- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:20 pm to Strannix
quote:
Hillary was Secretary of State 2009-2013
And as such she would have no authority over the CIA.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:49 pm to Bmath
quote:
The title of the OP says they were CIA agents. Yet the article says they were simply local informants helping the CIA. Seems a bit misleading, no?
They were still US intelligence assets, and they are no less dead.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:52 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
anks Hillary! Thanks John!
What do they have to do with this? I think your outrage should be directed at the CIA Director.
And there is a wide belief that a mole may have exposed these assets.
This post was edited on 5/21/17 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:54 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
And as such she would have no authority over the CIA.
What she did have authority over where the top secret SCIF documents on her toilet server were located that was hacked, we know she exposed one agent in Iran who was executed
LINK
I'm sure you remember the scientist who was executed right???
This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 7:25 am
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:55 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
What do they have to do with this?
This is why you don't keep classified docs on a toilet server
Posted on 5/21/17 at 8:55 pm to Sidicous
quote:
We must act to investigate this tampering in a duly recognized and established government. Who's up for a Special Counsel to look into this?
Upvote, but only if there were "enhanced interrogation techniques employed"?
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:19 pm to Strannix
Were these American citizens they executed or Chinese citizens working for the CIA?
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:35 pm to deltaland
quote:Chinese citizens.
Were these American citizens they executed or Chinese citizens working for the CIA?
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:37 pm to Strannix
12 CIA agents, Benghazi, Vince Foster, Seth Rich, etc.
Hillary just doesn't give a shite. Lock her up already!
Hillary just doesn't give a shite. Lock her up already!
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:38 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
And as such she would have no authority over the CIA.
So what?
Every issue facing the government would come across her desk. Even an oblique mention of "sources in China," might get the ball rolling until our intel network is rolled up.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:53 pm to Strannix
quote:a) She had classified documents, including some top secret. She did not have a full download of secret documents. She would not have access to the CIA documents regarding Chinese govt assets.
What she did have authority over were the top secret SCIF documents on her toilet server that was hacked, we no she exposed one agent in Iran who was executed
B) Her emails were never hacked. Her email had nothing to do with it.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:55 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:Her emails were never hacked. As I understand it, some official state department emails were. Regardless, she would not have asset information.
So what?
Every issue facing the government would come across her desk. Even an oblique mention of "sources in China," might get the ball rolling until our intel network is rolled up.
And no, not everything the government handles would go across her desk. Not even close.
This post was edited on 5/21/17 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 5/21/17 at 9:56 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
I used to think Decatur was the biggest Hillary shill on this board but you come to her defense in every thread
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:06 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Except that I thought she should go to prison for FOIA violations.
I used to think Decatur was the biggest Hillary shill on this board but you come to her defense in every thread
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:25 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
And no, not everything the government handles would go across her desk. Not even close.
Well, of course not -everything-. I misspoke.
"Former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills acknowledged in written answers to questions from the conservative group Judicial Watch that when emails from Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal began appearing online via a Romanian hacker called Guccifer, Mills discussed the issue with Bryan Pagliano, a tech specialist who worked both at the State Department and for the Clintons.
“In or around March 2013, when the email account of Sidney Blumenthal was compromised by a hacker known as Guccifer. As I recall, these discussions involved whether this event might affect Secretary Clinton’s email,” Mills said in the written answers. The response, dated July 11 and released Wednesday by Judicial Watch, was a follow-up to questions Mills declined to answer at a May deposition in a Freedom of Information Act suit brought by the group.
It was already known that Clinton’s camp was aware of Guccifer’s hack of Blumenthal and took at least one step in response: changing Clinton's email address because it was exposed in messages in Blumenthal’s account. It’s unclea whether Clinton aides took any other security steps at the time.
The March 2013 discussions took place a month or two after Clinton stepped down as secretary of state. Mills left State shortly after Clinton.
Mills agreed to answer the written questions from Judicial Watch in order to head off further litigation in the case about whether her answers were sufficiently complete. At the May deposition, she and her lawyer declined to answer some questions citing attorney-client privilege.
The deposition took place a few days after Romanian national Marcel Lazar pled guilty to hacking offenses in a federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. He was extradited from his home country to the U.S. in March to face the charges, which included hacking into email accounts belonging to Blumenthal as well as former Secretary of State Colin Powell and a relative of former Presidents George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush."
LINK
Bad enough. Blumenthal had access to classified information with no clearance.
This post was edited on 5/21/17 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:27 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
12 CIA agents, Benghazi, Vince Foster, Seth Rich, etc.
Hillary just doesn't give a shite. Lock her up already!
It is unfortunate that the GOP either has no balls or they are all one giant happy family...minus one president.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:31 pm to Strannix
quote:
How about the New York Times
Cuck bitch
Informants, not agents. fricking limp dick. Read the articles you link.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:32 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Hillary’s EmailGate Goes Nuclear
Does the latest release of Hillary’s State Department emails include highly classified U.S. intelligence?
By John R. Schindler • 01/09/16 5:49pm
Back in October I told you that Hillary Clinton’s email troubles were anything but over, and that the scandal over her misuse of communications while she was Secretary of State was sure to get worse. Sure enough, EmailGate continues to be a thorn in the side of Ms. Clinton’s presidential campaign and may have just entered a new, potentially explosive phase with grave ramifications, both political and legal.
