Started By
Message

2010 Kurtz inteview: How Lucas ruined Star Wars

Posted on 11/30/14 at 9:59 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51405 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 9:59 pm
LINK /

quote:

“We had no idea what we were starting,” said Kurtz, who was the producer of the first two “Star Wars” films and also a second-unit director. “That simple concept changed Hollywood in a way….”

There was a bittersweet tinge to Kurtz’s voice, and it’s no surprise. This year is the 30th anniversary of “The Empire Strikes Back,” the “Star Wars” sequel that many fans consider the pinnacle moment in a franchise that has pulled in $16 billion in box office and merchandising. But 1980 was also the year that Kurtz and Lucas realized the Jedi universe wasn’t big enough for the both of them.

“I could see where things were headed,” Kurtz said. “The toy business began to drive the [Lucasfilm] empire. It’s a shame. They make three times as much on toys as they do on films. It’s natural to make decisions that protect the toy business, but that’s not the best thing for making quality films.”
Empireposter

He added: “The first film and ‘Empire’ were about story and character, but I could see that George’s priorities were changing.”....

“I don’t like the idea of prequels, they make the filmmakers back in to material they’ve already covered and it boxes in the story,” Kurtz said. “I think they did a pretty good job with them although I have to admit I never liked Hayden Christensen in the role of Anakin Skywalker. I just wished the stories had been stronger and that the dialogue had been stronger. It gets meek. I’m not sure the characters ever felt real like they did in ‘Empire.’”

After the release of “Empire” (which was shaped by material left over from that first Lucas treatment), talk turned to a third film and after a decade and a half the partners could no longer find a middle ground.

“We had an outline and George changed everything in it,” Kurtz said. “Instead of bittersweet and poignant he wanted a euphoric ending with everybody happy. The original idea was that they would recover [the kidnapped] Han Solo in the early part of the story and that he would then die in the middle part of the film in a raid on an Imperial base. George then decided he didn’t want any of the principals killed. By that time there were really big toy sales and that was a reason.”

The discussed ending of the film that Kurtz favored presented the rebel forces in tatters, Leia grappling with her new duties as queen and Luke walking off alone “like Clint Eastwood in the spaghetti westerns,” as Kurtz put it.
Crystal

Kurtz said that ending would have been a more emotionally nuanced finale to an epic adventure than the forest celebration of the Ewoks that essentially ended the trilogy with a teddy bear luau.

He was especially disdainful of the Lucas idea of a second Death Star, which he felt would be too derivative of the 1977 film. “So we agreed that I should probably leave.”
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12126 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

The discussed ending of the film that Kurtz favored presented the rebel forces in tatters, Leia grappling with her new duties as queen and Luke walking off alone “like Clint Eastwood in the spaghetti westerns,” as Kurtz put it.
Crystal


interesting. As someone who has Jedi at the top of my list, not sure how that would have played for me. I saw it as a kid and that is why I loved it but this alternate where it was in tatters would have probably put a bad taste in my mouth for the series.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35270 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:07 pm to
Star Wars can't decide what it is. Is it dark? Is it a kid movie? No stability.
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12126 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

Star Wars can't decide what it is. Is it dark? Is it a kid movie? No stability.



like he said, toys and tie-ins are where the money is. You have to keep it family friendly to sell the toys and fast food sponsorships.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35270 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

toys and tie-ins are where the money is.
Hopefully JJ Abrams does not think this way. That is such bullshite. So much opportunity ruined.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14420 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:12 pm to
I've read this before and it makes a lot of sense when I think back. ROTJ had the best toys. I'd still cut my mothers throat for the Han Solo in Carbonite figure. Couldn't find that fricker anywhere.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39195 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Hopefully JJ Abrams does not think this way.

if he doesn't, Disney certainly does

Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35270 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:29 pm to
I'm not gonna judge it based off of that teaser. Why they decided to put that little soccer ball thing in it, I have no idea. That lightsaber was also horrible. I'm reserving full judgement for the time being.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39195 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Why they decided to put that little soccer ball thing in it, I have no idea.

because its cute like Wall-E and kids will want to own the toy, not to mention the fanboys who will buy anything Star Wars related
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:34 pm to
Fanboys have ruined Star Wars far more than Lucas ever could.
This post was edited on 11/30/14 at 10:35 pm
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18564 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:43 pm to
What?
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 10:45 pm to
They quite literally have not.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36692 posts
Posted on 11/30/14 at 11:18 pm to
Here's to hoping JJ can avoid Lucas' terrible ideas
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 7:53 am to
quote:

“The toy business began to drive the [Lucasfilm] empire. It’s a shame. They make three times as much on toys as they do on films. It’s natural to make decisions that protect the toy business, but that’s not the best thing for making quality films.”

this is kind of like the prequels just being a way for lucas to give 7+ hours of free advertising for ILM
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34474 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 7:56 am to
quote:

“We had an outline and George changed everything in it,” Kurtz said. “Instead of bittersweet and poignant he wanted a euphoric ending with everybody happy. The original idea was that they would recover [the kidnapped] Han Solo in the early part of the story and that he would then die in the middle part of the film in a raid on an Imperial base. George then decided he didn’t want any of the principals killed. By that time there were really big toy sales and that was a reason.”

The discussed ending of the film that Kurtz favored presented the rebel forces in tatters, Leia grappling with her new duties as queen and Luke walking off alone “like Clint Eastwood in the spaghetti westerns,” as Kurtz put it.


ROTJ could have been a lot better, this was not the way to make that happen.

Lucas clearly had in mind to wrap up the trilogy. It needed a definite "ending".

quote:

I don’t like the idea of prequels, they make the filmmakers back in to material they’ve already covered and it boxes in the story,” Kurtz said. “I think they did a pretty good job with them


Wow. Maybe this guy isn't the genius we thought he was. Prequels are hot shite on a plate.
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 7:59 am
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21843 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Wow. Maybe this guy isn't the genius we thought he was. Prequels are hot shite on a plate.



Sounds like he was just being polite.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150737 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I'd still cut my mothers throat for the Han Solo in Carbonite figure. Couldn't find that fricker anywhere.

Here you go.

And here you go:

Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Kurtz said that ending would have been a more emotionally nuanced finale to an epic adventure than the forest celebration of the Ewoks that essentially ended the trilogy with a teddy bear luau.


Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76309 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 8:47 am to
I never liked te Ewoks and I also thought Fett didn't do enough
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

It gets meek. I’m not sure the characters ever felt real like they did in ‘Empire.’”

That's an understatement.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram