Started By
Message

Will the Saints cut Morstead this offseason?

Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:18 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:18 pm
He's been a great punter for us for a while now. I started this thread in the offseason and was ripped apart for it.

His contract:

2015 - $3.4 million cap hit. Save $1.25 by cutting him
2016 - $4.45 million cap hit. Save $3.25 by cutting him
2017 - $4 million cap hit.

Is it worth paying the price of a solid contributor on offense or defense for a position that can be filled for the minimum?

For comparison:

Sproles
2014 - $2 million
2015 - $4 million
2016 - $4 million

Keenan Lewis
2014 - $3.35 million
2015 - $4.85 million
2016 - $7.3 million

Easily enough for a FA guard

Posted by Gugich22
Who Dat Nation
Member since Jan 2006
27710 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:21 pm to
I don't think so. They might ask him to restructure but he's a great punter.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166135 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:22 pm to
He sucks too
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115468 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:22 pm to
He'll restructure.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43296 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:22 pm to
I hope not. He's a weapon.
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
16970 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

He'll restructure


He'll HAVE to.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:26 pm to
Needs to. That's too much.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

He sucks too



Not really about that. He's great at NET punting

I just don't think a punter's value is equal to a key contributor on offense or defense.

The difference between our NET average at #3 and the the 15 team is 3 yards/punt

Then you have to factor in our offense. We have the least amount of punts in the NFL and are always near the lowest in the league

Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30087 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:27 pm to
Issue is you save 1.25mil by cutting him, down a punter, and you need to then spend 420k on another punter that is rather unknown. You'd save only 800k, but sacrificing a solid punter for an unknown. There are better ways to make 800k. Next year is the better time to do it, not this.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 3:28 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I hope not. He's a weapon.



We punt the least amount in the NFL and we're talking about 3-4 net yards difference, assuming the rookie we bring doesn't have a cannon.

We're talking about 9-12 yards a game difference or having that money to spend on oline or a pass threat
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

nd you need to then spend 420k on another punter that is rather unknown. You'd save only 800k, but sacrificing a solid punter for an unknown.


Are you sure about this?

Only the top 51 players count against the cap and we'll have several at $420k that don't count.

So we'd save $1.25 million by cutting him this year

quote:

Next year is the better time to do it, not this.


Its an obvious choice that year.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166135 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:31 pm to
Most overrated punter ever
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30087 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:46 pm to
True, but that is considering we don't have a 400-500k salary player on this team come next year.

Even at 1.25mil in savings, you lose 2.15mil in dead money. It just isn't as worthwhile when we lose more in dead money than savings.

For underperforming players, anything 1:1 or better is perfect (Hawthorne's case 3mil savings, 3mil dead), anything worse than 1:1 is not ideal (Grubbs' case 6.0mil dead, 3.6mil savings).

Cutting Grubbs next year saves us 7.3mil, but we lose 3.0mil, that is an ideal time. Perfect scenario too because solid guards like: Marshal Yanda (32 y/o in 2016), Alex Boone (29 y/o in 2016), and David DeCastro (26 y/o in 2016) hit the market. Don't have to spend 2 draft pick on guards when you can get a young vet like decastro.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Even at 1.25mil in savings, you lose 2.15mil in dead money. It just isn't as worthwhile when we lose more in dead money than savings.



That is the wrong way to look at it IMO. It is a sunk cost. So you'd have to ask yourself is that risk worth $1.25 million towards another player. I'd absolutely agree with you if he was going to go against the 51, which I highly doubt he would

quote:

Don't have to spend 2 draft pick on guards when you can get a young vet like decastro.


True, which is why it is time to go away from our old philosophy. I still want an incredibly athletic rookie guard like Dallas has.

I think it would be
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10047 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:01 pm to
Restructure. Push it back for a few years. Revisit in 2018.
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6325 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Easily enough for a FA guard

If the position of need is for Guard, they'll almost certainly go after the players in those positions now for restructuring. By asking Morstead to restructure for a need on the offensive line is the age-old analogy, "Robbing Peter to pay Paul". Now, if they were going after a kicker with a longer FG range, then I would say asking Morstead to restructure wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility. Typically GMs look at salaries categorically, ie. you move money from Special Teams to pay for a need on Special teams.

The real issue is we are paying big money for sub-par play at the Guard position. Honestly they need to target a Guard in the draft and possibly grab a FA from somewhere. Also they need to get a real Oline coach. This transition for Ingalls is clearly not working out. As far as the fate of Evans and Grubbs, one of them should go and the better of the two should be kept at a reduced rate. They've looked like oversized babies on roller skates getting pushed around all season.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

As far as the fate of Evans and Grubbs, one of them should go and the better of the two should be kept at a reduced rate.


I honestly don't think we should keep either one of them at this point. We have a chance to have a very young, athletic, and cheap offensive line next year.

quote:

"Robbing Peter to pay Paul". Now, if they were going after a kicker with a longer FG range, then I would say asking Morstead to restructure wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility. Typically GMs look at salaries categorically, ie. you move money from Special Teams to pay for a need on Special teams.


Well they impact each other. The Saints offense is very good and does not punt the ball much. I'd much rather save $1-4 million a year for an offensive/defensive weapon that 10 yards/game punting.

Coaches don't like the unknown though and there is always a risk when you change it up
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 4:10 pm
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6325 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:10 pm to
I'd be shocked if they draft 2 guards though. Especially with the needs on defense. We obviously need a second lock-down corner to complement Lewis on the other side. Linebacker has been woefully ignored for far too long in the draft by this FO. The last two games against run-heavy offenses have pretty much shown the entire league that all they have to do is borrow Les Miles' playbook in preparation for playing the Saints. We are looking like we will also need another NT with Bunkley showing his age. That doesn't even address the hole that Mark Ingram will leave on our running game after he leaves. Also Colston is probably done, so now we need a quality possession receiver.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 4:12 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I'd be shocked if they draft 2 guards though. Especially with the needs on defense


So would I, but honestly I think that we should be looking to FA for defense unless we find an ILB we love. Luckily, guard is a position with plenty of options via the draft and FA without a huge curve

quote:

That doesn't even address the hole that Mark Ingram will leave on our running game.


Which was more of the point to this thread. We're paying our punter starting RB money.

We're going to role with Khiry and PT next year and might draft someone late. Would love the luxury of rolling with a quick back

Anyways, I understand the reasons for keeping him, but that contract...woof
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 4:18 pm
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6325 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't think we should keep either one of them at this point. We have a chance to have a very young, athletic, and cheap offensive line next year.

Do not discount the effect that a veteran can have on the interior line. You don't want a bunch of young-bloods in the middle of the line for Brees. A good defensive line who knows how to do a lot of stunts and twists will really reek havoc on a rookie interior. Look at Dallas last year, when their amazing Oline (this year) was cutting their teeth. It resulted in a potentially career-ending injury for Romo.

To me, Grubbs would be the best candidate based on what I've seen this year. Evans looks lethargic and running high in mileage this year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram