- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better Super Bowl career: 4-0 or 3-3?
Posted on 1/20/15 at 8:54 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Posted on 1/20/15 at 8:54 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
A couple fluke plays from being 5-0
Usually a cop out but for BB it's so true.
Tyree
Welker drop would have probably clinched it.
Wild stuff
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 8:55 pm
0
Posted on 1/20/15 at 9:11 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
A couple fluke plays from being 5-0
this
Posted on 1/20/15 at 9:20 pm to Chair
3-3
Posted on 1/20/15 at 10:06 pm to shel311
4 in 6 years is pretty damn good. I'll take Noll over Bellichek. Just my opinion.
Posted on 1/21/15 at 7:54 am to Chair
Good question, but I'd say 4-0. Just an opinion.
Side note: I love when dummies don't get why 2-2 is better than 2-0.
Side note: I love when dummies don't get why 2-2 is better than 2-0.
Posted on 1/21/15 at 7:59 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:The best offense of all time scores 14 in the super bowl, and the narrative is that the Pats lost on a fluke play.
Tiger A couple fluke plays from being 5-0
Three years later, the third best offense scores 17 in the super bowl, and "fluke play" is the narrative.
The fact is that in eight of the last 10 seasons, new England's season has ended on a Patriots' offense choke.
Posted on 1/21/15 at 8:06 am to ballscaster
Is 1-1 better than 0-4? If Seattle loses does this make Pete Carroll and Russell Wilson better than Marv Levey and Jim Kelley?
Posted on 1/21/15 at 8:15 am to dante
quote:Not sure.
Is 1-1 better than 0-4? If Seattle loses does this make Pete Carroll and Russell Wilson better than Marv Levey and Jim Kelley?
Is this to say that you don't get why 2-2 is better than 2-0?
Posted on 1/21/15 at 8:21 am to ballscaster
The difference is the parity in the NFL now due to free agency. The Cowboys of the 1990s were the last dynasty team that stayed intact for 5+ years. Belichick had to trade off the core of his teams from the early 2000s (Seymour, Ty Law, Milloy, etc) and still maintained his success. The three that have made it to SBs since his last title have all been 90% new teams.
Posted on 1/21/15 at 9:02 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
Salary cap era> non salary cap era
Even Jim Haslett or Mike Smith could have won 2 Super Bowls with Chuck Noll's Steelers.
Posted on 1/21/15 at 10:02 am to shel311
quote:I'm gonna disagree with myself here.
There's no argument to say 3-3 is better than 4-0 based on your wording, Super Bowl Career
I think I was thinking more team oriented. But assuming it's individual oriented, I'd need to know how the individual performed before answering.
But of course, I'd assume any player would take 4-0 over 3-3, but that doesn't mean they had a better Super Bowl Career going 4-0, it just means their team won more.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News