Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Older guys and boxing fans

Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:07 pm
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30852 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:07 pm
If Floyd and Manny were to fight in May where would it rank, in terms of build up, interest, excitement, relevance etc... in the pantheon of boxing greatest fights?
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17995 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:10 pm to
I think it would be similar to Tyson/Lennox.

Huge build...not that great of a fight. The venue sucked too
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:18 pm to
It would be second right behind the Boston Strong Boy John Sullivan vs. Gentleman Jim Corbett.

This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 3:24 pm
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:20 pm to
Rating it up against Hagler/Hearns,Ali/Frasier 1,2,
Ali/Foreman....

It's a great fight but in my opinion it's not a Classic,unless it is.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29206 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:23 pm to
I'm not a boxing fan, but even with ESPN, social media, the internet etc. current matchups don't come close to the hype and excitement of yesteryear.

It was huge "back in the day."
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51807 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:25 pm to
The hype would dwarf any of the past "mega-fights." It wouldn't even be close, which is more of a shame that it more than likely won't happen.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 3:33 pm to
I'm over it. If it happens, fine, but I'm not clamoring to see it. Both of these guys are in their mid to late 30s.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260816 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 4:19 pm to
I don't keep up with it anymore, but when boxing was on network TV in the 70's it was at it's best.
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
17047 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 4:26 pm to
I'd put it in the Top 10 fights of the last 50 years.

But nowhere near the greatest fight ever- Hagler/Hearns.
Posted by COTiger
Colorado
Member since Dec 2007
16844 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I don't keep up with it anymore, but when boxing was on network TV in the 70's it was at it's best.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101471 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 4:39 pm to
The days of the average Joe getting up for 'big fights' has long since sailed.

Sad.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18436 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 4:45 pm to
Al Haymon is working on bringing boxing back to network and cable. He already struck a deal with NBC. Plus he has CBS, Spike TV and other rumored channels. Supposedly he wants to drive premium channels and PPV out of the sport. This is actually a time-buy: he's paying networks to show his fights. He has a bunch of investors behind him to kick off his new boxing series "Premier Boxing Champions".

Haymon is a very shady figure in the sport who stays hidden. He's smart as shite though. Even has a termination clause in his fighters contracts that says they can't say anything negative about him in public. I guess that's why they make sure they thank him in ever damn post fight interview. Haymon is the man who made Floyd the money man that he is today. And Floyd likes to claim he's the boss but always remember that it's Haymon that's really running shite.

It's pretty incredible how mysterious this man is. There are only a handful of photos of him, he's never seen at fights, refuses to talk to the media, refuses to talk business face to face, etc. But there is no doubt he's the most powerful man in the sport. What's also interesting is he's basically signing everyone now and the rumor is he wants to start his own league, create his own belts, etc. just like the UFC.

The strangest of all though is he's called an "advisor" by his clients. It's illegal to both manage and promote fighters. That's why the Ali Act was created. But everyone with common sense in the sport knows he's managing and promoting. He's just using DiBella entertainment right now the way he used to use Golden Boy Promotions. They put their logo on everything, charge a fee and let Haymon call all the shots.

Just a few notes on the man who's attempting to turn boxing into the UFC and put it all over television.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 4:54 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20416 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Y.A. Tittle
The days of the average Joe getting up for 'big fights' has long since sailed.

yep
quote:

Al Haymon is working on bringing boxing back to network and cable. He already struck a deal with NBC. Plus he has CBS, Spike TV and other rumored channels. Supposedly he wants to drive premium channels and PPV out of the sport
This would be good. I was a HUGE boxing fan back in the day, but I can't tell you the last time I've seen a marquee fighter on TV. I'm just not going to drop 50 bucks (or whatever it costs now) on guys I've never seen, for a fight that might last less than 3 minutes potentially. Just won't.

Whatever the plan is, we need fights on TV. Not drama, not hype, but fights. You need to see the actual boxers a few times, and then their own skill becomes the hype: I couldn't have cared less what Leonard or Hearns said about each other (for example), but I wanted to see Sugar Ray against the Hitman. Because I already knew, from watching, that those were two bad men in the ring.

Or Tyson- we saw him on ESPN and/or the networks a number of times coming up, and that's when he became known as such a beast. It was okay to go PPV for some title fights once he was already established, but we got to see him first.

As to the OP- Mayweather vs Pacchio would be the biggest fight since De La Hoya vs Trinidad, but not bigger. And it wouldn't make top ten in anything other than money; plenty of lesser grossing fights would be more remembered.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

where would it rank, in terms of build up, interest, excitement, relevance etc...


Not nearly as high as it would have 6 years ago.
Posted by Tigerntx
NOLA
Member since Jul 2011
1309 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 5:36 pm to
Shame the sport has been overrun by MMA & UFC - just glad I was around for the good years & glad to be able to still offer a comment
Posted by Geaux8686
Location Location
Member since Oct 2014
2617 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I'd put it in the Top 10 fights of the last 50 years.

But nowhere near the greatest fight ever- Hagler/Hearns.


No way. They are both too old. Manny isn't the same boxer he was 5 years ago and now Mayweather wants to fight. Ha.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30852 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:29 pm to
I agree with you guys. I was in a long argument today with two buddies, one a big boxing fan, who claim it would be the biggest fight of all time even now and that it wasn't even really close.

I couldn't believe it.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27005 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:30 pm to
Pre Manny getting put to sleep? Up there with Ali/Frazier.

But no true way to compare. 1970's world was much different. A fight could capture the world. Now there Are too many distractions. And like it or not UFC is here and split off many fans. Boxing is to blame for this as well.

I am old enough to recall Ali. But only during his decline.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:07 pm to
wouldn't come close to any big fight before the 90s ... don't know all of the big fights in the post 90s, but boxing back then was truly a big sport prior to the 90s (or whenever it fell off) ...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram