Started By
Message

re: Stolen from OT: No chemical weapons in Iraq, except for the ones ISIS just used

Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:30 am to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64322 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

There Bush and Cheney tried to spin the findings


Good lord VB is this really a "gotcha" moment? Politicians wrong then try to spin it to their advantage.
Never seen that before.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

I know you have read all the quotes from Clinton, Gore, Kerry and many other Dems when they were in power and getting intel briefings then coming to the mics and saying the exact things Bush said.



Yes that was right before operation Desert Fox when Clinton bomb the hell out of those WMD sites he claimed they had:
quote:

By December 19, U.S. and British aircraft had struck 97 targets, and Secretary of Defense William Cohen claimed the operation was a success. Supported by Secretary Cohen, as well as United States Central Command commander General Anthony C. Zinni and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Henry H. Shelton, President Bill Clinton declared "victory" in Operation DESERT FOX. In total, the 70-hour campaign saw U.S. forces strike 85 percent of their targets, 75 percent of which were considered "highly effective" strikes. More than 600 sorties were flown by more than 300 combat and support aircraft, and 600 air dropped munitions were employed, including 90 air launched cruise missiles and 325 Tomahawk land attack missiles (TLAM). Operation DESERT FOX inflicted serious damage to Iraq's missile development program, although its effects on any WMD program were not clear. Nevertheless, Operation DESERT FOX was the largest strike against Iraq since the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War, until the commencement of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM.


And back the Republicans called it all bullshite and Clinton's attempt to divert attention from Monica. Four years later, they took the same information, ignored the results of the bombing campaign and used it as justification to invade.
[
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64322 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:33 am to
Saddam kick out the inspectors. Months go by. More UN resolutions as asked by everyone on the planet. More ultimatums more votes and resolutions. Months and months go by and for reasons I still don't understand Saddam flipped the bird to the UN and the US.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:33 am to
And yet they haven't told the truth, according to Choctaw, that Iraq in fact had WMD. They instead agreed with Dufler that they had the capability to start a new program.

The mental gymnastics you guys go through every day to justify the past
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35389 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:35 am to
quote:

What was he lacking?
Just about everything. But most importantly nuclear material suitable for a nuclear weapon. He didn't even have enough raw nuclear material.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134856 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Iraq officials said two other crude chlorine gas attacks have occurred, though few details exist, the Post reported.


How crude are we talking here? Mixing bleach and ammonia isn't exactly complicated. You don't need to raid a chemical weapons depot for that.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64322 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:41 am to
I don't recall using any
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

So why not invade Iran, North Korea, Syria just to make sure for them as well?


Um...Syria is at the plate now.

Iran is apparently on deck.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39575 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

And back the Republicans called it all bullshite and Clinton's attempt to divert attention from Monica


Clinton was already being impeached at the time of Desert Fox. The claimed "diversion" was the Sudan strike in August of 1998 that supposedly hit a pharmaceutical plant.

I suppose some may have said Fox was a diversion as well considering it was happening right before to the date of his impeachment, but the more famously declared diversion was the Sudan strike.

At least, that's how I remember it
This post was edited on 10/24/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 9:59 am to
quote:

The reason Bush and Cheney aren't talking is because they are soooo humble.


yeah...Bush has been all over the television since his Presidency ended
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

And all this was going on when we had 200,000 troops on their border, our navy off their coast and our Air Force flying over their country enforcing the no fly zones (not to mention on satellites) and we didn't see any of this?





Apparently a lot of things can be hidden over there. Obama totally missed the growth of ISIS didn't he?
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19065 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Bush's case was based on Iraq's ongoing manufacturing of WMDs.

Not so. the contention existing WMD's and precursor materials to reconstitute the program.
and just as a side note, bush was correct to invade Iraq.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35632 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Saddam kick out the inspectors. Months go by. More UN resolutions as asked by everyone on the planet. More ultimatums more votes and resolutions. Months and months go by and for reasons I still don't understand Saddam flipped the bird to the UN and the US.
Funny how we didn't care what he did or didn't do, have or didn't have, until he threatened the Petro dollar and refused to cooperate with the international banking cabal.
Then, overnight, he was portrayed as a murderous dictating WMD horder.

But, I'm sure that was all just coincidence.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

But most importantly nuclear material suitable for a nuclear weapon. He didn't even have enough raw nuclear material.


He had yellowcake, not raw ore. The bomb design the UN inspectors found in Iraq called for ~30 lbs of U235. Five hundred tons of yellowcake is plenty even with sloppy refining.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89509 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Iraq in fact had WMD
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

The militants have a former Iraqi chemical weapons factory within their captured territory, though officials said that the 2,500 weapons there are likely unfit for use and were sealed in a bunker more than 20 years ago.


Isn't it great the inspectors abandoned their monitoring of this facility when Bush invaded Iraq?

Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64322 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 10:27 am to
Some of what you say is correct as well.

The 1st war was a fight over oil and liberation of that almost England like country to the US of Kuwait. It was stated as such.

The second war after 9-11 was stated as assuring the US citizens that saddam would have no WMD to sell or give to terrorist for use against us in another 9-11.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35632 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Some of what you say is correct as well.

The 1st war was a fight over oil and liberation of that almost England like country to the US of Kuwait. It was stated as such.

The second war after 9-11 was stated as assuring the US citizens that saddam would have no WMD to sell or give to terrorist for use against us in another 9-11.
The 1st war was fought for the reasons I outlined in my previous post, but we ran like frightened rabbits when Saddam began burning the oil wells.

9/11 provided the excuse to go back in and finish the job.

But go ahead and keep believing that our government would spend a fortune and put our military in harms way to "liberate" people on the other side of the globe, when it couldn't give two fricks about its own people right here in the U.S.A.
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 1:50 pm to
Bush's case was based on CIA info you azz0 liberal, the same CIA info that Clinton received in 1999. Everyone knows the Iraqis had chemical weapons except you liberal idiots who attacked our president during war time for politial gain in order to get your perverted agenda through in D.C., that's all that matters to you backwards POS's.

An Iraqi general has admitted as much and told how they were moved to Syria.

Of course since Saddam broke his cease fire agreement Bush had every right to take action against a tyrant who murdered 1.6 innocent civilians.

traitorous azz0's be damned.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11480 posts
Posted on 10/24/14 at 2:37 pm to
"The Iraq Study Group"

"The United States Institute of Peace"



We are living in an Ayn Rand novel with these titles.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram