Started By
Message

re: Chris Matthews: Democrats' Dilemma If Rand Faces Hillary In 2016

Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:02 pm to
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Hillary will not be the nominee.

Warren is going to come out of nowhere like Obama did in 2008.


And then watch herself lose to Rand in a gigantic and astronomical landslide with the slim possibility of it rivaling Reagan's 84' election victory.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

deltaland


quote:

WeeWee


quote:

Bible thumpers


Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:03 pm to
I'm not so sure about that. Rand won't be able to get to the left of Warren like he can with Hillary.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9415 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

That would be awesome. Really hope this happens


She doesn't have the intangibles that Obama had, but that might not matter if the GOP continues to screw the pooch in selecting viable candidates. Rand would be the best option, but I think he goes down in primary season like Hilary.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

I'm not so sure about that. Rand won't be able to get to the left of Warren like he can with Hillary.


Who would want to get to the left of Warren? You couldn't fit a piece of paper between her and Marx.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

I'm not so sure about that. Rand won't be able to get to the left of Warren like he can with Hillary.


Doubt that the country is looking for someone to the Left of Senator Warren (if that candidate can even be found).

ETA: the808bass
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 11:08 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55439 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

Rand won't be able to get to the left of Warren like he can with Hillary.


Maybe not on certain social issues, but what about foreign policy? I don't know much about Warren in that respect.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84835 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

quote:

Warren is going to come out of nowhere like Obama did in 2008.


We can only hope


yeah how did that work out for republicans?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84835 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:28 pm to
quote:


Who would want to get to the left of Warren? You couldn't fit a piece of paper between her and Marx.



you have to win more than just the deep south and Texas to become POTUS
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

you have to win more than just the deep south and Texas to become POTUS

And you have to win more than the Northeast. Warren would have a tough time winning Minnesota. Or Ohio. I know the racial President experiment turned out so well that some of y'all think you can replicate it with a woman President experiment. Warren is no Obama. She can't evoke or invoke the way he did before he quit his job. But I recommend y'all run her to make sure.
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 11:32 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84835 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:34 pm to
If she ran i think she would be very dangerous but i doubt she does so it doesn't really matter
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

If she ran i think she would be very dangerous but i doubt she does so it doesn't really matter

She's dangerous like Michelle Bachmann was dangerous. They're both fringe candidates who get a certain segment of the base excited and have extremely limited appeal outside of that segment.
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:40 pm to
True believer in what for Hillary? She is far far far from a true believer.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/25/14 at 11:45 pm to
No, Warren.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84835 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:03 am to
quote:

She's dangerous like Michelle Bachmann was dangerous. They're both fringe candidates who get a certain segment of the base excited and have extremely limited appeal outside of that segment.


This shows just how out of touch you are with most of America but again she probably won't run so it's a pointless debate
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:08 am to
quote:


This shows just how out of touch you are with most of America


This shows how far you are out of touch. She would get destroyed. A very small percentage of Americans are as liberal as her.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:10 am to
No, it doesn't.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69258 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:10 am to
DS, get real. Do you really think Warren appeals to the American people? She excites New England tenured professors, and that is about it.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55439 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:10 am to
Who would win in a Santorum v Warren race?

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 12:12 am to
quote:

Who would win in a Santorum v Warren race?


Not the American public. What a nightmare.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram