Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Breaking: Federal judge declines to end WI recount

Posted on 12/9/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146759 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 12:54 pm
quote:

LINK

Today, U.S. District Court Judge James D. Peterson denied an injunction sought by Great America PAC, The Committee to Defend the President (formerly known as Stop Hillary PAC) and Ronald R. Johnson to end Green Party US candidate Jill Stein’s pointless recount in Wisconsin. In doing so, however, Judge Peterson interpreted the law to clearly prevent the inevitable frivolous appeal of the recount by Stein from disrupting the safe harbor for Wisconsin’s electoral votes for President Elect Donald Trump. Eric Beach, Co-Chairman of Great America PAC, stated, “Hopefully Miss Stein’s sham fundraising will end, and we can get about the business of making America great again,” Beach continued, “Stein has shown no compunction about endangering other’s right to vote and be counted to server her own financial benefit, and while the recount will continue, Stein will not be able to further endanger Wisconsin voters.”

quote:

James Peterson
Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Incumbent
Assumed office
May 12, 2014
Appointed by Barack Obama
Preceded by John Shabaz
Personal details
Born August 18, 1957 (age 59)
Lake Charles, Louisiana, U.S.
Alma mater University of Wisconsin–Madison

Obama appointed a lot of judges. What a political shitshow we have become.
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 12:59 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 12:59 pm to
It's already 90% recounted anyway, so nbd.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146759 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:00 pm to
Okay good, thanks. I wasn't sure. What is the latest tally?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Appointed by Barack Obama

Here's everything you need to know
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146759 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:34 pm to
Yep. Obama appointed him a crap ton of judges.

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79111 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

It's already 90% recounted anyway, so nbd.


Somewhat reassuring. When are they supposed to be finished?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51610 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Okay good, thanks. I wasn't sure. What is the latest tally?



As of Dec 6th (no newer numbers available) the results are:

Trump has gained a net of 139 votes
Clinton has gained a net of 141 votes

At this point Hillary has a net gain of 2 votes which is a joke (and a monumental waste of money) compared to the 22,000 she lost by.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:42 pm to
Net change of 3 votes in favor of trump
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:44 pm to
once wisconsin finishes the rest of this silliness should end. I hope Trump has sessions rape the clinton foundation over this shite.
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4043 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:04 pm to
So, you're saying that you want the Executive branch to order an investigation of an opponent for political reasons?
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 2:05 pm
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

So, you're saying that you want the Executive branch to order an investigation of an opponent for political reasons?
Posted by Kjun Tiger
Member since Dec 2014
2147 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

At this point Hillary has a net gain of 2 votes


quote:

Net change of 3 votes in favor of trump


Dammit, now we need another recount!
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13538 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

So, you're saying that you want the Executive branch to order an investigation of an opponent for political reasons?




No that would just be an added benefit.

The Clinton Foundation should be investigated because it appears to be shady as hell. As a non profit, if any funds were incorrectly used there are serious ramifications.

We are a nation of laws, and there should be Hell to pay when laws are broken. By either side. If people dont like the law, then change it.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146759 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:12 pm to
The DOJ, IRS and FBI are a tentacle of Obama's extreme politics. Deny this. Go research IG Gerald Walpin. An IG Obama fired because an investigation came back derogatory on MO and Americorps.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

So, you're saying that you want the Executive branch to order an investigation of an opponent for political reasons?




Investigation is an ambiguous word. How about we just rip their throats out Mr. president.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram