Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Atlanta's 'Cityhood' Movement & Jason Lary's Fight to Incorporate Stonecrest

Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:45 am
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:45 am
There was an article, " Atlanta's Controversial 'Cityhood' Movement" by Sam Rosen that was published by The Atlantic on Thursday that focused on Jason Lary's fight to incorporate Stonecrest, Georgia, last November.

The article also discussed the local political battles for city incorporation on the outskirts of Atlanta, and how it's part of a larger movement or phenomenon, attracting serious interest even as far away as Japan.

At over 6200 words, it's a lengthy article for sure, and it goes into the usual liberal spiel about the worrying racial overtones based on past history, but the author mostly gets out the way and lets the protagonists tell their side of the story in their own words, which led to some really great quotes:

quote:

But Lary, his supporters, and his opponents—the folks ripping up his campaign signs—are not the white people at the center of the cityhood movement. Rather, they are a black community: If Lary were to succeed, Stonecrest would become the 15th-largest city in Georgia and the first majority-black city created by its own residents since Reconstruction. Many of Lary’s neighbors and friends couldn’t believe that he was aligning the area with cityhood and employing the strategies of the very people whose political tactics had weakened local black communities for more than a decade. Worse, not only had Lary aligned with the cityhood movement; he had enlisted its most famous advocate.



Jason Lary


quote:

The cityhood movement was a major milestone for the politics of “suburban secession,” according to Kruse. These communities wanted “to get away from metropolitan Atlanta, both in terms of their identity, but largely in terms of having political, economic, or legal obligations to the city of Atlanta, its people, and what were regarded as its problems,” Kruse told me. “They wanted to be separate. And once that benchmark was laid down, that model was something that other suburban communities could easily look to.”


quote:

Jason Lary counts himself firmly among the dissatisfied. As I accompanied Lary on his campaign stops, he told the story of his DeKalb County neighborhood, an area that, while middle-class, had been hit hard by the recession and hadn’t recovered. “You see these houses out here?” he asked me as we drove around the Stonecrest footprint, checking on his signs. “In north DeKalb, these would be $300,000, $400,000 houses. Here? $150,000, $165,000. They were built new at $400,000, and when [the market] crashed, they never came back. And this is the heart of Stonecrest—your average homeowner.”

The area has a large upscale shopping mall, includes the Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area, and sits just a few exits from downtown Atlanta, and yet Stonecrest hasn’t drawn much interest from businesses or developers. “I’ve tested this before,” Lary said. “As an insurance executive, I call on nothing but CEOs and vice presidents. And I will talk about having a location in DeKalb County—they just snicker and laugh ... They won’t even stop on our exit to take a look at us, because of the DeKalb County government.”


quote:

I HAVE BEEN INVESTING in this town for 25, 30 years,” Lary told me. “We thought that the county would have done better for us, and it didn’t happen.” But then he noticed “cities starting to form on their own.” When Lary caught wind of these incorporation campaigns, he saw the cityhood movement’s potential to transform his own community. When a neighborhood called La Vista Hills tried to become a city, Lary started dropping in on their meetings: “Not only am I the only black guy there—I’m the only black guy there in a suit!” But Lary quickly befriended the La Vista Hills leadership, “and from there,” he said, “I watched and learned.”


quote:

Lary, though, is comfortable with confrontation. “You cannot be a cotton ball for the kind of work I’m doing,” he told me. “It’s some Jimmy Hoffa-level work.” As he embarked on his war for Stonecrest, the hostility he faced from his friends and neighbors was countered by an unexpected source: a wave of conservative white support from across metro Atlanta. ...

...


NO SUPPORT, HOWEVER, would be as crucial as that of a man named Oliver Porter. Lary is built like a linebacker and speaks in a theatrical baritone, but when he describes his first encounter with Porter, his voice lowers to an awed hush: “In the third [La Vista Hills] meeting, the master shows up: Oliver Porter.” After the meeting, Lary chased him down in the parking lot. “He thought I was trying to rob him!” Lary cackled. “And from that point on, I didn’t let him out of my sight.”



