- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - eta Final Study Released
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:54 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:54 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I find it odd how angry folks get over people trying to find the truth.
You're brainwashed. Facts don't matter...just like the "global warming" nutbags. Just my opinion..others may feel differently.....but, maybe I'm not understanding what your theory is?? What are you suggesting happened on 911? What were the operatives that caused it, and how did they do it?
1
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:55 pm to Dale51
" Pull it - then we watched the it collapse " means they pulled the firefighters ?You are special kind of stupid . 100's of times and every time you've been wrong - nice . Yea , instead of saying hey guys leave the building it might collapse he used " pull it" a known demolition term to say it . MMMmmm k 
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:59 pm to Dale51
quote:
You're brainwashed. Facts don't matter...
For the serious?
Literally engineering and science. If you were attacking the methods and assumptions then you wouldn't be so hypocritical.
I look forward to the day later in the year or early next year after this study is peer-reviewed.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:00 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
" pull it" a known demolition term to say it . LOL MMMmmm k
Again..you're brainwashed. The clip of Silverstien is 58 seconds...why? Could it be that the whole context was that of the firefighting operation?
Again...what is your belief of who conducted the 911 tragedy and how was it done?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:03 pm to ProbyOne
quote:
Literally engineering and science.
Yeah...like "global warming" is based on science and people with knowledge of atmospheric "engineering".
What are you suggesting happened on 911? Who were the operatives and how was it done?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:05 pm to Dale51
Are you saying that this study is invalid unless there is a motive determined first?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:07 pm to Dale51
I have no idea how it was done or who did it . I can't state anything as fact but I'm certainly smart enough to realize a shite ton of what were told is pure bullshite . You say Im brainwashed ? Really? lol Ive watched the entire interview of Shillverstein and many more and no matter what you tell me " pull it " a known demo term will never mean remove firefighters . Plane hit the pentagon - did the wreckage vaporize? Plane hit in PA - did the wreckage vaporize? I could on and on - stay in your bubble man
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:08 pm to ProbyOne
quote:
Are you saying that this study is invalid unless there is a motive determined first?
No. Thats not what I'm saying. Where did you get the idea that I was basing my views on "motive"? It seems you're trying to deflect. Can you answer my 2 questions?
Here's a third. Have you seen the movie by Dylan Avery called "Loose Change"?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:09 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
but I'm certainly smart enough to realize a shite ton of what were told is pure bull shite .
Like what? Be as specific as possible.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:12 pm to ProbyOne
So in order for the truther theories to be plausible, they'd need to have orchestrated the planes hitting right in the right spot, so that later, when the "planned demolition" was ignited, making the buildings collapse from the top down, it would "look legit".
How did the impact of the planes not trigger the explosives, which were placed in the floors where the planes hit?
Seriously you guys are fricktarded.
How did the impact of the planes not trigger the explosives, which were placed in the floors where the planes hit?
Seriously you guys are fricktarded.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:13 pm to Dale51
I gave you two already. If you can explain how the wreckage at two separate sites vaporized Ill give you more . Your struggling with the Term " Pull It" though . So , I'm not expecting much from you .
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:14 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
hich is why NIST was careful to say that the damage from buildings 1 and 2 was NOT the cause for the building falling as it did
I didn't say it was. I said the fires inside the building led to the collapse.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:18 pm to wmr
quote:
Seriously you guys are fricktarded.
I've learned my lesson talking to truthers a long time ago. They're impossible. No debris found at the Pentagon! Show them pics of plane parts all over the place... crickets. Every time their theories are debunked they just create new theories. Not worth the time discussing the topic with people who refuse to accept anything that the government says but will believe practically anything else.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:20 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
If you can explain how the wreckage at two separate sites vaporized Ill give you more .
What do you mean by "Vaporized"? There were many pieces of the plane retrieved from the Pentagon etc.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:23 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
They're impossible. No debris found at the Pentagon! Show them pics of plane parts all over the place... crickets.
Yeah...but..squibs, maaan...squibs!
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:42 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
I've learned my lesson talking to truthers a long time ago. They're impossible. No debris found at the Pentagon! Show them pics of plane parts all over the place... crickets. Every time their theories are debunked they just create new theories. Not worth the time discussing the topic with people who refuse to accept anything that the government says but will believe practically anything else.
Yep.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:45 pm to JoeHackett
I never said no pieces were found - I said for the most part the plane vaporized at the pentagon . You all cling to a wheel and part of a fuselage . Like that couldn't have been planted for the photo op. Then totaly ignore the PA crash where nothing was found at all . Zero , zilch no bodies no pieces no nothing .
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:46 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
1) Explosion removed the fire retardant insulation. 2) Intense heat caused weakening and embrittlement of the steal core. 3) Failure of steel core at points of impact caused excessive gravity load from the falling of that portion of the building above the point of impact. This is entirely feasible and totally consistent with what I watched with my own eyes. I've used ABAQUS, studied materials science and designed steel structures. I have not modelled this particular phenomenon. There are engineers who will model anything and theorize anything. I don't put much stock in to this study. I have seen many studies that are not worth the paper they are printed on. I have not read this study in detail.
You just wasted all that time talking about buildings 1and 2
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:48 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
In a 1988 Justice Department memo to the House Judiciary Committee, the Assistant Attorney General formally reviewed the recommendations of the HSCA report and reported a conclusion of active investigations.[3] In light of investigative reports from the FBI's Technical Services Division and the National Academy of Science Committee determining that "reliable acoustic data do not support a conclusion that there was a second gunman", the Justice Department concluded "that no persuasive evidence can be identified to support the theory of a conspiracy in … the assassination of President Kennedy".[
Hey moron, you linked a wiki article that totally refutes your claim. The acoustic evidence that the HSCA used was found to be erroneous. They didn't have the technology then to come to an accurate conclusion. Hence the word "probably". In'88 they did. Read "Reclaiming History" by Vincent Bugliosi.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 2:55 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
I said for the most part the plane vaporized at the pentagon . You all cling to a wheel and part of a fuselage .
So what is your theory? That said...you're moving the goal posts again. You did not state that "for the most part".
quote:
Then totaly ignore the PA crash where nothing was found at all . Zero , zilch no bodies no pieces no nothing .
You're brainwashed.
Page 3 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News