- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Two Teens Have Sex. Neither Could Legally Consent, But the Boy Gets a Felony
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:13 pm
LINK
This is so fricked....
This is so fricked....
quote:
Kentucky Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of "B.H.," who was 15-years-old when he was charged with sexual misconduct and possessing pornographic material featuring a minor (the latter is a felony charge). B.H. was in trouble for having sex with his 13-year-old girlfriend and exchanging nude pictures with her. The acts were voluntary, though neither teen could legally consent to sexual activities since they were both underage at the time.
The girl's parents went to the cops when they found out, and B.H. was prosecuted. (Even though his parents could technically have done the same thing to his girlfriend, they opted against that course of action.) He plead guilty, had to register as a sex offender, and was remanded to a youth treatment center for almost a year.
17
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:16 pm to SuperSaint
Why would he plead guilty?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:16 pm to SuperSaint
our laws in this regard are ancient and need a COMPLETE revision
just like we need to revisit how we deal with "lack of consent while drunk" and rape. the system is way slanted against the man, even if both people rape each other
just like we need to revisit how we deal with "lack of consent while drunk" and rape. the system is way slanted against the man, even if both people rape each other
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:17 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:Not sure... reading it, there is a little bit more to it, and I think the prosecutor did his damndest to paint the boy in a bad light. But either way it stands that
Why would he plead guilty?
quote:
Neither Could Legally Consent
Everyone has to protect little susie from herself I guess
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:18 pm to SuperSaint
i like how she wasn't charged with possession of child porn also, when thee article implies she had nude pics of him
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can this be overturned retroactively? The registry at least
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:19 pm to SuperSaint
That is just crazy.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:19 pm to SuperSaint
I wonder if the hardline "letter of the law" crowd will applaud the DA's Office
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:20 pm to SuperSaint
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/8/20 at 10:50 am
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:21 pm to SuperSaint
that is ridiculous. The law is not serving the people in any way with that type of heavy handed decision.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
very archaic and there are tons of examples of how arse backwards our government operates. May take blood in the streets Jake.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:22 pm to TexasTiger39
quote:
umm this is why she didn't get charged
The girl's parents went to the cops when they found out, and B.H. was prosecuted. (Even though his parents could technically have done the same thing to his girlfriend, they opted against that course of action.)
I don't think you can keep the government from prosecuting child pornography.
Could you imagine what would happen if you could? The DA elected not to pursue it against the girl. Double standard.
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:23 pm to Sao
quote:
Can this be overturned retroactively? The registry at least
possibly
it can definitely be retroactive the other way. if the legislature changes a law to be an offense requiring registration, they can force people who have pled to that law prior to the change to register.
how you like dem apples?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:23 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
Assistant Attorney General Gregory Fuchs maintais that B.H. pressured the girl and had been involved in one other incident—a prank of a sexual nature—that justified his punishment:
He also cites the girl's testimony that B.H. said he "would tell me what to do and how to do it," and says B.H. was more culpable because he sent the first photo and threatened to tell friends they were having sex if she didn't send him one back.
There you go
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:23 pm to TexasTiger39
quote:
Regardless of your age, possession of a sexually explicit photo of a minor is possession of child pornography.
it sounds like she had his pics, too, though
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:24 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/8/20 at 10:50 am
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:24 pm to SuperSaint
The American justice system needs a complete overhaul, but that will never happen.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:24 pm to chilge1
quote:
and says B.H. was more culpable because he sent the first photo
ok confirmed. she should have been prosecuted for possession of child pornography
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:25 pm to chilge1
They were already having sex which she agreed to do. The boy was 15. If you don't think this is heavy handed then I don't know what to tell you.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 6:25 pm to SuperSaint
That is so fricked up
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News