re: Got a new gun today. The Glock 43

No reason for that gun to be over $500. Should be 450 or less.

Everyone's jacking em up since they're hard to get. 479 should be the standard

$358 for blue label

the gun is worth every bit of $550.... if people are willing to pay it. Whatever people will pay, thats its worth. Too much glock hate in here because its the cool thing to do. I have a sig, ruger, smith and wesson, taurus, and yep a glock, even worse... a glock 42 OMG! Guess what? It shoots better than any other small 380 i have shot and is much more comfortable to shoot. It eats any ammo, and goes bang every time. The glock hate gets old.

I tend to agree the 43 is a tad overpriced... Would've been nice to see it going for closer to what a shield costs. I quality for blue label so I'll still be able to get a good deal once they are routinely in stock.

I'd actually really like doing a review on one when someone gives me the opportunity even though I'm not a big Glock dude. The main reason is that this and the 42 are finally something different. They joined all the other companies making single stack 9mms finally.

I'd be willing to compare it to a Shield and my personal CM9. But I'm also a realist and think the G43 should be on the market for a while before people jump to say it's the best thing since sliced bread. Every gun usually has teething issues when first hitting the market.

But I do know this - Glock will sell TONS of these things.

quote:

---

Said it ran fine but is shooting low

---

Luckily that's a pretty small problem.