- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Frick You Bill De Blasio.You are Fricking toast. Liberal Shitebag.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:40 pm to Volmanac
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:40 pm to Volmanac
quote:
please list and provide links to the people who are supporting the killers actions. Just one. You are no better than the liberals.
I told you Twitter and FB were blowing up with attaboys for the killer.
You responded with the comment above.
Still waiting on that apology.
Be a big boy.
You can do it.
Like Mommy showed you.
1
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:03 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Selling tshirts without an official trademark on them. He just got tazed for that
I think I speak for most everyone on TD when I say had I known about his rather extensive rap sheet detailing his heinous crimes that I wouldn't have been opposed to shooting this dangerous criminal on sight
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:15 pm to bencoleman
I wish I could get the board liberals to be so enthusiastic about "frivolous tax-laws" when they go to the voting both and/or elect candidates.
Liberals decide to abolish smoking through confiscatory taxing policy. Liberals pass Draconian tax making a pack of cigarettes cost as much as a good meal. Liberals are so pleased with new laws they even nominate Democrat Vice Presidential candidate who made 100,000,000 dollars suing the tobacco companies.
Flash forward a decade or so-some dude living on the margins trying to scratch out a living gets wacked by cops enforcing draconian tobacco-taxes. Liberals finally get curious about wisdom of tax laws. Liberals quickly forget and vote for 1000 new laws. Easier to blame on cops/Republicans/Easter Bunny. Liberals like taxes and laws. But God forbid the police enforce those same laws they demand be enacted.
Liberals decide to abolish smoking through confiscatory taxing policy. Liberals pass Draconian tax making a pack of cigarettes cost as much as a good meal. Liberals are so pleased with new laws they even nominate Democrat Vice Presidential candidate who made 100,000,000 dollars suing the tobacco companies.
Flash forward a decade or so-some dude living on the margins trying to scratch out a living gets wacked by cops enforcing draconian tobacco-taxes. Liberals finally get curious about wisdom of tax laws. Liberals quickly forget and vote for 1000 new laws. Easier to blame on cops/Republicans/Easter Bunny. Liberals like taxes and laws. But God forbid the police enforce those same laws they demand be enacted.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:25 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Twitter and FB were blowing up with attaboys for the killer
Twitter and Facebook? Okay
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:30 pm to Tactical1
You are one of the four/five worst posters here, for the record.
A TRUE drive-by Emoticon Warrior.
Emoticons are awesome-I love them-but not JUST the emoticon.
Upon occasion just an emoticon will suffice, sure.
A little substance would be nice though.
But your post history reveals you as a true featherweight.
Just saying.
A TRUE drive-by Emoticon Warrior.
Emoticons are awesome-I love them-but not JUST the emoticon.
Upon occasion just an emoticon will suffice, sure.
A little substance would be nice though.
But your post history reveals you as a true featherweight.
Just saying.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:43 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
You are one of the four/five worst posters here, for the record.
A TRUE drive-by Emoticon Warrior.
Emoticons are awesome-I love them-but not JUST the emoticon.
Upon occasion just an emoticon will suffice, sure.
A little substance would be nice though.
But your post history reveals you as a true featherweight.
Just saying.
Given the Political Board is a place you can ignore any article you want with any substance because it comes from a site you don't care about, any real veteran here would know that facebook and twitter messages would be the least credible of proof.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:48 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Do you have a link to something supporting that that isn't attributed to NYPD statements? Everything I've seen says the police were responding to call about a fight, a fight Garner allegedly helped break up, and a fight where the participants fled the scene as police started arriving.
Do you have a link to everything you have seen? This is the first I have heard of this "garner was a peace loving good samaritanr' meme,
And why do you discount records of calls to police from businesses on the street? They had called the police dozens of other times about this same man doing this same thing. Why do you discount THIS account?
Where are you getting your information? DU?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:48 pm to Tactical1
I mentioned that Twitter and FB were blowing up with attaboys for the killer.
He told me they weren't.
You then come here to tell me Twitter and FB don't count. Because you say they don't.
What do you want me to say?
Ok ?
He told me they weren't.
You then come here to tell me Twitter and FB don't count. Because you say they don't.
What do you want me to say?
Ok ?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:48 pm to Tactical1
quote:Least credible of proof of a public wave? What in your estimation would be more credible? A targeted poll?
veteran here would know that facebook and twitter messages would be the least credible of proof
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
apologists showing up to tell us all how Garner got what he deserved.
I don't know if he deserved it or not - but he did suffer the consequences of what he started.
He was in complete control of his destiny from the moment he woke up that morning right up to the point where he resisted arrest.