The latest court-ordered dump of her email, just placed online by the State Department, brings more troubles for Team Hillary. This release of over 3,000 pages includes 66 “Unclassified” messages that the State Department subsequently determined actually were classified; however, all but one of those 66 were deemed Confidential, the lowest classification level, while one was found to be Secret, bringing the total of Secret messages discovered so far to seven. In all, 1,340 Hillary emails at State have been reassessed as classified.
There are gems here. It’s hard to miss the irony of Ms. Clinton expressing surprise about a State Department staffer using personal email for work, which the Secretary of State noted in her own personal email. More consequential was Ms Clinton ordering a staffer to send classified talking points for a coming meeting via a non-secure fax machine, stripped of their classification markings. This appears to be a clear violation of federal law and the sort of thing that is a career-ender, or worse, for normals.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee termed that July 2011 incident “disturbing,” and so it is to anyone acquainted with U.S. Government laws and regulations regarding the handling of classified material.
But the biggest problem may be in a just-released email that has gotten little attention here, but plenty on the other side of the world. An email to Ms. Clinton from a close Clinton confidant late on June 8, 2011 about Sudan turns out to have explosive material in it. This message includes a detailed intelligence report from Sid Blumenthal, Hillary’s close friend, confidant and factotum, who regularly supplied her with information from his private intelligence service. His usual source was Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA senior official and veteran spy-gadfly, who conveniently died just before EmailGate became a serious problem for Hillary’s campaign.
In fact, the June 8, 2011 Blumenthal report doesn’t read like CIA material at all, in other words human intelligence or HUMINT, but very much like signals intelligence or SIGINT. (For the differences see here). I know what SIGINT reports look like, because I used to write them for the National Security Agency, America’s biggest source of intelligence. SIGINT reports, which I’ve read thousands of, have a very distinct style and flavor to them and Blumenthal’s write-up matches it, right down to the “Source Comments,” which smack very much of NSA reporting and its “house rules.”
LINK
Blumenthal -was- hacked.
Does the latest release of Hillary’s State Department emails include highly classified U.S. intelligence?
By John R. Schindler • 01/09/16 5:49pm
Back in October I told you that Hillary Clinton’s email troubles were anything but over, and that the scandal over her misuse of communications while she was Secretary of State was sure to get worse. Sure enough, EmailGate continues to be a thorn in the side of Ms. Clinton’s presidential campaign and may have just entered a new, potentially explosive phase with grave ramifications, both political and legal.
The latest court-ordered dump of her email, just placed online by the State Department, brings more troubles for Team Hillary. This release of over 3,000 pages includes 66 “Unclassified” messages that the State Department subsequently determined actually were classified; however, all but one of those 66 were deemed Confidential, the lowest classification level, while one was found to be Secret, bringing the total of Secret messages discovered so far to seven. In all, 1,340 Hillary emails at State have been reassessed as classified.
There are gems here. It’s hard to miss the irony of Ms. Clinton expressing surprise about a State Department staffer using personal email for work, which the Secretary of State noted in her own personal email. More consequential was Ms Clinton ordering a staffer to send classified talking points for a coming meeting via a non-secure fax machine, stripped of their classification markings. This appears to be a clear violation of federal law and the sort of thing that is a career-ender, or worse, for normals.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee termed that July 2011 incident “disturbing,” and so it is to anyone acquainted with U.S. Government laws and regulations regarding the handling of classified material.
But the biggest problem may be in a just-released email that has gotten little attention here, but plenty on the other side of the world. An email to Ms. Clinton from a close Clinton confidant late on June 8, 2011 about Sudan turns out to have explosive material in it. This message includes a detailed intelligence report from Sid Blumenthal, Hillary’s close friend, confidant and factotum, who regularly supplied her with information from his private intelligence service. His usual source was Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA senior official and veteran spy-gadfly, who conveniently died just before EmailGate became a serious problem for Hillary’s campaign.
In fact, the June 8, 2011 Blumenthal report doesn’t read like CIA material at all, in other words human intelligence or HUMINT, but very much like signals intelligence or SIGINT. (For the differences see here). I know what SIGINT reports look like, because I used to write them for the National Security Agency, America’s biggest source of intelligence. SIGINT reports, which I’ve read thousands of, have a very distinct style and flavor to them and Blumenthal’s write-up matches it, right down to the “Source Comments,” which smack very much of NSA reporting and its “house rules.”
LINK
Blumenthal -was- hacked.
This post was edited on 5/21/17 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 5/21/17 at 10:37 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Hillary was Secretary of State 2009-2013
And as such she would have no authority over the CIA.
They were working hand in hand with CIA and the private sector companies and non profits that were involved in that period and built themselves based on the tons of cash that gave them life are now 100% fully on board for supporting anything the deep state wants to do. I've had discussions with some of these that were either ex CIA that were now working for these type companies or were still CIA and just weren't admitting it. They were proud of their business model which was based on money coming from State Department starting with the Hillary era and were fully on board for the Muh Russians story. This was a company that was directly involved in cybersecurity during that period in the russian sector. We had higher capabilities at cyber than they did and they were feeling us out as we were them. Soros was mentioned as a source for funding as well. This was the only time I ever ran across anyone in that field other than Homeland Security that believed in the Russian story.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News