- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Acting AG tells DOJ not to defend Trump order
Posted on 1/30/17 at 5:59 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 1/30/17 at 5:59 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:She can absolutely be fired as Actong/Deputy AG. That's a politically appointed position. It's much tougher to remove her from her position as a career DoJ SES.
That's not how this works. With that being said I don't think the ban is it illegal or unconstitutional
1
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:00 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.
What is his position in the administration?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:00 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted
Well that settles that........
IF this is true, this person should be directed by official government correspondence that the president expects the DOJ to immediately implement and defend asn necessary any and all presidential orders. The minute she fails to do so, she should be demoted or potentially fired.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:01 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
It's much tougher to remove her from her position as a career DoJ SES.
Direct insubordination may in fact be a fireable offense.
SET HER UP!!!
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:01 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.
Weird that it didn't ban people from all those other Muslim countries then. Would've been a lot more effective. That's like a billion Muslims that can still come here.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:02 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend
What religion?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:03 pm to Friscodog
quote:
What religion?
dafuq
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:03 pm to Five0
He's not in the administration which is interesting. His own interview Saturday admitted Trump asked Rudy to advise his people on how to craft the EO. RUDY HAS A BIG MOUTH.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:03 pm to Champagne
Reassign her arse to Barrow Alaska.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:04 pm to Sao
I know you know what hearsay is.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:05 pm to Sao
quote:Yeah, no.
Doing her job.
But you already know that.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:06 pm to sicboy
quote:
What religion?
Sao said that it was a ban against a religion.. so I asked him which one?? I don't recall seeing anything about a specific religion mentioned in the EO. If everyone is claiming it is a Muslim ban, then why are not Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, India and other predominately Muslim countries on the list? Does it ban British or EU citizens who are muslim from entering the US?? Nope.. therefore it is not a ban against a religion..
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:08 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.
I've seen this posted multiple times today, in the context of challenges to the EO. How is this relevant? The EO does not call our specifc religions, and Rudy is not in the administration. It doesn't matter what Trump may or may not have asked him. Why not argue the constitutionality of the EO based on the actual EO?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:09 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:These people are unbelievable!
Sally Yates, the Obama appointed Deputy AG.
God Bless America! it will be good to to see these 100% partisan hacks cleared out of presumed nonpartisan positions.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:09 pm to Sao
quote:
Rudy admitted it was for religion distinction this weekend.
I could've sworn that he said on Judge Jeanine's show that it was not religious in nature but security threat based. There isn't a religion named in the EO.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:12 pm to Navytiger74
Well said NT
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:14 pm to Sao
quote:
Doing her job.
Explain how an attorney in the public sector, in an office that from time to time acts as solicitor to the POTUS, is doing her job by releasing her opinion without permission of her client?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:15 pm to bamafan1001
She gone
Posted on 1/30/17 at 6:15 pm to Champagne
quote:
Mr. Trump has the authority to fire Ms. Yates, but as the top Senate-confirmed official at the Justice Department, she is the only one authorized to sign foreign surveillance warrants, an essential function at the department.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News