- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:09 pm to FCP
quote:
Hunter manufactured 313,343 votes in eking out a narrow win over Eric from LSU (who put together 311,701 votes).
I doubt they are disqualifying for bots and a two click script would be easy. Why don't you all just use bots too?
lol
FWIW I put in a few hundred votes last night just because.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:10 pm to bbap
quote:
I legit hope they mean that
Agreed.
But if last round is any indication, with some of the averages that FCP and others were posting (which very clearly scream "bots/scripts"), they sure as hell haven't meant it up to this point.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:12 pm to bbap
I got it.. Lets use Bots to vote against Hunter in this round. No harm, right?
Get Lucas 1,000,000 votes from bots.
Get Lucas 1,000,000 votes from bots.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:14 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:Somebody needs to punch the HunterBot and wake it up. At last check he had a whopping 6 votes to only 4 for his opponent. Guess his supporters are all wiped out from that exhausting 313K they logged this past week.
if last round is any indication
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:15 pm to Napoleon
Bud Light has definitely trolled us. F5 used to be ok, they they trolled us with epic sax guy. Now it's ok again. Then they aren't clear if scripts or bots are ok or not and just say we'll ban for cheating without even defining it. It's nuts.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:18 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
Do you really need them to define it? They're clearly referencing computer scripts.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:20 pm to Napoleon
I just gave Lucas 50 and I'm not the only one f5ing him he shot up quick.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:20 pm to bbap
If that were true, some people wouldn't be in this competition. Or they aren't enforcing it and just wagging their fingers at us. So yes I wish they would define it. 
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:23 pm to Napoleon
quote:
just gave Lucas 50 and I'm not the only one f5ing him he shot up quick.
Lucas is probably going wth. And Hunter's bots are stuck on the previous contest still trying to vote.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:24 pm to bbap
quote:If they have any intention of enforcing the policy, they should definitely give a better description. Assuming someone had unlimited time, a fast internet connection, and the ability to sit at a computer uninterrupted, there's no telling how many hundreds of thousands of votes could be generated in a week. Obviously if the same IP continues to generate a set number of votes per minute, it's a pretty strong indication that the voting is mechanized, but as long as the vote totals (via bot or otherwise) don't exceed what's humanly possible, their "warning" is pretty damn meaningless.
Do you really need them to define it? They're clearly referencing computer scripts.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:29 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
I'll get to Lucas later. I would like to see him shoot out the gates with a huge lead. Take out Hunter now and you can coast the rest of the competition.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:33 pm to Napoleon
OP is updated. 
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:34 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
They are talking about going forward from this point on. They very well might not enforce it but it's really not hard to understand. At all.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:35 pm to Napoleon
quote:Just don't forget our boy, BJ. He shot out to a quick 500+ lead, but now he's sitting still while Maggie has gotten to over 100 in the early voting. 529 to 101. Meanwhile, Lucas is over 200 in the early voting while Hunter is stuck on 10
Take out Hunter now and you can coast the rest of the competition.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:35 pm to FCP
All they have to do is see the per vote rate at 4am. It will be pretty clear.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:37 pm to FCP
Hunter's out buying new chipsets for his computers. They burned up in the last week.
This would be good for not a single person in this competition.
quote:
All they have to do is see the per vote rate at 4am. It will be pretty clear.
This would be good for not a single person in this competition.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:41 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
Disagree. We woke up with no more than 200 more votes each day from the night before.
It would be excellent for us because we have a ton of shift work voters. They just weren't needed against MSU.
It would be excellent for us because we have a ton of shift work voters. They just weren't needed against MSU.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:49 pm to bbap
I've voted like 10 times. I guess this is the one I stopped by a few years ago?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:04 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
quote:
This would be good for not a single person in this competition.
I understand you are trying to be the voice of reason, but instead you are denying clear examples of Hunter cheating. You downplay the evidence and state everyone is doing it which may or may not be true. But dont act like Hunter hasnt cheated the entire time.
Page 120 of 129
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News