can buy that.
What do you want me to do about it?
What do you want me to do about it?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:27 am to Rhino67
Oh wait, it gets even better. Your 'researcher' is on the Board of Directors for BERKELEY Earth. No bias there, huh?
No. I take it back, they admit to completely being biased
quote:
We plan further scientific investigations on the nature of climate change, a major education and communications program to strengthen the scientific consensus on global warming, and work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the places that will be the worst emitters over the next 30 years.
No. I take it back, they admit to completely being biased
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:31 am to Rhino67
Fake news AND fake science. frick you.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:35 am to Rhino67
Oh noz. They will label me a climate denier. And a racist, sexist, homophobe, islamaphobe, xenophobe, etc. I'm sure this will be the time we all change our deplorable minds and believe in man made climate change without any real proof.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 12:46 am to Maytheporkbewithyou
quote:LINK
They will label me a climate denier
quote:
Micha Tomkiewicz, a professor at Brooklyn College determined not to "let the deniers win again," equated opponents of global warming policies with supporters wrote on Earth Day 2012. "But what about climate change deniers? Can we really compare the two, the Holocaust and climate change?"
"We are now painfully aware that the Holocaust deniers were dead wrong and that there was a planned systematic genocide," Tomkiewicz, author of Climate Change: The End of Now, wrote on Earth Day 2012. "But what about climate change deniers? Can we really compare the two, the Holocaust and climate change?"
Answer: Yes, he argues. "Despite the fact that Hitler published the first volume of his manifesto, Mein Kampf, in 1925, where he laid out his philosophy, he was, nevertheless, democratically elected as German Chancellor in 1933," Tomkiewicz explained. "Few people believed in 1933 that he would seriously try to accomplish what he preached or anticipated the consequences that resulted from his actions."
He believes that the evidence for climate change is as obvious as the evidence that Hitler planned genocide and war. "Although there was evidence available – Hitler was clear about what he wanted to do in Mein Kampf – why did people not pay attention?" he asks, rhetorically. "These 'deniers' might as well have been called skeptics in their day."
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:04 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Go to the actual article, chief. Two words for you - peer reviewed.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:05 am to LSUconvert
There are no legitimate sources presented here to support your position.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News