- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - eta Final Study Released
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:43 pm to MF Doom
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:43 pm to MF Doom
quote:
Now it's pretty widely accepted that he was killed by deep state / CIA / mil industrial complex.
Wait, what?
quote:LINK
The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was established in 1976 to investigate the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. The HSCA completed its investigation in 1978 and issued its final report the following year, concluding that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.
What part of this do you not understand?
2
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:45 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Where was WTC7 impacted, and by what?
WTC7 was impacted by hundreds (maybe thousands) of tons of burning debris from the collapsing North and South towers. The collapse of the towers caused massive structural damage to WTC7 and the burning debris sparked massive fires that were fueled by office materials. The collapsing of the towers also destroyed WTC7's sprinkler system, thus leaving the raging inferno within WTC7 unchecked for seven or eight straight hours. Fire weakens steel and causes it to expand. When left unchecked, the raging fires can lead to total collapse. There were no firefighters battling the fires in Building 7. So an unchecked fire raging through an already structurally compromised building would give you results we saw that afternoon.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:49 pm to Robin Masters
A study like this takes time and money. All funded by individuals... so no not surprising that this is coming out now.
Regardless this will be peer-reviewed as well.
Regardless this will be peer-reviewed as well.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:52 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Fire weakens steel and causes it to expand. When left unchecked, the raging fires can lead to total collapse. There were no firefighters battling the fires in Building 7. So an unchecked fire raging through an already structurally compromised building would give you results we saw that afternoon.
No shite dude.
Like I said, this is LITERALLY a structural engineering analysis. They cover all of this in the model.
NIST did as well, but they missed some key design elements of the building and built a shitty model.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:53 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Wrong.
So an unchecked fire raging through an already structurally compromised building would give you results we saw that afternoon.
The damage you described would have likely caused the building to topple on the side of the damage, which is why NIST was careful to say that the damage from buildings 1 and 2 was NOT the cause for the building falling as it did (practically into its own footprint, as in a controlled demolition).
Posted on 10/7/17 at 12:59 pm to ProbyOne
9/11 truthers are the strangest truthers.
I mean, I literally watched planes ram into those buildings on live TV. I saw humans leaping to their deaths from a 110 story building.
What the frick is wrong with you people?
I mean, I literally watched planes ram into those buildings on live TV. I saw humans leaping to their deaths from a 110 story building.
What the frick is wrong with you people?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:02 pm to wmr
I take this to mean you didn't read the premise of the study and preliminary findings?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:05 pm to wmr
quote:
I mean, I literally watched planes ram into those buildings on live TV. I saw humans leaping to their deaths from a 110 story building.
To be fair, most truthers aren't denying that part of it. They are questioning the details of how, who, and the why. Most of them go over the top, but I also feel like anyone that blindly trusts what our government says is a fool.
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:06 pm to wmr
quote:The ridiculous propaganda that the establishment put out was the strangest.
9/11 truthers are the strangest truthers.
I find it odd how angry folks get over people trying to find the truth.
quote:Everything you see on TV is real. Just remember that.
I mean, I literally watched planes ram into those buildings on live TV.
quote:Who has ever claimed that nobody died on that day? Name one. tia
I saw humans leaping to their deaths from a 110 story building.
quote:Right? Anyone who would mistrust the fake news and a loving establishment must have mental problems.
What the frick is wrong with you people?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:36 pm to wmr
quote:
I mean, I literally watched planes ram into those buildings on live TV. I saw humans leaping to their deaths from a 110 story building.
Welcome to the club?
Plenty of us saw the same thing.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:39 pm to ProbyOne
quote:
Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.
And? It's called "Global Collapse".
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:39 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
Great, you just sent up the TX Tiger signal.
next post
hahahahahaha
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:40 pm to ProbyOne
quote:
although I did expect slight retardation in the thread.
Same. Although I expected it in the OP and was right
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:41 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Larry Silverstein " Pull IT , Then we saw it collapse. " - His words not mine . Explain, you seem to have the answers for the collapse now explain his statement .
would give you results we saw that afternoon.
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:42 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Where was WTC7 impacted, and by what?
Falling debris from the collapsing towers.
What does the "study" say caused the fires?
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:47 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
And the video of Larry Silverstein saying " Pull It " mean what to you?
You can't be serious. Pull the firefighting etc, teams out of harms way because it was evident that the building was going to collapse. The first visible signs of physical collapse were identified 6 or 7 hours before global failure. Good grief...this has been gone over 100's of times.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:49 pm to JoeHackett
Touché 
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:49 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
(practically into its own footprint, as in a controlled demolition).
bullshite. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Posted on 10/7/17 at 1:53 pm to olddawg26
quote:
olddawg26
This post was edited on 10/7/17 at 1:54 pm
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News