Started By
Message
locked post

Anybody remember when RUssia hacked the election?

Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:50 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:50 pm
quote:

The Russian's hacked the election when they thought Donald was going to loose.
Hawkeye007 LINK

quote:

There's no question of a Russian hacking campaign against our election.
DisplacedCuckeye LINK

quote:

hey have already confirmed that Russia hacked into the election process
LSUTANGERINE LINK

quote:

How bout the tradition of fake news claiming the Russians hacked the election without any evidence? Jesse Christ. I'll grant Trump one thing. He has succeeded in convincing his followers black is white and white is black. You guys are so misinformed it's pitiful.
a want LINK

quote:

because every intelligence gathering agency of the US knows that Russia interfered in the outcome of the most sacred part of our democracy, the transfer of power.
cruiserhog LINK

quote:

I guess it depends on how you want to define "hacking the election." Here's a pretty good article, with named sources, on the "hacking."
the spleen LINK

quote:

Russians hacked everyone. They picked the winner bannon wanted.
celticdog LINK

this is a good start.

The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
30328 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:51 pm to
I member
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37538 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:51 pm to
Bunch of idiots
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:53 pm to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38287 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"


Go back further. It wasn't insinuated UNTIL HILLARY LOST ON ELECTION NIGHT!

That's the thing we are all missing.

Why wasn't this brought up weeks, months, or a year before the election?

Didn't the gay Muslim president say that it was foolish to think Russia tampered with our election?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Go back further. It wasn't insinuated UNTIL HILLARY LOST ON ELECTION NIGHT!


Oh...Im only to March 15th.

next I'll probably go back to the 1st of the year.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10984 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:59 pm to
Same exact bunch of prevaricators now don't say boo about muh Russians and collusion but wail about 'lies', 'obstruction', and 'money'.

Craven, really...
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:01 pm to
I remember when there was some article about hacking the election machines, based on some believed abnormality, and the NYT, 538, etc. shot that hacking story down immediately.

Now, hacking into the campaigns, as some of those posts referenced, seems much more reasonable than actually hacking the election itself.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:02 pm to
quote:


The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"


I sense your fear brother.

It's okay...Trump will be fine...we both know he wasn't smart enough to collude with the Ruskies...

Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Now, hacking into the campaigns,


what does this even mean?
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:12 pm to
It means the goal posts have moved and they are still making up shite.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

what does this even mean?
quote:

what does this even mean?
It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.


why?

seriously. do you have any information on that?

oh, and that isnt hacking a campaign, that is hacking a citizen...and we know Podesta wasnt hacked. He was phished.

let's see you try again.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20233 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

this is a good start.


Dude, that's a tough list you made...all I see is a lot of
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12801 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak.


Wasn't it also determined that our IC had the ability to disguise their IP to make it appear that Russians were doing the hacking?
Posted by chickenpotpie
Member since Aug 2013
1161 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.


Russia may be a reasonable suspect, but the most reasonable suspect would be someone with direct access to the information, like most whistleblowers.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

why?

seriously. do you have any information on that?
No, but we know Russia is one of the major hacking countries, that's why I said:
quote:

They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
I'm just saying that it's reasonable to believe, not that it's 100% fact by any means. Arguing one way or the other as certainty would not be reasonable though.
quote:

oh, and that isnt hacking a campaign,
Well all campaign members are private citizens, but he was the Chairman of her Campaign when it occurred.
quote:

and we know Podesta wasnt hacked. He was phished.
Again. You're making some distinction when you know very well it's a minor technical distinction that most don't know about. Like anti-virus software is actually anti-malware for the most part since virus is only a type of malware. Besides phishing is often used as hacking:

HACKER LEXICON: WHAT IS PHISHING?
quote:

An estimated 91-percent of hacking attacks begin with a phishing or spear-phishing email.
quote:

let's see you try again.
I presented why I thought it was a REASONABLE argument, and you ignored that, and instead decided to play word games.

I don't know why you would have a problem with someone saying it's reasonable to suspect Russia may have been involved in these activities, although it's not reasonable to think they actually hacked the election itself.
Posted by DuncanIdaho
Ouray, CO
Member since Feb 2013
14970 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:31 pm to
I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. I'm sure it's nothing.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Russia may be a reasonable suspect, but the most reasonable suspect would be someone with direct access to the information, like most whistleblowers.
They may be true for the DNC leaks, but that doesn't make sense for the Podesta leaks given how the information was accessed.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

seriously. do you have any information on that?
No, but we know Russia is one of the major hacking countries, that's why I said:


literally EVERYONE is hacking. seriously?

quote:

I'm just saying that it's reasonable to believe, not that it's 100% fact by any means. Arguing one way or the other as certainty would not be reasonable though.


it would be even more reasonable to assume CHina then.

quote:

Well all campaign members are private citizens, but he was the Chairman of her Campaign when it occurred.


but they didnt hack him, they phished him.

quote:

I presented why I thought it was a REASONABLE argument,


based on your definition of reasonable....the US government is just as likely.

Fail again.

Let's see you try a third time!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram