- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ACS Risk Biomarkers significantly increase after MRNA COVID-19 vaccines
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:16 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:16 am
quote:
The risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, according to a report presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2021, held from November 13 to 15, 2021.
cardiology advisor article/study
9
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:24 am to RyanMartin835
CoMpLeTeLy SaFe VaCcInE
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:40 am to RyanMartin835
Mengele is the father of our current medical system.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:51 am to RyanMartin835
Why don't you just go find the lengthy thread on this and link it?
Posted on 11/25/21 at 6:57 am to RyanMartin835
Some employers are going to end up bankrupt either from legit lawsuits they lose from forcing this or if they somehow win employees will sabotage from within. Trade secrets, intentional damage to infrastructure, IT, etc. Not that I condone any of that but folks arent just going to take massive reduction in health and lifestyle from a forced vax like a skip in the park
Posted on 11/25/21 at 7:04 am to RyanMartin835
We need a stickied thread at the top of this board with every reputable article published that lists negative side effects from these "vaccines."
There are many people who could really use quick access to those studies in one place.
There are many people who could really use quick access to those studies in one place.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 7:06 am to rattlebucket
quote:
Not that I condone any of that but folks arent just going to take massive reduction in health and lifestyle from a forced vax like a skip in the park
I think you’ll be surprised at what the sheep will take. Many of these people would get down and walk on all fours if the Gov overlords told them it would make them safer.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 7:07 am to ibldprplgld
quote:So this one wouldn't make it?
with every reputable article published
Posted on 11/25/21 at 7:33 am to RyanMartin835
My guess is these same biomarkers are increased after viral illness. These same biomarkers are increased after any vaccine. These markets are increased after anything that causes an inflammatory response by the body.
Are these risk markers general markers of inflammatory processes going on in the body?
Well don't work out to hard because guess what goes up? Some of these same markers.
Anyways these go down over time.
Are these risk markers general markers of inflammatory processes going on in the body?
Well don't work out to hard because guess what goes up? Some of these same markers.
Anyways these go down over time.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 7:52 am to CDawson
“Recent studies have shown that the Covid-19 virus loses potency the closer that viral particulates are to the ground. Studies show that the virus is 5x less potent at 3 feet above ground level than at 5 feet. We urge all Americans to remain below 3 feet at all times in order to effectively defeat the virus. Crawling, crab walking, slithering and other methods of ground level mobility are highly recommended as alternatives to upright mobility. We are all in this together and will soon be able to claim victory over this terrible virus if we all adhere to these new guidelines.”
If that absurd fictional statement was ever made by a government official, there would absolutely be some who would comply.
If that absurd fictional statement was ever made by a government official, there would absolutely be some who would comply.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:03 am to thetempleowl
It’s impossible to reason with the anti Vax crowd.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:15 am to LSUwag
quote:
It’s impossible to reason with the anti Vax crowd.
Because the pro COVId vaxx crowd does not use logic. If this vaccine worked the virus would be gone by now.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:16 am to LSUwag
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:17 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Why don't you just go find the lengthy thread on this and link it?
Why are you deflecting?
This is something that anyone considering being vaccinated should be aware of imho.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:19 am to RyanMartin835
Just get the jab guys
The “cure” is worse than the disease by a lot
The “cure” is worse than the disease by a lot
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:21 am to jimmy the leg
More covid deaths since the vaccine plus the additional deaths CAUSED by the vaccine yet they are being forced on everyone even children. How can any rational person still support this farce?
BTW I took the J&J shot so my worries aren't just hyperbole
BTW I took the J&J shot so my worries aren't just hyperbole
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:26 am to jimmy the leg
quote:I'm not. That's why I said link the lengthy thread from the other day. I have no intentions of going back through that. This was a sketchy Abstract given to AHA for their virtual "conference". AHA is not responsible for what is presented. It was presented and immediately raised some eyebrows. Can you tell us if PULS test is a better indicator of cardiac risk compared to say the fast CT calcium scoring system? Guess what; they can't either. But oh well, have at it.
Why are you deflecting?
This is something that anyone considering being vaccinated should be aware of imho.
BTW - I am refusing the booster because I have had some arthritic like symptoms since my original two shot Pfizer. I am searching for peer reviewed papers on vaccine causing acceleration of autoimmune issues. Can't say that I have found conclusive evidence yet. I toss out more than I accept. But, oh well, have at it.
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 8:31 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 8:43 am to Diamondawg
quote:
I'm not. That's why I said link the lengthy thread from the other day. I have no intentions of going back through that. This was a sketchy Abstract given to AHA for their virtual "conference". AHA is not responsible for what is presented. It was presented and immediately raised some eyebrows. Can you tell us if PULS test is a better indicator of cardiac risk compared to say the fast CT calcium scoring system? Guess what; they can't either. But oh well, have at it.
I for one am glad to see new threads start when warranted. Makes it easier to find.
Also, I take the evidence as it comes and discriminate according to source, as you seem to do. But it seems that different studies using different testing methods would be a good thing, not bad. They are adding to the body of evidence. Maybe future trials (which are universally called for in scientific studies) can identify the best methods as well as create a preponderance of evidence in this relatively new field of study - covid vaccine connection to heart and vascular issues. There needs to be a mountain of evidence to convince people to take this seriously.
I’m sure this presentation to AHA is to gain more credibility since that is the entity that people listen to for policy change.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:14 am to Diamondawg
quote:
This was a sketchy Abstract given to AHA for their virtual "conference". AHA is not responsible for what is presented. It was presented and immediately raised some eyebrows.
That’s your opinion and anecdotal. Irrelevant.
quote:
Can you tell us if PULS test is a better indicator of cardiac risk compared to say the fast CT calcium scoring system?
Does it matter? AHA still published it. It looks like they had a good sample based on tests that they normally run. They are reporting an increase in bio markers based on their normal day-to-day procedures. Their results (along with yours I might add) are concerning.
I see my doctor on Monday. I’m telling him I’m not taking any booster until the data is more reliable and not coming from the CDC.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 9:30 am to bluestem75
quote:My understanding is that it was a presentation at a conference.
Does it matter? AHA still published it.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News