Bunkley also coming back (~$3m paycut)...

reliable depth

Bunk and Colston had high dead money numbers (as does Evans which is why I can see him stay with a pay cut).

If they are coming back for close to the dead money numbers it makes more sense to keep them.

PT had very little dead money, sadly. Bush and White better watch out too.

Yup that's what I figured. Likely around the dead money number.

It's very good depth for our run d. Now he just needs to stay healthy dammit.

Dude was awful? What the frick were you watching. Dude is a run stuffing machine and that's why we have him.

As someone said our run d went to shite when he went down.

quote:

---

Larry Holder ?@LarryHolder 2h2 hours ago
Can confirm Brodrick Bunkley agreed to take paycut to stay w: #Saints, via source. Told deal mirror image of last year. Near $3M in savings

---

Looks like he's not making too much more than the vet min.

So we started almost 24 over the cap now we are 10.2 over. Loomis is being Loomis

Not even considering other moves, Galette puts us at or under the cap whether traded or restructured.

Then you have a bunch of other possible moves(I just listed in another thread).

On Bunk, yeah the pay cut about equals the dead money and he couldn't take much less because of the vet minimum.

quote:

---

If they are coming back for close to the dead money numbers it makes more sense to keep them.

---

Exactly. You have to fill out the roster so if you can fill the spot with a similar cost as cutting that player, you might as well keep them. Especially if they perform when healthy.