An Oliver Porter meme.


quote:

When Sandy Springs became the first city to incorporate, other communities flocked to Porter for guidance. His written instructions to fellow cityhood enthusiasts grew to manuscript length, and so he published them; then he wrote a second book a few years later. As the cityhood movement grew, Porter became known as the guru of lean, effective local government. The first time we spoke, he had just returned from giving a series of lectures in Hawaii. He has worked with municipalities in Honduras and across the United States; recently, his book became a best-seller in its genre (“Government”) in Japan.


quote:

Given Porter’s obsession with government efficiency and his disdain for politics, he embodies precisely what the cityhood movement has long claimed to be about.


quote:

Porter, however, is passionately insistent that race had nothing to do with Sandy Springs’ zoning concerns. “I can tell you personally, from having sat on the organizing committee for 10 years, that race was never an issue,” he told me. The only time race was discussed, Porter said, was when the committee brainstormed methods of minority outreach as it planned the new city.


quote:

While Lary and Porter are unwavering in their advocacy for the cityhood movement, they both acknowledge that achieving their goals means leaving behind a group of increasingly disadvantaged neighbors. When I asked Porter about this, he jumped in before I could finish the question. “So the issue is: People say, Well, it isn’t fair to the rest of the people who got left behind,” he said. “My answer to them has been: Form your own city. If you want to get good government, form your own city. Don’t just keep depending on someone else to subsidize you.”

This position is key to Porter’s argument. People in unincorporated areas may be worse off as a result of the cityhood movement, but the county is still exploiting them—and all they have to do to mitigate the damage from the incorporations around them is to incorporate themselves.

“What bothers me is, out there, all of these existing governments operating so inefficiently,” Porter said, practically seething. “And I’ve studied them, and I know they could be doing it much more efficiently for their citizens and providing them better service at the same time … And yet, you cannot get elected officials to do it, because they basically are more concerned about their own jobs than they are the citizens.”

Lary was more blunt: “Hey, go get your own. Do it for yourself.”
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31507 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:50 am to
Will read. When I moved in my house, I found a flyer from the 1940s calling for neighbors to attend a meeting to block annexation in to Atlanta. Still resisting in 2017.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18314 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:51 am to
The libertarian view is that smaller is better. In a perfect world we would have a million countries.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:06 pm to
It's the most abstract, general issue in the theory of politics and government, and ultimately, it's a question of scope. There will always be some political authority over smaller self-governing localities, but how do you limit the larger body's scope of authority?

If you look at federalism, how do you keep it from moving away from confederalism (general level of government is subordinate to the regional level), and toward a unitary state (regional level of government is subordinate to the general level)?

The ancient Israelites had a confederacy, but soon opted for a monarchy instead. The independent Greek city-states formed leagues to protect against Persia, but Athens grew in power. Russia agreed to honor a 1991 nuclear weapons agreement on sovereign borders with Ukraine, and then decided that Crimeans could vote themselves out. Some in Scotland want to leave the U.K., but the government in Spain doesn't want to allow them in the EU, because it would promote Basque separatism. Religious freedom exists in this country, and allows families to raise and educate their own children, but the state intervenes away. Same with Indian reservations.

From the family unit to the local municipality to the state to the sovereign country to the U.N., the world can't agree on what the proper scope of authority is.


In any case, that's all theorizing about how things ought to be. Luckily, the 'Cityhood' Movement seems to be fairly spontaneous and organic, and is propelled by economic factors (in favor of devolution) that can't easily be stopped in the current political system.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 12:12 pm
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:


The libertarian view is that smaller is better. In a perfect world we would have a million countries

And none of them would be libertarian.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18314 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:30 pm to
Yes, they would since the governments would be too weak to be a threat.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146946 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:37 pm to
.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 12:40 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67115 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:45 pm to
"Local control and self-determination is racist"_ major media
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:46 pm to
You're missing the point. Even a family unit is not libertarian. The only way you get closer to political libertarianism is by having a larger political entity to ensure individual rights against local tyrannies.

I'm not saying this as somebody opposed to the libertarian cause. I'm just saying that political liberty and freedom is maximized at some intersection between localized anarchy and top-down protected rights, and the hard part is getting the layers and scopes of those top-down rights correct.
Posted by MikeyFL
Las Vegas, NV
Member since Sep 2010
9597 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 12:51 pm to
That was a fascinating read. Thank you for sharing.
Posted by crazycubes
Member since Jan 2016
5256 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 6:58 pm to
Great article. Lary went and said if white people can tell the county to frick off and form their own city , so can black people. Good for them. No shocker that the dems in DeKalb County immediately called Lary an Uncle Tom. Dems know how to keep the blacks on the plantation.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

In a perfect world we would have a million countries.




Nothing wrong with that.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:44 pm to
Sandy Springs is a great community and by keeping all the services privatized they keep government to a minimum and the piles of money for politicians to grab small.

We need such a city in Louisiana. St. George should take their example.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram