Started By
Message

re: Alonzo mourning says Jordan would average 50 today.

Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:47 am to
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2229 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Kobe wants to go back to the time when 1 on 1 basketball was king. Back then, the game was better for superior scorers (Jordan, Olajuwon, even Kobe). Now, it's more difficult for the stars while elevating the worth of role players.


This is a great point! I tried to explain in another post the rising value of true rim protectors in today's game. My fellow Pelicans fans don't want to believe it but Asik will get 11-12 million from a year this offseason, in large part because of the way the game is played today and the value of bigs that can hold the lane. This is also why guys like Gobert or D. Jordan are going to be max players. 20 years ago bigs with their skill sets were not nearly as valuable because the game overly valued 1 on 1 skills.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23111 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:52 am to
quote:

I just want to hear one person address the fact that the 80s had the worst defense in NBA history, as well has the most points scored in NBA history, and MJ couldnt come even close to 50 ppg. Explain how he would today. Go



I haven't seen anyone say he would get 50. I said he could get to 40, and I mainly base that on the belief he could get to the line a lot more with the euro step and with the lack of all time greats inside. There were 3 years he averaged over 33 ppg. I don't think it is outrageous to think he could have put together a couple 40 point seasons with the way fouls are called today.

50, I agree, pretty much impossible
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Flagrant fouls have been in place for 25 years
Well yeah but weren't called any where close to as much as they are today.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23111 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:54 am to
And just so I'm clear, are we saying that if Harden went back and played in the 80s/90s we think he would average 40?
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 9:55 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110698 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:55 am to
quote:

I haven't seen anyone say he would get 50. I said he could get to 40, and I mainly base that on the belief he could get to the line a lot more with the euro step and with the lack of all time greats inside. There were 3 years he averaged over 33 ppg. I don't think it is outrageous to think he could have put together a couple 40 point seasons with the way fouls are called today.
It's outrageous because he maxed out at 37ppg against teams not even trying defensively in the 80s, it was that bad. If you ever catch those Lakers-Finals on ESPN Classic from the 80s, watch it for 10 minutes. You'll be blown away by how little D they played, and tht's the NBA Finals, not even a regular season game.

So how can he then get to 40 when defense isn't nearly as bad as it was then...and I'm guessing pace is down as well from the 80s.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43077 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 9:55 am to
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 10:02 am to
I know MJ is the greatest of all-time, but Kobe could keep up with him scoring. If he couldn't sniff 40ppg, there is no way in hell MJ could average 50. Maybe 40, but he couldn't even do that in an era known for poor defense.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33793 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 10:30 am to
quote:

That really is all it is, "everything was better back in my day!!!"


This latest generation is particularly annoying. Now that the NBA is back on its feet they want to shite on it. They don't want anyone to like today's game.

I was an MJ fan in my teen years 20 years ago. But his legend has outgrown his game. Comments like Zo's clearly illustrate that. I respect Zo but that doesn't mean he didn't go full retard with his comment.
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 10:32 am
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8235 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 10:49 am to
MJ is GOAT. But Zo is ridiculous.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127381 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:

flagrant fouls for hard fouls.


You must have missed all of the hard fouling in the 80s and 90s.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17096 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 10:57 am to
quote:

It's outrageous because he maxed out at 37ppg against teams not even trying defensively in the 80s


When he "maxed out" that was arguably not his peak as an offensive player anyway.

If Kobe got to 35.4, the question is how much more would Jordan be capable of. It certainly isn't 50. My guess is 37 or 38...he would have to get to the line more than he did in the early 90s and simply shoot/make more 3pters to get there as well. I don't think it is 40 either.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:05 am to
quote:

he couldn't even do that in an era known for poor defense.


lol wut?
Posted by Chaos_Actual
Member since Mar 2015
431 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:11 am to
And he'd run uphill both ways on the court?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:12 am to
quote:

lol wut?
The 80s is known as the worst defensive era in NBA history. This isnt even debated by anyone. So what is your question?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

The 80s is known as the worst defensive era in NBA history. This isnt even debated by anyone


Do you have a link?

quote:

lsupride87


or is this just your idiotic opinion?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Do you have a link?
League Average eFG%

'80s: .491
'90s: .488
'00s: .484

League Average PPG

'80s: 109.3
'90s: 101.0
'00s: 96.9

% of Points from the Freethrow line

'80s: 20.3
'90s: 19.8
'00s: 19.5


Ill take my apology by you kissing my arse
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 11:16 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110698 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

lol wut?
You think what of NBA defense in the 80s?
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27304 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:18 am to
Also, you could watch games from the 80's and you can see for yourself how bad the defense was.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:19 am to


So let's see....do you understand basic points of statistics:

quote:

League Average eFG%


FG% is determinant of defense? or could players be better shooters? For your argument to hold, all players would have to shoot the same percentage in every decade.

quote:

League Average PPG



Hmmm, good thing there were no rule changes, and that PPG only depends on defense.

quote:

% of Points from the Freethrow line


we wont even get into statistical significance.




What a fool, you cant even prove your point. But you're a mental midget on tRant...might as well extend your asshatery here too.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110698 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Also, you could watch games from the 80's and you can see for yourself how bad the defense was
10 minutes, tops. That's all it takes, and everything you thought you remembered about the NBA in the 1980s, you'll realize it was nothing like you thought it was.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram