.

Clapper already has lied before Congress, so I suspect more of the same from him. Comey is floundering from week to week, and some suspect he has lied publicly already. Rodgers got thrown under the bus by the Obama admin. Brennan is an Obama croney. Yates was fired by Trump. Crowdstrike is suspect because of well documented lack of ethics of certain infosec companies. Granted, Crowdstrike does have a pretty good rep, but questions remain on if they fearmongered just to get the DNC to purchase their endpoint software. This ought to be a very interesting hearing.

Are you denying that Clapper outright lied to Congress?

A lot of really interesting information, but one line stuck out. IF Trump was under investigation it should have reached the gang of 8 and it did not. So, either he was never under investigation or something shady was going on. Another interesting note is that they called in Crowdstrike to testify. He also refers to the "alleged" Russian hacking. My take...
They already know the answers.

c-span video

quote:

---

Flynn resigned from his post last month after it was revealed that he discussed sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the month before Trump took office.

---

quote:

---

I wouldnt expect anything new or mindblowing in a public hearing.

---

Likely not. These hearings more often than not are for political theater and nothing more. Something not everyone may know is that those being interviewed are often given most of the questions ahead of time.

Nothing will come of this. They will not incriminate themselves.. so even if they did something illegal nobody will know about it.

The frick is Yates doing alongside those?

quote:

---

I expect some here will experience discomfort when the CrowdStrike guys testify.

---

I'm looking forward to their explanation as to why they destroyed the "evidence" of Russian hacking before the FBI could examine it.

In