- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
7 matches for Cisse and 6 for Evans...
Posted on 3/7/15 at 6:59 am
Posted on 3/7/15 at 6:59 am
What say the SB? Too harsh, too light or just right?
8
Posted on 3/7/15 at 6:59 am to TFTC
Harsh.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 7:36 am to TFTC
About right. Spitting at someone is so freaking low.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 7:42 am to TFTC
This just says to me that the FA would rather you lash out and kick someone than spit on them. So if it gets heated, just kick the fricker and take 3 games. Spitting at someone is low, but I have given up on trying to figure the FA out.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 7:42 am to bbap
Evans should get more for lying about it when it was on camera.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 7:52 am to Bho
For the record, I would rather be hit or kicked than spit on. That shite is disgusting.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 7:57 am to SwaggerCopter
I was guessing it would be about this and seems about on par, given the FAs history...
Posted on 3/7/15 at 8:03 am to TFTC
I think it's fair.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 8:49 am to TFTC
I'm biased obviously but I think it's harsh. At this point we're without over half of our regular first team for one reason or another. Thank god we beat Villa because I don't know how we're going to score any goals.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 10:04 am
Posted on 3/7/15 at 9:01 am to TFTC
I think its a bit harsh, but what I really don't understand is why the difference? If anything, it makes more sense for Evans to have the larger amount of games.
He spit first.
He denied he spit.
Cisse at least admitted it and apologized well before the FA was going to rule?
He spit first.
He denied he spit.
Cisse at least admitted it and apologized well before the FA was going to rule?
Posted on 3/7/15 at 9:12 am to Tigerstark
quote:
I think its a bit harsh, but what I really don't understand is why the difference? If anything, it makes more sense for Evans to have the larger amount of games.
I think Cisse has another ban or something else going on, which is why it is 7.
I truly don't get why they treat this way more harshly then other things.
Make a near leg snapping tackle that doesn't get caught by the ref, no issue. Spit on someone, get a 6 game ban.
Posted on 3/7/15 at 10:04 am to RTR America
quote:
I think Cisse has another ban or something else going on, which is why it is 7.
yeah he had another incident earlier in the season. it wasn't spitting but he shoved a guy I think.
This post was edited on 3/7/15 at 10:05 am
Posted on 3/7/15 at 10:32 am to TFTC
Good enough for me
spitting is disgusting
spitting is disgusting
Posted on 3/8/15 at 6:35 am to TFTC
Getting spit on is one of the ultimate insults. It's vile.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News