The cops were just doing their jobs in response to his actions. What happened to him is the fault of nobody but himself.
You have the luxury of sitting at your keyboard and refining every sentence you type in. You can sit and conjure up various scenarios of what may or may not happen and dream up a response to each one to suit whatever narrative you are trying to push.
in the real world, complex interactions happen in seconds with no second chance. Decisions are made in split seconds with no opportunity weigh different options. Police fall back on their training and basic human instinct when in a battle with another human for their life or safety.
What they did was completely consistent with reasonable response to the threat presented. If you cannot see that you are willfully blind.
You can sit in your armchair and posit 'what ifs' all day, but it does not make the cops into bad men. This whole episode is a result of a series of bad decisions by Eric Garner over many weeks. He and he alone is to blame for his demise.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:34 pm to ChineseBandit58
You typed all that out and don't understand anything about causation or free will (or you're just shitty at arguing). You pretend that Garner's choice were the only choices made. Pantaleo made a choice to take him down after 30 seconds of talk for an offense that was a citation. Pantaleo decided to compress his neck and chest. Garner didn't. You can pretend that all the causation was solely on Garner's end, but it's inaccurate. So I didn't bother reading past your first paragraph or two.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
Pantaleo made a choice to take him down after 30 seconds of talk for an offense that was a citation.
Are you sure of that? Are you positive that this squad was not sent out to arrest Garner for continuing this same violation for the umpteenth time? Are you sure that they were sent to give a citation? It is my understanding that they were supposed to arrest the man. You think Blasio would have been happy if they came back and said "yep - we gave ol Eric a citation - that ought to keep him straight.'
quote:
fter 30 seconds of talk
During which Garner physically resisted arrest.
quote:
Pantaleo decided to compress his neck
While subduing someone resisting arrest. You are seriously 2nd guessing the situation to suggest he could have been subdued any other way.
quote:
You can pretend that all the causation was solely on Garner's end, but it's inaccurate
No - my assessment is the more accurate of the two of us. In fact a grand jury agrees with me and disagrees with you.
quote:
I didn't bother reading past your first paragraph or two.
I try hard to make sure people know what I am trying to say - You are free to read it or not - just don't mischaracterize what I say if you don't read it.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:48 pm to ChineseBandit58
You just proved that you still don't understand causation by typing out a bunch more stuff. You're asserting that Pantaleo had only option in the given situation. That's absurd.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:06 pm to the808bass
I'm done with this.
You choose to think the cops are to blame in this. You are wrong. We will never agree.
But -- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!!
You choose to think the cops are to blame in this. You are wrong. We will never agree.
But -- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!!
Posted on 12/23/14 at 12:09 am to Lsupimp
quote:
You then come here to tell me Twitter and FB don't count. Because you say they don't.
I'll keep that in mind when you scoff at anything posted on Twitter or facebook.
Posted on 12/23/14 at 12:31 am to Lsupimp
What exactly does this have to do with liberalism?
Posted on 12/23/14 at 12:34 am to Zed
quote:
“With Dante, very early on, we said, ‘Look, if a police officer stops you, do everything he tells you to do. Don’t move suddenly. Don’t reach for your cellphone,’” said deBlasio. “Because we knew, sadly, there’s a greater chance it might be misinterpreted if it was a young man of color.”
Is this what OP is stroking out about?
Posted on 12/23/14 at 8:11 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Do you have a link to everything you have seen?
Maybe.
quote:
This is the first I have heard of this "garner was a peace loving good samaritanr' meme,
But judging from this statement, you don't have the reading comprehension skills to discern what they might say, so I won't waste my time.
quote:
And why do you discount records of calls to police from businesses on the street?
Again with the poor reading comprehension. Where did I say I didn't.
quote:
They had called the police dozens of other times about this same man doing this same thing.
Oh, you're talking about prior incidents. See, I'm talking solely about the confrontation where Garner lost his life.
Look, I know what the NYPD said happened, and it doesn't jibe with what's in the video, so I'm looking for something to corroborate the NYPD's version of events.
Posted on 12/23/14 at 9:23 am to EmperorGout
quote:
You voted for GW Bush twice didn't you
this is unbelievable to me. you're nearly 2 terms into a new presidency and people are still bringing this shite up.
hey, btw, did you know that GW tried to set up a committee to oversee fannie and freddie given potential issues in the mortgage markets? (i think this was in '03). Guess who shot it down?
Posted on 12/23/14 at 9:45 am to mostbesttigerfanever
His party controlled both the House and Senate from 2003-2007. How was he shot down?
Page 13 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News